Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Commissioner of Income Tax - International Taxation -3 v. Zaheer Mauritius
The Delhi High Court condoned delay in re-filing tax appeals concerning gains from CCD transfers and stayed the matter pending the Supreme Court's decision on the taxability under the India-Mauritius DTAA.
Anil Kumar Chandra Prakash Shah v. Securities and Exchange Board of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Company Court's orders in the winding up of a mutual fund, holding that locus standi of a party must be determined by the Company Court before restraining its participation in disbursal proceedings.
M/S SAHU EXPORTS v. ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR.
The Delhi High Court quashed the reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2011-12, holding that the Assessing Officer failed to apply independent mind and had no valid reason to believe that income had escaped assessment.
Shree Shyam Metals v. The Commissioner of Goods and Service Tax Delhi East & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration without proper notice and opportunity to be heard is invalid and directed cancellation to be effective only from the date of business closure.
Neelkanth Metal v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a vague Show Cause Notice proposing GST registration cancellation for lack of specific allegations and lifted the suspension, directing proper procedure for any future action.
Ms. Arunima Dwivedi; Ms. Swati Jhunjhunwala; Ms. Pinky Pawar; Mr. Aakash Pathak v. National Council for Teacher Education and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the sexual harassment inquiry, holding that participation without objection bars later challenge to the inquiry's constitution and that the ICC's finding of 'not proved' was rightly accepted by the disciplinary authority.
Naresh @ Goga v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court partially allowed the appellant's appeals by ordering concurrent sentences for some POCSO offences while upholding consecutive sentencing for a heinous offence, emphasizing the stringent nature of the POCSO Act and judicious exercise of discretion under Section 427 CrPC.
Dr. Abhishek Gianchandani v. Director General, Central Reserve Police Force & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a candidate’s recruitment to the CRPF on grounds of being overweight beyond prescribed medical standards, dismissing his plea for regular appointment despite prior temporary service.
Kamlesh v. The State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed a habeas corpus petition seeking production of a missing major daughter who voluntarily stated she is married and living with her husband.
BSA Business Software Alliance, Inc. v. Tube Investments of India Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant's appeal permitting registration of the trademark 'BSA' in specified classes with agreed restrictions, enabling coexistence with the respondent's mark used in unrelated goods.
Zakaria Ahmed v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to supply the petitioner with the complete record of proceedings of the General Security Force Court within two weeks.
Aditya Sarda v. Arjun Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Trial Court's refusal to summon additional witnesses under Section 311 Cr.P.C. at a belated stage, emphasizing that such power must be exercised judiciously to prevent undue delay and abuse of process.
Society for Holistic Approach and Development v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a Public Interest Litigation is not maintainable to challenge recruitment criteria in service matters, dismissing the petition against the Probation Officer recruitment advertisement.
Sara Carriere Dubey v. Ashish Dubey
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Family Court's interim order modifying visitation rights during children's Christmas vacation, emphasizing equitable parental access despite pending related appeals.
Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that linking Aadhaar with property transactions is a policy matter beyond judicial scope but directed the government to dispose of the petitioner's representation within eight weeks.
Hena Parveen v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a Habeas Corpus petition for a missing minor after police efforts proved unsuccessful, directing monthly status reports and communication with the petitioner.
Sheikh Mohd. Umar v. State & Ors.
The High Court held that police must mandatorily register an FIR upon information disclosing a cognizable offence of grievous hurt and directed registration and investigation, quashing lower courts' orders refusing FIR registration.
Dr. Umesh Chandra Sharma v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that members of the Veterinary Council of India continue in office until successors are elected, and appointed a Court Commissioner to supervise pending elections.
R.K. Gupta & Ors. v. Union of India through Ministry of Corporate Affairs & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that SFIO has jurisdiction to investigate and prosecute persons connected with a company under Section 212 of the Companies Act without requiring separate prior approval under Section 219, and may investigate related IPC offences under Section 436(2), dismissing the petition challenging the investigation and prosecution.
Dinesh Kumar Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to supply the petitioner with a complete copy of the General Security Force Court proceedings despite procedural defects in the earlier application.