Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Hena Parveen v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a Habeas Corpus petition for a missing minor after police efforts proved unsuccessful, directing monthly status reports and communication with the petitioner.
Sheikh Mohd. Umar v. State & Ors.
The High Court held that police must mandatorily register an FIR upon information disclosing a cognizable offence of grievous hurt and directed registration and investigation, quashing lower courts' orders refusing FIR registration.
Dr. Umesh Chandra Sharma v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that members of the Veterinary Council of India continue in office until successors are elected, and appointed a Court Commissioner to supervise pending elections.
R.K. Gupta & Ors. v. Union of India through Ministry of Corporate Affairs & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that SFIO has jurisdiction to investigate and prosecute persons connected with a company under Section 212 of the Companies Act without requiring separate prior approval under Section 219, and may investigate related IPC offences under Section 436(2), dismissing the petition challenging the investigation and prosecution.
Dinesh Kumar Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to supply the petitioner with a complete copy of the General Security Force Court proceedings despite procedural defects in the earlier application.
Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Kulwant Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's award of pay scale arrears and interest to MCD pharmacists under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, recognizing entitlement arising from established service conditions without formal employer approval.
Vinod Kumar & Anr. v. Rameshwar Dayal
The Delhi High Court fixed tentative use and occupation charges payable by the tenant for illegally constructed additional floor, directing payment during pendency of the petition.
Dr. Rajabather Women Teacher Training College v. National Council for Teacher Education and Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the NCTE's South Regional Committee to decide on the petitioner’s show cause notice within four weeks after granting a hearing opportunity, reserving the petitioner’s right to challenge the decision.
Paridhi Kumari v. Directorate of Education & Anr
Admission allotment under EWS category by the Directorate of Education is valid only for the specified academic year and does not carry over to subsequent years if relief is not sought within that year.
Harjeet Singh v. M/S Omaxe Limited
The Delhi High Court, following the Supreme Court's directions, set aside the sole arbitrator appointment and constituted a three-member arbitral tribunal as per the contract and Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Modern India Limited & Ors. v. Financial Technologies (I) Ltd. & Ors.
The Bombay High Court upheld the High Court Committee's fact-finding reports holding the LOIL Group liable to NSEL, rejecting their objections and emphasizing the Committee's limited role and parties' duty to produce documents.
Bharat Electronics Limited v. IBEX Integrated Business Express Pvt. Ltd.
The Bombay High Court held that delay in filing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act cannot be excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Act where prior writ proceedings were not prosecuted with due diligence and good faith and the writ court did not lack jurisdiction.
Ajgar Akhtar Khan v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court quashed the prior approval under Section 23(1)(a) of the M.C.O.C. Act for failure to identify the organised crime syndicate and leadership, emphasizing strict compliance with procedural safeguards before invoking the Act.
Rohan Shah v. Nishigandha Shah
The High Court held that proceedings under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act pending before a Magistrate can be transferred to the Family Court, which has jurisdiction to try such matters and grant reliefs, to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and serve ends of justice.
Manju Khanna v. Tata AIG General Insurance Co Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that the Court can extend the Arbitral Tribunal’s mandate under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act even after expiry of the original or extended period, emphasizing flexibility and party autonomy in arbitration timelines.
M/S RAJ ENTERPRISES v. SUPERINTENDENT RANGE 25 GST DIVISION NEW DELHI
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration must be based on objective criteria and fair notice, setting aside cancellation from the date of grant and limiting it to the last return filed date.
Hasrat Ali through his legal heir Hanif v. Mohd. Rahil
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court’s dismissal of an application to reject plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC, holding that the suit was not barred by law on the face of the plaint despite the property being in a notified slum area.
BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that formal amendments to criminal complaints at the pre-summoning stage are permissible to furnish better particulars without causing prejudice, and dismissed complaints cannot be based on detailed evidence appreciation or non-seizure of illegal wires under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003.
HDFC Bank Ltd v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging interlocutory orders permitting belated affidavit evidence by a witness assisting another, holding no jurisdictional error under Section 115 CPC or Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
Delhi Jal Board v. Ashok Kumar Through LRs & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Delhi Development Authority to pay compensation to Delhi Jal Board to facilitate release of attached funds in land acquisition execution proceedings, resolving the dispute amicably under its supervisory jurisdiction.