Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Sukhjit Singh & Ors. v. The State of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 506, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement and full and final compromise between the parties in a matrimonial dispute.
Subhash & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act on the ground of settlement between parties and discontinuance of prosecution by the complainant.
Shubham Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail to an accused ATM operator alleged to have stolen Rs. 7.41 lakh, relying on physical and documentary evidence and rejecting unsubstantiated claims of prior resignation.
Sanjay Kumar & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR No. 260/2022 involving offences under Sections 323, 354(B), 379, 509, and 34 IPC on the ground of compromise between parties, subject to payment of costs.
Mr. Amit Choudhary; Ms. Akansha Mehra v. SHARP CORP LTD
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash a complaint under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that defects in the Board Resolution authorizing prosecution do not warrant quashing and are matters for trial court determination.
Kaptan Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 363 IPC on the ground of compromise and settled family life, allowing the petition in the interest of justice.
Amit Arora v. Tarun Sethi
The Delhi High Court disposed of the landlord-tenant appeal by recording an amicable settlement directing the tenant to vacate the property and clear rent arrears by a specified date, with a moratorium on execution proceedings.
Sunil Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a Section 308/34 IPC case subject to bond and surety, warning him against non-appearance and witness tampering.
Pawan v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for rape and related offences under IPC and POCSO Act, holding that the reliable testimony of the child victim corroborated by forensic evidence sufficed to invoke the presumption of guilt under Section 29 of the POCSO Act, which the appellant failed to rebut.
IDBI Bank Ltd v. P D Gupta and Company
The Delhi High Court upheld the refund of Rs. 1 crore with interest to a buyer who paid under an unsanctioned One-Time Settlement proposal, holding that the bank could not appropriate the amount without the buyer's consent.
Shantanu Prakash v. Doris Chug Gim Lian
The Delhi High Court held that delay in filing Written Statements beyond 120 days under its Rules cannot be condoned, affirming the mandatory nature of procedural timelines and rejecting discretionary extensions.
Reckitt Benckiser (India) Private Limited v. Sauss Home Products Private Limited
Delhi High Court granted interim injunction to plaintiff in trademark passing off suit, rejecting defendant's jurisdictional and prior use claims based on fabricated evidence.
Amit Kumar and Others v. State of NCT of Delhi and Another
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement and compromise between the parties, holding that prosecution was not in the interest of justice.
Union of India v. M/S Prestressed Udyog
The Delhi High Court upheld the exclusive jurisdiction clause favoring Delhi courts and dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award rejecting the Ministry of Railways' counterclaims for liquidated damages against M/s Prestressed Udyog.
Munni Kanwar v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that the widow of a BSF officer who died of heart disease during official duties is entitled to Extraordinary Family Pension and ex gratia compensation despite the disease not being explicitly listed in the CCS (EOP) Rules.
Birmala Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. Ashwani Ahluwalia
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff’s application for judgment on admissions under Order XII Rule 6 CPC due to absence of clear and unequivocal admission by the defendant, emphasizing the need for trial in presence of fraud allegations.
M/S Merit Exports Pvt Ltd v. Mr Raj Kumar Gulati & Anr
The High Court granted the petitioner one final opportunity for cross-examination of its witness after the Trial Court prematurely closed evidence due to the witness’s non-availability, imposing costs for delay.
Sanjit Singh Salwan & Ors. v. Sardar Inderjit Singh Salwan & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that parties who accept an arbitral award and consent decree are estopped from later challenging its validity on non-arbitrability grounds, allowing execution proceedings to be revived.
Ajmera Shyam v. Kova Laxmi
The Supreme Court upheld the election of a candidate despite non-disclosure of income in the affidavit, holding that such omission was not substantial or corrupt practice warranting voiding the election under the Representation of People Act, 1951.
Pernod Ricard India Private Limited & Another v. Karanveer Singh Chhabra
The Supreme Court allowed the appellants' appeal and granted interim injunction against the respondent's use of the deceptively similar trademark 'LONDON PRIDE', reaffirming the test of overall similarity and protection of well-known marks under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.