Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
M/S Jyoti Timbers v. Amrose Singapore Pte. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking injunction against payment under a Letter of Credit, holding that failure to notify discrepancies within five banking days under UCP-600 binds the bank to honor the LC absent exceptional fraud known to the bank.
M/S Agarwalla Teak International Pvt. Ltd. v. Amrose Singapore Pte. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking to restrain payment under a Letter of Credit on grounds of alleged fraud, holding that the issuing bank must honor the LC absent timely notice of fraud under UCP-600.
M/S AGGARWAL TIMBERS PVT. LTD. v. AMROSE SINGAPORE PTE. LTD. & ORS.
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of interim injunction restraining payment under a Letter of Credit, holding that payment cannot be interdicted on alleged fraud in the underlying contract unless the negotiating bank was aware of the fraud at the time of negotiation.
Government Approved Tourist Guides Association v. Union of India
Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Ministry of Tourism's guidelines introducing Tourist Facilitators, dismissing the challenge by licensed tourist guides on grounds of reasonable classification and limited judicial review of policy.
The Commissioner of Income Tax - International Taxation -3 v. Saif Partner India IV Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeal under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act as the assessee undertook not to carry forward the claimed loss, negating prejudice to revenue.
ONGC Petro Additions Limited v. Tecnimont S.P.A & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld an international commercial arbitral award holding OPaL liable for delay damages, affirming the tribunal's contract interpretation and rejecting OPaL's challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court approved the redevelopment plan of Shri Kalkaji Mandir, rejecting ownership objections by the Mahant and emphasizing the court's supervisory role to ensure proper management and amenities for devotees.
Padam Kumar v. National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the contractual transfer and termination of the appellant by NHIDCL were lawful and in accordance with the employment agreement and principles of natural justice.
MS Renu Bala & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the executive's decision to abolish posts and dissolve an autonomous body is a policy matter beyond judicial interference absent mala fide or statutory violation, dismissing the petitioners' plea for interim relief against voluntary retirement.
Kudos Pharmaceuticals Limited & Ors. v. Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited
The Delhi High Court granted an injunction restraining Dr. Reddy's Laboratories from commercially launching Olaparib before patent expiry, permitting manufacture and export only under Section 107A of the Patents Act, 1970.
Shanti v. Gurbaksh Singh Through LRs
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's rejection of belated evidence irrelevant to tenancy, dismissing the petition challenging the dismissal of an application to summon an official witness.
Rituraj Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of an accused facing serious sexual assault charges, emphasizing the gravity of offences and non-cooperation with investigation.
Devender Dubey v. State of N.C.T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of Devender Dubey accused of impersonating an ED officer and conspiring to extort money, holding that the serious allegations and evidence warranted denial of bail at the pre-trial stage.
Darshan Harish Joshi v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Delhi High Court dismissed bail application of accused involved in a conspiracy to impersonate Enforcement Directorate officials and extort money, holding that serious allegations and material evidence justify denial of bail at the pre-trial stage.
Vinod Kumar v. State (GNCT of Delhi)
Delhi High Court granted parole to a life-convict to file a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court, holding that parole rejection was arbitrary and that filing SLP is a recognized ground for parole under prison rules.
Arshad v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that non-filing of the FSL report with the charge-sheet does not entitle an accused to default bail under NDPS Act cases absent any general direction from the Supreme Court.
Jagmohan Meena v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Tribunal's dismissal of a contempt petition, holding that the respondents complied with the Tribunal's order by issuing a reasoned order and that promotion grievances must be pursued through fresh Tribunal proceedings.
Vinod Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of Vinod Kumar accused of impersonation and extortion, holding that the serious nature of the offences and his central role in the conspiracy warranted denial of bail pending trial.
Seema Devi & Ors. v. HDFC Ergo General Insurance Co Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the MACT award with modifications on income assessment, dependency, and non-pecuniary damages, affirming retrospective application of Pranay Sethi and recognizing parents as dependents for compensation.
Salman v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused in a commercial quantity narcotics case, holding that the statutory bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act applies and bail cannot be granted without reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty.