Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Mr. Sparsh Bhargava, Adv. v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CGST .....
The Delhi High Court held that a service provider rendering Market Research Services directly to a foreign entity is not an intermediary under IGST Act and is entitled to refund of integrated tax paid on zero-rated supplies.
Swati Bhalchandra Nilegaonkar v. Union of India
The Bombay High Court held that removal from service after 26 years for contesting elections without intimation was disproportionate and remitted the matter for reconsideration of penalty.
M/s Crane Process Flow Technologies Pvt. Ltd v. Mr. Amol V. Waghmale
The Bombay High Court upheld the Labour and Industrial Courts' interference with perverse departmental enquiry findings against a trade union leader, dismissing the employer's writ petition challenging the same.
Pratibha Sadanand Shetty v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that a Director authorizing transfer of misappropriated funds can be prima facie held liable as the company's 'alter ego', dismissing the petition to quash the FIR under criminal breach of trust and related offences.
Balu Sudam Khalde and Another v. State of Maharashtra
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC, affirming the reliability of eyewitness evidence and binding nature of incriminating defence suggestions in cross-examination.
Balu Sudam Khalde v. Maharashtra State
The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction under Section 302 IPC, affirming the reliability of eyewitness evidence and rejecting the appellants' claim of culpable homicide under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC.
09ab955baa21d282e249ecdb8dd8d6b60aa56b843c54febda82a60f61fbfafa3
The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction based on credible eyewitness and medical evidence, affirming strict application of Section 300 IPC exceptions and procedural safeguards.
Balu Sudam Khalde and Another v. State of Maharashtra
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC, affirming the reliability of eyewitness testimony and rejecting the applicability of Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC.
Em Kishore v. Kashav & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that a second eviction suit is barred by res judicata when the first suit was dismissed for failure to prove the landlord-tenant relationship, and such dismissal is a final adjudication under Order 7 Rule 11(1)(g) CPC.
Prem Kishore & Ors v. Brahm Prakash & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that dismissal of an eviction petition for failure to produce evidence under Order 17 Rule 2 CPC is not a decision on merits and does not bar a subsequent eviction petition on the same issue under the doctrine of res judicata.
Em Kashor v. Kashav & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that a second eviction petition is barred by res judicata if the landlord-tenant relationship was not established in the first petition dismissed on merits, and upheld dismissal under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.
Prem Kishore & Ors v. Brahm Prakash & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that dismissal of an eviction petition for default without evidence under Order 17 Rule 2 CPC is not a decision on merits and does not bar a subsequent eviction petition by res judicata, thus allowing the appeal and setting aside the High Court's order rejecting the plaint.
Prasanta Kumar Sahu v. Charulata Sahu
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision on partition shares, clarified the prospective application of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 granting daughters coparcenary rights, and dismissed the appellants' letters patent appeal.
Prasanta Kumar Sahoo v. Charulata Sahu
The Supreme Court upheld daughters' equal coparcenary rights under the 2005 Amendment, invalidated a challenged settlement deed, and affirmed partition shares accordingly.
Geeta v. Divisional Commissioner
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the lawful termination of membership of the appellant's deceased husband by the cooperative society for non-payment of dues after due procedure was followed.
Geeta v. Divisional Commissioner
The court upheld the lawful cancellation of membership in a cooperative housing society due to non-payment of dues, affirming procedural compliance and dismissal of the appellant's challenge.
Geeta & Ors. v. Financial Commissioner Govt. of NCT Delhi & Ors.
The Supreme Court upheld the expulsion of a cooperative society member for non-payment of dues, affirming that procedural lapses do not invalidate expulsion when substantive default is established.
Anwar v. Haryana State
The High Court allowed the appeal and acquitted the appellant due to serious doubts in prosecution evidence and questionable recovery of a weapon.
Anwar @ Bhugra v. State of Haryana
The Supreme Court set aside the appellant's conviction under Sections 394, 397 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act due to serious discrepancies in prosecution evidence and doubtful recovery of the weapon.
CCE, AURANGABAD v. M/S VIDEOCON INDUSTRIES LTD
The Supreme Court upheld CESTAT’s classification of imported LCD panels under Chapter 90.13.8010 as Liquid Crystal Devices, rejecting revenue’s claim for classification under Chapter 85 parts headings.