Kulwant Raj v. Director General Central Industrial Security Force

Delhi High Court · 04 May 2023 · 2023:DHC:3058-DB
Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna
W.P.(C) 5821/2023
2023:DHC:3058-DB
administrative other

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to dispose of the petitioner's representation against his transfer within a stipulated time and allowed him to challenge any adverse decision thereafter, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.

Full Text
Translation output
NEUTRAL CITATION NUMBER: 2023:DHC:3058-DB
W.P.(C) 5821/2023
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 04.05.2023
W.P.(C) 5821/2023 and CM APPL. 22834/2023
KULWANT RAJ ..... Petitioner
Through: Appearance not given
VERSUS
DIRECTOR GENERAL CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE AND ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Vineet Dhanda, CGSC with Ms. Priya Mishra, Mr. Hussain Taqvi, Ms. Gurleen Kaur, Advocates and Insp.
Sanjay Kumar
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
JUDGMENT
(oral)
CM APPL.22835/2023 (exemption)

1. The application is allowed, with a direction to the applicant to file requisite legible copies of documents and annexures within four weeks.

2. The application is accordingly disposed of.

3. The petitioner in his present petition has made following prayers: a) To direct the respondents, DG CISF, New Delhi, to retain the petitioner at any CISF units of North Sector only at his fourth service tenure in terms of circular NEUTRAL CITATION NUMBER: 2023:DHC:3058-DB dated 25.09.2017. b) To quash the orders, qua petitioner dated 24.03.2023, and consequential order dated 14.04.2023 wherein petitioner has been transferred from the present unit of IGI Airport New Delhi to ONGC DAHEJ, Gujarat or in the alternative. c) To direct the respondents to defer the posting of the petitioner for at least a period of one year. d) To direct the respondents to pay cost of this litigation to the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that qua the relief sought in the present petition, the petitioner made a presentation dated 30.03.2023. However, till date there is no communication from the other side.

5. Learned counsel for the respondents had assured this court that the representation shall be disposed of on or before 25.05.2023.

6. The decision so taken shall be communicated to the petitioner within three days thereafter.

7. If the petitioner still feels aggrieved by the decision so made then he may challenge the same before the appropriate forum.

8. The petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE (NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA)

JUDGE MAY 04, 2023