Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Calcutta State Transport Corporation v. Ashit Chakraborty
The Supreme Court upheld the employee’s right to pension benefits under the 1990 Regulations despite procedural lapses by the employer and rejected the plea of waiver based on continued CPF deductions.
Angoori Devi v. Jagdish
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal upholding concurrent findings that the appellant failed to prove the Will as required by law, thereby affirming dismissal of her title suit for possession of property.
Dinesh Saigal v. Manoj Kapoor
The Delhi High Court held the respondent guilty of contempt for wilful disobedience of court orders and undertakings regarding payment of rent arrears and eviction, sentencing him to imprisonment subject to payment of dues.
Sanjay Raghunath Agarwal v. Director of Enforcement
The High Court granted bail to the appellant in a money laundering case under PMLA Section 45, emphasizing the unjustified prolonged detention without charge sheet and imposing conditions to mitigate flight risk.
Chanchal Bhagwatilal Gokhru v. Union of India
The Bombay High Court held that reopening of income tax assessment after four years requires fresh tangible material and quashed the reassessment notice issued without such material.
M/s. Aditi Constructions v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
The Bombay High Court quashed the reopening notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act for AY 2008-09, holding that mere change of opinion without failure to disclose material facts does not justify reassessment.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-19 v. Vishwashakti Construction
The Bombay High Court upheld the ITAT's decision restricting addition to 12.5% of disputed bogus purchases, recognizing that the assessee completed contracted works and thus the entire purchase amount could not be treated as bogus.
A&J Associates v. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
The Bombay High Court held that reopening of income tax assessment beyond four years is impermissible if based on a mere change of opinion without new material, quashing the reassessment notice and order.
Koushik Jagathalaprathaban v. Karishma Ashokkumar Upadhyay
The Bombay High Court held that custody orders under the Hindu Marriage Act can be modified in the child's interest even after a consent divorce decree, while guardianship must be sought under the Guardianship and Wards Act.
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Purnima Rajesh Parikh
The Bombay High Court upheld insurer's liability under a comprehensive policy for death of an employee occupant in a motor accident, rejecting insurer's plea of drunken driving breach raised first on appeal, and enhanced compensation with interest to claimants.
The State of Maharashtra v. Rajesaheb Yashwant Rane
The Bombay High Court upheld the acquittal of a Talathi accused of corruption due to unreliable prosecution evidence, inadmissible digital recordings, and invalid sanction for prosecution.
Manekbben Rama Tandel & Dharmesh Sukkar Tandel v. The Collector, Daman & Ors.
The Bombay High Court quashed land acquisition notifications and awards for non-compliance with mandatory procedural requirements under the Land Acquisition Act, emphasizing strict adherence to Sections 4, 6, 11, and 15 for valid acquisition.
Radheshyam Jangad v. Shanti Pralhad Sakla & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that a purported oral judgment and related documents were forged, recalled earlier orders, stayed proceedings, and directed criminal action for fabrication of court records affecting administration of justice.
Padmavati Agro Industries v. Aviraj Agro Commodities Pvt Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court recorded a settlement in a trademark and copyright infringement suit recognizing the plaintiff's proprietary rights and ordering cessation of infringement, destruction of infringing materials, and lawful disposal of seized goods.
Vikas v. State (Govt NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable FIR under Sections 324/34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce decree, emphasizing the court's power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Premwati v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed fresh consideration of a wrongful demolition claim by verifying revenue records and demarcation reports, granting the petitioner relief to reconstruct her wall after proper boundary identification.
Amit Katara v. M/S Gold Souk Infrastructures Private Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission to expeditiously dispose of pending execution proceedings, emphasizing its limited supervisory role under Article 227 without adjudicating merits.
Inder Singh v. Income Tax Officer
The High Court allowed the appeal directing the Tribunal to reconsider its order on unexplained cash credit addition for AY 2009-10 in light of a subsequent favorable order for AY 2010-11.
Rahul Sharma v. The State, Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside a transfer order passed without hearing the petitioner and remanded the matter for fresh hearing in accordance with principles of natural justice under Section 24 CPC.
Raquel Shefali Fernandez v. Equestrian Federation of India
The Delhi High Court held that an OCI cardholder minor equestrian player is not entitled to equal participation rights in national events but may participate as a hors concours entry, consistent with government policy and the Citizenship Act.