Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Vishal Tiwari v. Union of India & Ors.
The Supreme Court directed SEBI to investigate allegations against the Adani Group and constituted an expert committee to assess and strengthen the securities market regulatory framework to protect investors.
Commissioner of Trade Tax v. Kumar Paints and Vimal Store
The Supreme Court held that mixing base paint with colorants does not amount to manufacture under the Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, dismissing the state's appeal and affirming the High Court's ruling.
6368ea4af64abfa150639880e1f9f5c3bca88efd415078c6e2fec82e2a6b7798
The court held that mixing colorants with base paint to produce different shades does not amount to 'production' of a new product under the Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948, and is therefore not taxable as production.
Commissioner of Trade Tax v. M/S. Kumar Paints and Mill Stores
The Supreme Court held that mixing base paint with colourants does not amount to 'manufacture' under the U.P. Trade Tax Act, as it does not produce a new commercial product, and dismissed the Revenue's appeals.
व्यापार कर आयुक्त v. कुमार पेंट्स और विमल स्टोर
The Supreme Court held that the tinting of base paint does not amount to manufacture under the Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, as it does not produce a new commercial product, and dismissed the Revenue's appeals.
Commissioner of Trade Tax v. Kumar Paints and Mill Stores
The Supreme Court held that mixing colorants into base paint does not constitute manufacture of a new product under the Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, dismissing the revenue's appeal for additional tax.
COMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX v. M/S. KUMAR PAINTS AND MILL STORES
The Supreme Court held that mixing base paint with colourants does not amount to manufacture under the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948, as it does not produce a new commercial commodity, dismissing the Revenue's appeals.
Anoop Baranwal v. Union of India
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the executive-led appointment process of Election Commissioners under Article 324(2), dismissing petitions seeking judicially mandated reforms and emphasizing separation of powers.
Super Diamond Tools v. K. Mohan Rao
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the setting aside of an arbitral award on grounds of public policy and limitation under the Arbitration and Limitation Acts in a partnership account dispute involving allegations of fraud.
SUPER DIAMOND TOOLS & ORS. v. K. MOHAN RAO
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the setting aside of an arbitral award as barred by limitation and contrary to public policy due to delayed fraud-based counter claims.
Super Diamond Tools v. K. Mohan Rao
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the setting aside of an arbitration award directing retrospective interest over 21 years, holding it contrary to public policy and barred by limitation despite findings of fraud.
SUPER DIAMOND TOOLS & ORS. v. K. MOHAN RAO
The Supreme Court upheld the setting aside of an arbitral award as barred by limitation and contrary to public policy where the claimant had knowledge of alleged fraud beyond the limitation period.
Nasheta Zaidi v. Central Board of Secondary Education
The Delhi High Court held that a student is entitled to full marks where the examiner’s tick marks indicate correctness, despite failure to award marks in the margin, and directed CBSE to correct the mark sheet accordingly.
Amazon Technologies Inc v. Lifestyle Equities CV & Anr
The Delhi High Court stayed a ₹336 crore trademark infringement decree against Amazon Technologies Inc, holding that unpleaded enhanced damages awarded ex parte violated natural justice and lacked evidentiary basis.
Jahangir Alom v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging discharge from BSF on medical grounds, upholding the medical board’s finding of mental unfitness and the consequent termination of service.
Shree Balaji Motors v. Hero Motocorp Ltd
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a Dealership Agreement between Shree Balaji Motors and Hero Motocorp Ltd.
Jain Shikanji Private Limited v. Satish Kumar Jain
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an interim injunction restraining the appellant from using the trade mark "Jain Shikanji," affirming that combined generic words can form a protectable mark and emphasizing the limited scope of appellate interference in interlocutory matters.
Babu Lal Jain v. Vijay Kumar Jain
The Delhi High Court directed the Rent Controller to expeditiously dispose of a pending leave to defend application in a rent control matter, citing undue delay and prejudice to the petitioner.
Commissioner of Customs v. M/S TANEJA AEROSPACE AND AVIATION LTD
The Delhi High Court held that Customs Authorities can independently verify compliance with exemption conditions but upheld that the aircraft was used for permissible non-scheduled passenger services under the DGCA permit, partly allowing the appeal.
Rajeev Kumar v. Zile Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's order permitting necessary amendments to the plaint upon addition of a new defendant under Order 1 Rule 10(4) CPC, while granting the petitioner a fresh opportunity to file an amended written statement.