Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Tarun alias Cheetah v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the murder convictions of appellants based on admissible discovery evidence under Section 27 Indian Evidence Act and unbroken circumstantial evidence, dismissing claims of false implication.
Rupinder Kaur v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that termination of a probationer on grounds of unsatisfactory performance without inquiry is valid and there is no deemed confirmation absent specific contractual or statutory provisions.
The Northern India Zonal Assembly of the Mar Thoma Church v. Income Tax Officer (Exemptions) & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the expeditious disposal of a pending income tax appeal, requiring the appellate authority to consider the entire reassessment order of a related entity and grant a personal hearing to the petitioner.
Suresh Kumar v. Municipal Corporation Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the petitioner’s right to vend under a valid certificate issued under the Street Vendors Act, 2014, directing the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to permit vending subject to compliance with prescribed terms and conditions.
Sh. Vineet Taneja & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following a genuine settlement and mutual divorce between the parties.
Vijender Kumar v. New Delhi Municipal Committee
The Delhi High Court enhanced the compensation awarded to an employee terminated for alleged misconduct, holding that compensation in lieu of reinstatement must be fair and adequate considering the employee's tenure.
The Northern India Zonal Assembly of the Mar Thoma Church v. Income Tax Officer (Exemptions) & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the expeditious disposal of a pending income tax appeal and mandated consideration of the entire reassessment order concerning a related entity to ensure proper adjudication of exemption claims under the Income Tax Act.
Pruthviraj Sahebrao Jachak v. State of Maharashtra
The High Court upheld the Election Officer's rejection of objections to the provisional voters list, holding that the amended MCS Act abolished active/non-active member classification and limited the Election Officer's jurisdiction in election disputes.
Pruthviraj Sahebrao Jachak v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court upheld the election officer's rejection of objections to the provisional voters list, holding that the amended MCS Act abolished the active/non-active member classification and limited the election officer's jurisdiction in election roll scrutiny.
Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited v. Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation and Others
The Supreme Court upheld the denial of additional Transferable Development Rights to the appellant, holding that they failed to develop the recreational ground as required and abandoned their claim by undue delay.
Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited v. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
The Supreme Court held that appellants were not entitled to additional TDR as they failed to develop the amenity as required by law and dismissed their appeal against the rejection of additional TDR claims.
Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited v. Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation and Others
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the appellants failed to develop required facilities on acquired recreational land and abandoned their claim for additional Transferable Development Rights under Section 126 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act.
Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited v. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
The Supreme Court held that appellants were not entitled to additional TDR as they failed to develop the amenity as required, but delay in challenging the rejection did not amount to abandonment of claim.
Haryana Urban Development Authority v. Jagdeep Singh
The Supreme Court dismissed HUDA's appeal demanding excess land cost without statutory revision, upheld the respondent's rights, and imposed exemplary costs for frivolous litigation.
Haryana Urban Development Authority & Anr. v. Jagdeep Singh
The Supreme Court dismissed Haryana Urban Development Authority's appeal, holding that additional price demand is invalid without enhancement awarded under the Land Acquisition Act, and imposed costs for frivolous litigation.
Haryana Urban Development Authority v. Jagdeep Singh
The Supreme Court dismissed HUDA's appeal demanding additional land cost without official enhancement and imposed exemplary costs for frivolous litigation.
Haryana Urban Development Authority & Anr. v. Jagdeep Singh
The Supreme Court dismissed HUDA's appeal demanding additional price for a plot, holding that such demand is valid only if land cost is enhanced by competent authority under the Land Acquisition Act, and imposed costs for frivolous litigation.
T. Valsan Thr. LRs. & Ors. v. K. Kanagaraj & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that for promotion eligibility, the entire service period as Junior Engineer counts irrespective of when a Diploma holder acquires an Engineering Degree, upholding departmental practice and prior precedent.
T. Valsan Thr. LRs. & Ors. v. K. Kanagaraj & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that for promotion eligibility, the entire service period of Diploma holders who acquire degrees during service counts, affirming the interpretation in D. Stephen Joseph and dismissing the appeal.
Calcutta State Transport Corporation v. Ashit Chakraborty
The Supreme Court upheld the entitlement of an employee to pension benefits under statutory regulations despite procedural lapses and rejected the employer’s waiver argument.