Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Dr. Sri Krishan v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for Letters of Administration with Will annexed, holding the Will dated 12.06.2000 validly executed and not barred by limitation.
Delhi Transport Corporation v. Ashok Kumar
The Delhi High Court allowed a review petition solely to correct an erroneous date in its earlier judgment on reinstatement and compensation, dismissing all other reliefs sought.
Nem Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition seeking to reargue entitlement to relief without actual discharge of duties in the specified pay scale, reaffirming that review petitions cannot revisit settled issues.
Sudheer Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the petitioner’s transfer on administrative grounds, holding that transfer policies apply as per their scope and administrative requirements prevail.
Union of India and Ors. v. Jay Shanker Prasad Retd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's writ petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for seizure disorder, affirming the presumption that disabilities developing during service are attributable to military service unless proven otherwise.
Director (Education Department) v. Shailender Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging its order directing compliance with a Tribunal order, holding that non-compliance justified contempt proceedings and no grounds existed for review or stay.
Sarwan Kumar & Ors. v. Union Public Service Commission & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that candidates possessing valid OBC-NCL certificates issued outside a fixed window period cannot be excluded from reservation benefits, dismissing UPSC's plea to modify its earlier order permitting such candidates to participate in the CAPF selection.
Manish Kumar Munda v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406 and 420 IPC as an abuse of process, holding that a contractual dispute over investment and profit sharing does not constitute criminal breach of trust or cheating without dishonest intention at inception.
Bright Westech Solution Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. v. Naushad Malik
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking appointment of a Local Commissioner for inspection of allegedly defective batteries, holding that the Court cannot be used as a tool for evidence collection at the stage of final arguments.
Rupalee Suri v. Kamal Suri & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a wife claiming residence rights under the Domestic Violence Act is not a necessary party to her husband's partition suit and upheld the dismissal of her impleadment application.
Rajiv Gujral v. Surender Arora
The court upheld the trial court’s dismissal of the defendant’s application to amend the written statement to retract an earlier admission regarding tenancy, holding such retraction impermissible in law.
Qayyum Khan v. Delhi Development Authority & Anr.
The High Court held that marking documents as exhibits during cross-examination does not prove them and refused to de-exhibit them, allowing the petitioner to challenge their proof later.
Minakshi Singh; Annu Singh; Ashutosh Bharti v. Niranjan Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order reinstating a Postal Assistant whose termination for alleged concealment of an FIR was found unjustified as he was unaware of the FIR at the time of declaration and was acquitted in the criminal trial.
Dev Verma v. State and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash the FIR against Dev Verma, holding that prima facie material connecting him to stolen jewellery requires trial and cannot be summarily dismissed.
Bharath Natarajan v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Tribunal's refusal to condone delay in filing a recruitment-related application, holding that delay without sufficient cause disentitles relief.
Santosh Kumar Sahu v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed review petitions and upheld that PBORs are entitled to condonation of shortfall in qualifying service and pro-rata pension, rejecting retrospective application of a later circular denying such benefits.
Court on its Own Motion v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court monitored and directed the GNCTD to expedite healthcare infrastructure completion and medical staff recruitment, ensuring effective implementation of health schemes under judicial supervision.
India Steel v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the reasoned GST demand order, directed the petitioner to file appeal with pre-deposit, and deferred the challenge to notifications extending adjudication deadlines pending Supreme Court's decision.
Ganpati Polymers v. Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging GST orders on fraudulent ITC availment due to non-participation and upheld the validity of the order passed within limitation, while allowing time to file statutory appeal.
Diwakar Pandey & Ors. v. Ministry of Home Affairs & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to complete the CISF cadre review within four months, ensuring promotional avenues per UPSC and DoP&T guidelines, and dismissed the review petition challenging these directions.