Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Devender Kumar v. Kusum Lata
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the Family Court's order directing the appellant to pay ₹6,000 monthly maintenance to the respondent wife and children under Section 24 of The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
SHRI UGGARSAIN v. GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY & ANR.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to expeditiously consider the petitioner's complaint regarding a disputed mutation order and grant him a hearing before taking any decision.
The Indian Hotels Company Limited v. Vivanta Hospitality Private Limited
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Indian Hotels Company Limited, restraining the defendant from infringing the well-known trademark "VIVANTA" and ordered transfer of the domain name and destruction of infringing materials.
Sunil Kumar & Anr. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's dismissal of the petitioners' claim for pension benefits based on muster roll engagement and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication with a reasoned order.
Gaurav Kharb v. GNCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the skill test selection process for Assistant Grade-III post, holding that candidates who appeared and failed cannot challenge the process and that the late notification of typing speed did not cause prejudice.
Paramjeet v. Ashok Mittal
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition challenging the closure of the right to lead evidence post-COVID-19, directing the Trial Court to grant an opportunity considering medical conditions and pandemic disruptions.
GRUPO PETROTEMEX S.A. DE C.V. v. CONTROLLER OF PATENTS
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal against the Patent Office's rejection of a patent application for lack of inventive step, holding that the rejection was improper as the objection was not raised in the hearing notice and remanded the matter for fresh consideration with due opportunity to the appellant.
NK PH ALOKA PRADHAN v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending annual leave application within ten days, ensuring timely administrative action.
VEXIM v. The Controller of Patents
The Delhi High Court set aside a cryptic patent rejection order for lack of inventive step, holding that the Controller must pass a reasoned order analyzing prior art and inventive step before refusing a patent.
IMPRESARIO ENTERTAINMENT AND HOSPITALITY PVT. LTD. v. M/S. ORANGEBELLY FOOD AND BEVERAGES PVT. LTD. & ANR.
The Delhi High Court recorded a settlement in a trademark dispute recognizing the plaintiff's prior rights in 'SOCIAL' and decreed the suit accordingly under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.
Varabhay Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner suffering from paralysis, set aside earlier magistrate orders, and imposed conditions to ensure investigation integrity.
Ajay Kumar Azad v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner’s pending annual leave application within ten days, ensuring timely administrative action.
Naveen Kumar Dalal v. Neelam Kadyan
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's closure of the husband's right to cross-examine in a decade-long matrimonial dispute, emphasizing the need to prevent undue delay and granting a final opportunity subject to costs.
Punjab Kesari Publishing House Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. Ajit Singh Buland & Ors.
The Delhi High Court decreed a trademark infringement suit in terms of a lawful settlement agreement between the parties, thereby ending the litigation.
HAV NA SHYAM SHANKER PRAJAPATI v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner’s pending annual leave application within ten days, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp v. Solitaire Pharmacia Private Limited
The Delhi High Court decreed a patent infringement suit in terms of a lawful settlement agreement reached through court mediation, binding the parties and disposing of the suit.
HAV/NA Vijay Kumar Saini v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner’s pending annual leave application within ten days, emphasizing timely administrative action.
Dr. Lata Maitri & Ors. v. State of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for Letters of Administration, holding that the husband is the sole heir under Hindu Succession Act and Australian law governs the superannuation funds, excluding the petitioners' claim.
ASI Gajender Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the transfer of a CISF personnel, holding that transfer decisions are administrative and courts should not interfere absent exceptional circumstances.
Saregama India Limited v. Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed framing an additional issue on rendition of accounts despite delay but dismissed the plaintiff's application for late filing of additional documents for lack of reasonable cause in a commercial copyright infringement suit.