Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Mirza Ahmed Baig alias Asad v. Mirza Afser Baig & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed petitions for rectification of the Trade Marks register by removing marks registered in favor of Respondent 1 by consent, without adjudicating on merits, to maintain family peace.
Vikram Singh and Anr. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the Railway Claims Tribunal's rejection of compensation for a deceased passenger, holding that the claimant failed to prove bonafide passenger status in absence of the journey ticket.
GEA Refrigeration Netherlands NV & Anr. v. Metalex Cryogenics Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court decreed a patent infringement suit based on a lawful settlement agreement acknowledging patent validity and mutual releases between the parties.
M/S Shakumbhari Straw Products Ltd & Anr. v. M/S Jagran Prakashan Limited
The Delhi High Court held that an order under Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act directing deposit of fine can be passed after suspension of sentence during appeal and dismissed the petition challenging such order.
COREIP TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
The Delhi High Court stayed the debarment of CoreIP Technology Pvt. Ltd. by DoT for alleged false local content declarations, holding that DoT’s local content requirements prevail for telecom products and allowing interim participation in procurement outside DoT pending final adjudication.
Kamlesh Gupta v. Vakeel Ahmad
The Court upheld the Trial Court's discretion to allow delayed payment of court fee under Section 149 CPC, holding that such payment relates back to the suit's institution date and the plaint cannot be rejected on that ground.
M/S ONICRA CREDIT RATING AGENCY INDIA LTD. v. ROHAN KUMAR
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against dismissal of an application to set aside an ex-parte decree, holding that misplacing duly served summons due to office shifting does not constitute sufficient cause under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC.
M/S MIRC ELECTRONICS LIMITED v. SHASHANK GUPTA
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's finding that the employee was a workman illegally terminated without due process, affirming compensation in lieu of reinstatement and back wages.
Delhi Transport Corporation v. Sant Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT’s order directing DTC to release MACP arrears to the employee, ruling that pay arrears cannot be withheld without due process, especially after acquittal and absence of disciplinary action.
Kulwant Raj v. Director General Central Industrial Security Force
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to dispose of the petitioner's representation against his transfer within a stipulated time and allowed him to challenge any adverse decision thereafter, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
Pushp Lata Gupta v. Senior Citizen Tribunal Central District & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed expeditious disposal of a senior citizen's maintenance petition, upheld her right to occupy part of the family property, and emphasized timely tribunal orders and police protection.
Indu Bansal and Anr v. M/S Apra Builders Ltd and Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's interim order directing payment of maintenance charges pending final adjudication, allowing payments without prejudice to the appellants' rights.
Paritosh Chandiok v. Rajiv Arora
The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court’s dismissal of the petitioner’s application to recall the order closing evidence, directing reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court’s suspension of limitation during the COVID-19 pandemic.
M/S C.P.& ASSOCIATES PVT LTD v. DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award, holding that the award was not patently illegal and the contract termination and recoveries were lawful under the contract and arbitration law.
Subedar Dinesh Nair T v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging a 'severe reprimand' punishment due to inordinate delay and laches in filing the statutory complaint under the Army Act.
United India Insurance Company Ltd. v. Hari Lal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the compensation awarded to the deceased driver's parents under the Employees Compensation Act, emphasizing the limited scope of appeal under Section 30 to substantial questions of law only.
Walltracts India Pvt Ltd v. Somfy India Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that an appeal under Order 43 Rule 1 CPC is not maintainable against an order passed under Order 37 Rule 4 CPC, as Order 37 CPC is a complete code governing summary suits and setting aside ex-parte decrees.
Uttar Pradesh Kho Kho Federation v. Kho Kho Federation of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Kho Kho Federation of India to grant affiliation to the Uttar Pradesh Kho Kho Association within two weeks following court-supervised elections and prior judicial orders, emphasizing compliance with federation rules and judicial directions.
Om Prakash v. Commissioner of Police and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a compassionate appointment application on grounds of overage and adequate financial benefits to the family, affirming that such appointments are discretionary and subject to strict eligibility criteria.
Randhir Singh v. Urvashi Suri
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to condone delay in filing the written statement due to the petitioner's medical condition, setting aside the Trial Court's order and imposing compensatory costs.