Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Bhanu Pratap v. Vimal Aggarwal
The Delhi High Court allowed the judgment debtor's petition to keep the auction of attached property in abeyance until payment of the decretal amount is made by a specified date, subject to initial deposit and phased payment.
Dalip Kumar v. Registrar, Debts Recovery Tribunal-III, New Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that statutory Recruitment Rules govern promotion eligibility and cannot be overridden by executive instructions, entitling the petitioner to promotion consideration upon completing eight years’ service as Court Master.
Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board v. Trilok Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against an ex parte injunction directing the Trial Court to expeditiously decide the pending application to set aside the injunction before appellate intervention.
Harman Preet Singh v. Inderjeet Kaur & Anr.
The High Court dismissed the petition seeking impleadment of the petitioner as a defendant in a possession suit, holding that he was neither a necessary nor proper party and must pursue separate legal remedies.
Neena Khanna v. Wenger & Co & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that permission to lead secondary evidence cannot be denied without allowing the party to lead foundational evidence during trial, directing the trial court to reconsider the application accordingly.
Mohd Rafat Khan v. Ms Najma Raza
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's grant of unconditional leave to defend in a summary suit based on a disputed cheque involving matrimonial discord and triable issues.
F.C.S. SOLUTIONS LTD. v. A.P. ASSOCIATES
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to exhibit a complete document previously exhibited partially due to clerical error, imposing costs for the delay caused.
Arvind Aggarwal v. Babu Lal Gupta
The Delhi High Court clarified that permission to place documents on record under CPC provisions does not amount to proof, and directed the plaintiff to produce documents with admitted signatures for expert examination.
Neosky India Limited & Anr. v. Nagendran Kandasamy & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a valid arbitration agreement exists, appointed an arbitrator, and left substantive disputes including non-compete enforceability and impleadment of non-signatories for the arbitral tribunal to decide.
Vivek Garg v. Akhilesh Pati Tripathi
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of an MLA accused of cheating the government by wrongly claiming medical reimbursements, ruling that no prior sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C. was required and that the prosecution failed to prove dishonest intention.
Harjeet Singh Talwar v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 25 Arms Act, 1959, holding that mere inadvertent possession of live cartridges without conscious knowledge or intent does not constitute an offence.
Vahid @ Waseem v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the third bail application of the accused in a murder case, holding that bail is not warranted in heinous offences with active participation and witness threats despite co-accused juveniles being granted bail.
Amrendra Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a cheating and conspiracy case, holding that absence of grounds of arrest and completion of investigation justified bail with conditions.
Nitin Jain v. Pallavi Jain
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's dissolution of marriage under Section 13(1A)(ii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, ruling that territorial jurisdiction objections were waived and that the respondent's statutory right to divorce was not barred by alleged concealment or 'own wrong'.
Drharors Aesthetics Private Ltd v. Debdulal Banerjee; Drharors Aesthetics Private Ltd v. Rahul Shawel
The Delhi High Court set aside an interim injunction restraining a company from convening meetings to remove a director, holding that judicial interference in internal corporate governance is impermissible absent mala fide conduct and statutory non-compliance.
Ajay Jain v. State (GNCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 287 and 337 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, relying on the principle that continuation of criminal proceedings would be unjust and an abuse of process.
Kuldeep Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings under Sections 323/341/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, emphasizing the court's power to prevent abuse of process through compromise.
Preetam Thakur & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings under Section 528 BNS based on an amicable settlement between the parties, applying the principle that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process of law.
SP Dabas v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under the SC/ST Act following an amicable settlement between parties, applying the principle that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Ashish Gupta & Ors. v. The State N.C.T. of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process of law.