Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Medipol Pharmaceutical India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the Arbitrator's refusal to stay a five-year debarment of a pharmaceutical supplier for repeated sub-standard medicines, emphasizing public health over financial loss and limited judicial interference in arbitral interim orders.
Avtar Singh v. Enforcement Directorate
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail applications as infructuous where petitioners were not formally arrested in a PMLA case but recalled production warrants and directed their release if not required in other cases.
Dr Hans Raj & Anr. v. Anand Kamal Goel
The Delhi High Court held the respondent guilty of contempt for wilful breach of payment undertakings under a settlement MoU and sentenced him to imprisonment for non-compliance despite multiple opportunities.
Cable News Network Inc v. CTVN Calcutta Television Network Pvt Ltd
Delhi High Court held it has territorial jurisdiction over a trademark infringement suit against a defendant using allegedly infringing marks via an interactive website targeted at Delhi consumers.
M/S Lancers Network Ltd v. Rakhi Varma
The Delhi High Court upheld death compensation under the Employees’ Compensation Act for employment-related mental stress and directed recalculation based on actual last drawn wages, rejecting adjustment of prior ex-gratia payments.
Sarbaj Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted respondents three weeks to file a delayed counter-affidavit with a conditional cost penalty for non-compliance, balancing procedural fairness and judicial efficiency.
Mohammed Akmam Uddin Ahmed & Ors. v. Commissioner Appeals Customs and Central Excise & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed waiver of mandatory pre-deposit under Section 129E of the Customs Act for poor appellants challenging arbitrary valuation and penalties on seized Agarwood, enabling appeals to be heard on merits.
Mumtiyaj Ali v. SDM Karawal Nagar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed inquiry into allegations of coercion by officials in riot compensation claims and emphasized transparent, fair disbursement under judicial supervision.
Maya v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court condoned delay and remanded a dismissed compensation claim back to the Railway Claims Tribunal for adjudication on merits, emphasizing liberal interpretation of limitation in cases of poverty and hardship.
Surender Singh Dalal v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed grant of one notional increment for pensionary benefits to a retired Central Government employee, following binding precedent upheld by the Supreme Court.
Shell Brands International AG v. The Registrar of Trade Marks
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal against refusal of a trademark application, holding that objections under Sections 11 and 9(1)(b) require proper substantiation and that filing a user affidavit is discretionary under Rule 27 of the Trade Marks Rules.
MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP & ANR. v. NEPTUNE LIFE SCIENCES PVT. LTD. & ANR.
The Delhi High Court decreed the suit against Defendant No. 1 in terms of a lawful and binding settlement agreement reached through court mediation, while proceedings against Defendant No. 2 continue.
Leela Gaur v. President General Council Institute of Physically Handicapped & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal holding that the appellant was entitled to the revised pay scale of Rs. 5500-9000 for Primary Teacher (Senior Scale) as per the 2002 Government of India circular, overruling the subsequent circular that erroneously fixed a lower pay band.
dedbd088fec1dcf52dc6a0e12b6e44e24465d5893946e62361940df0741a71b0
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the accused for kidnapping, rape, and murder under Sections 366, 376, and 302 IPC, affirming the correct appreciation of evidence by the lower courts.
Ramishetty Vankatanna v. Jamal Shaheb & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that a suit cannot be dismissed at the threshold under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on limitation grounds without proper inquiry, allowing the appeal and remanding the matter for trial.
Ramisetty Venkatanna v. Nasyam Jamal Saheb
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and held that the plaint was liable to be rejected under Order VII Rule XI CPC as it was barred by limitation and disclosed no cause of action due to clever drafting to circumvent limitation law.
Ramishetty Vankatanna v. Jamal Shaheb & Ors.
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and struck out the suit as barred by limitation and lacking cause of action under Order VII Rule 11 CPC in a property partition dispute.
Ramisetty Venkatanna v. Nasyam Jamal Saheb
The Supreme Court held that a plaint cleverly drafted to circumvent limitation and lacking a clear cause of action is liable to be rejected under Order VII Rule XI CPC, allowing the appeal and setting aside lower court orders.
Veena Vadini Teachers Training Institute v. State of Madhya Pradesh
The Supreme Court upheld residence-based reservation in professional education but struck down 75% reservation as excessive, directing the State to limit it to 70% based on actual data.
Veena Vadini Teachers Training Institute v. State of Madhya Pradesh
The Supreme Court upheld residence-based reservation in professional education but struck down 75% reservation as excessive, directing the State to limit it to 70% considering ground realities.