Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Malani Construction Company v. Delhi International Arbitration Centre and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that MSMED Act benefits apply only prospectively from registration date and set aside MSEFC's arbitration reference for claims predating registration, allowing writ petitions challenging jurisdiction.
Md. Sardesh Ali v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition of a retired BSF personnel for financial upgradation and pension revision under the ACP scheme as a welfare measure despite missing service records, condoning procedural delay and directing payment of arrears.
Indian Oil Corporation Limited v. FEPL Engineering (P) Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award by the MSME Facilitation Council for procedural irregularities and failure to consider defenses, directing fresh arbitration before an independent arbitrator.
Bhagat Singh & Ors v. Tarbia Education Foundation & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's dismissal of defendants' application for transposition as plaintiffs due to their lack of interest in the suit property, dismissing the petition under Article 227 of the Constitution.
Meenu Prakash Bhantu v. State of Uttar Pradesh
The Supreme Court held that summoning an additional accused under Section 319 CrPC requires strong evidence of complicity, and mere suspicion or weak material is insufficient, setting aside the High Court's order summoning the appellant in a bank fraud case.
Meenu Prakash Bhantu v. Uttar Pradesh State & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that summoning additional accused under Section 319 CrPC requires sufficient prima facie evidence and set aside the High Court's dismissal of the revision petition, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.
Meenu Prakash Bhantu v. State of Uttar Pradesh
The Supreme Court held that summoning an additional accused under Section 319 CrPC requires strong evidence indicating near probability of complicity, and dismissed the application to summon the appellant who merely supplied an illegible account statement.
Messrs Creative Garments Limited v. Kashiram Verma
The Supreme Court set aside a Labour Court award of reinstatement and back wages due to the employee's failure to furnish a permanent address and show interest in resuming duty, emphasizing the necessity of effective notice service in labour disputes.
Guna Mahto v. Jharkhand State
The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges due to insufficient circumstantial evidence and failure of the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Guna Mahto v. State of Jharkhand
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the murder conviction due to failure of the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, emphasizing the necessity of a complete chain of circumstantial evidence and the impact of non-examination of the Investigating Officer.
Guna Mahto v. Jharkhand State
The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in a murder case due to failure of the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt based on circumstantial evidence and non-examination of the investigating officer.
Guna Mahto v. State of Jharkhand
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the murder conviction due to failure of prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, emphasizing the necessity of a complete chain of circumstantial evidence and the impact of non-examination of the Investigating Officer.
Udayakumar v. Tamil Nadu State
The Supreme Court acquitted the petitioner of murder due to lack of credible evidence and improper identification, setting aside the conviction and emphasizing the necessity of reliable eyewitness testimony and proof beyond reasonable doubt.
Udayakumar v. Tamil Nadu State
The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges due to unreliable eyewitness identification and failure of the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Udayakumar v. State of Tamil Nadu
The Supreme Court overturned the murder conviction of Udayakumar due to unreliable eyewitness identification and lack of corroborative evidence, emphasizing the necessity of proof beyond reasonable doubt.
Narendrasinh Kesubhai Zala v. Gujarat State
The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in a murder case due to unreliable sole eyewitness testimony and lack of corroborative evidence, reaffirming the principle that conviction requires proof beyond reasonable doubt.
Narendrasinh Keshubhai Zala v. Gujarat State
The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges due to unreliability of the sole eyewitness and lack of corroborative evidence, emphasizing that doubt cannot replace proof in criminal convictions.
Narendrasinh Keshubhai Zala v. State of Gujarat
The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges due to unreliable sole eyewitness testimony and lack of corroborative evidence, emphasizing the necessity of trustworthy evidence for conviction.
29e03db4d6d479bec2c4c121f304a237ef8efc7a5b5c5841cbda88e2ce856a3f
The High Court upheld the murder conviction under Section 302 IPC based on credible eyewitness and medical evidence, dismissing the appellant's appeal.
Ravasaheb @ Ravasahebgouda v. State of Karnataka
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of eight accused for murder based on credible testimony of a single eyewitness and principles of vicarious liability under Section 149 IPC, dismissing the appeals for lack of merit.