Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
P. V. Nidheesh v. Kerala State Wakf Board
The Supreme Court held that the 2013 penal amendments to the Wakf Act cannot be applied retrospectively to criminalize possession predating the amendment, quashing prosecution against long-standing occupants under Section 52A.
P. V. NIDHISH & ORS v. KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD & ANR
The Supreme Court held that the penal provision criminalizing unauthorized possession of wakf property cannot be applied retrospectively to possession predating the amendment, quashing the prosecution against long-term tenants.
Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited & Ors v. Sri. B. G. Manamohana
The Supreme Court held that additional pay revision linked to performance targets cannot be granted automatically or retrospectively without fulfilling stipulated conditions, partially allowing the appeal of Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation.
Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited & Ors v. Sri. B. G. Manamohana
The Supreme Court held that additional pay revision increments are conditional on performance targets and cannot be granted automatically from appointment date to employees appointed after the pay revision effective date.
Rajasthan v. Dr. Hami Singh Chauhan & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that absorption into Dairy Federations terminated the appellants' Rajasthan State service and pension rights under Rule 18(2) of the Rajasthan Service Rules, dismissing their claim for State pension benefits.
State of Rajasthan v. Dr. Hamir Singh Chouhan
The Supreme Court held that permanent absorption in the Dairy Federations terminates lien with the State Government, denying respondents pensionary benefits from the State after receiving retirement benefits from the Dairy Federations.
Sachit Kumar Singh & Ors. v. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.
The Supreme Court remanded a police recruitment case for fresh consideration of objections to answer keys raised by candidates narrowly missing qualifying marks, emphasizing merits over technicalities.
Satrichit Kumar Singh v. Jharkhand State
The Supreme Court remanded the recruitment examination objections for fresh consideration with expert opinion, holding that delayed objections and uniform errors do not automatically bar relief but must be examined on merits.
Sachit Kumar Singh & Ors. v. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.
The Supreme Court remanded the case for fresh consideration of objections to examination answer keys raised by candidates narrowly failing minimum qualifying marks, directing the High Court to obtain expert opinion and decide on merits.
Santosh @ Bhure v. State (G.N.C.T.) of Delhi; State (G.N.C.T.) of Delhi v. Neeraj
The Supreme Court held that specimen handwriting obtained during investigation is admissible and does not violate self-incrimination rights, but acquitted one accused for lack of proof while upholding the other's murder conviction based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence.
Santosh @ Bhure v. State (G.N.C.T.) of Delhi; State v. Neeraj
The Supreme Court upheld Santosh's murder conviction but acquitted Neeraj, holding that specimen handwriting obtained during investigation is admissible and does not violate the right against self-incrimination.
Uday Pratap Thakur v. The State of Bihar
The Supreme Court upheld that only a proportionate period of work charged service counts towards pension qualifying service after regularization under the 2013 Rules, dismissing the claim for full counting of work charged service.
Uday Pratap Thakur v. State of Bihar
The Supreme Court upheld that only a proportionate period of work charged service counts towards pension qualification after regularization, dismissing the claim to count the entire work charged service for pension.
Boheri Devi v. Uttar Pradesh State and Others
The Supreme Court held that further investigation after filing of charge sheet requires prior Magistrate's approval and quashed the order permitting CB-CID investigation without such approval.
Bohatie Devi v. State of Uttar Pradesh
The Supreme Court held that the Secretary (Home) cannot order reinvestigation by another agency post chargesheet without prior Magistrate approval, quashing the transfer of investigation to CBCID.
Bohatie Devi v. State of Uttar Pradesh
The Supreme Court held that the Secretary (Home) cannot order reinvestigation by another agency after chargesheet without prior Magistrate approval, quashing the order transferring investigation to CBCID.
The Belgaum Urban Development Authority v. Dhruva
The Supreme Court held that without explicit contractual clauses, a development authority cannot demand additional price from allottees on account of enhanced compensation for land acquisition beyond adjustments for plot size variation.
The Belgaum Urban Development Authority v. Dhruva
The Supreme Court held that without a specific contractual clause, a development authority cannot demand additional price from allottees on account of enhanced compensation for land acquisition.
Prakash Aggarwal v. Ganesh Benzoplast Limited
The Supreme Court held that criminal proceedings alleging fraud in the sale of pledged shares authorized under contract and subject to arbitration amounted to abuse of process and quashed the complaint.
Prakash Aggarwal v. Ganesh Benzoplast Limited
The Supreme Court held that authorized sale of pledged shares under contract terms does not constitute criminal breach of trust, and criminal proceedings parallel to arbitration constitute abuse of process, allowing the appeal and quashing the complaint.