Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
K.C. Jose v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to treat the petitioner's legal notice as a representation for promotion and decide it within six weeks, allowing further legal remedies if aggrieved.
Rishi Lal Gupta v. Uttam Chemical Udyog & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the IPAB's order cancelling the petitioner's trademark registration obtained by fraud and upheld the respondent's prior rights.
Rajendra Kumar Nayak v. The State of NCT of Delhi
Bail was denied to the petitioner involved in transporting commercial quantity of ganja, as ownership of the vehicle and absconding behavior indicated involvement under the NDPS Act.
Bharat Veerangana Avantibai Educational Sansthan & Ors. v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that a writ petition challenging NPA classification and recovery notices under SARFAESI Act is not maintainable when an alternative statutory remedy exists.
Government of NCT of Delhi v. Dilawar Singh and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing a combined seniority list for Physical Education Teachers without gender distinction, mandating prospective implementation from January 1, 2022 to ensure constitutional equality and administrative feasibility.
Akhilesh Mishra v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s interim bail application on medical grounds, holding that his condition is stable and can be managed within jail facilities as per AIIMS medical board report.
Devender Sabarwal v. Raman Goyal
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a petition challenging eviction orders with liberty to file a separate title suit, clarifying that eviction proceedings' observations on title without evidence do not prejudice future suits.
Nainy Goel & Ors. v. Jawaharlal Nehru University
The Delhi High Court held that JNU can recover UGC non-NET fellowship amounts only for the overlapping period with higher fellowships and directed refund of excess recoveries.
M/S NARENDER KUMAR v. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH CENTRAL PUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT
The Delhi High Court directed reference of disputes to arbitration under a government contract after the respondent failed to refer the dispute to the Dispute Redressal Committee as required, allowing the petitioner’s Section 11(6) petition.
Nikhilesh Kesharichand Jhaveri & Ors. v. M/s. New Era Fabrics Ltd. & Ors.
The Bombay High Court upheld the appellate court's order expunging mesne profits evidence, holding that under the Bombay Amendment to Order XX Rule 12 CPC, inquiry into future mesne profits is discretionary and cannot precede a decree for possession when the amount is unascertained.
Sojar @ Rukminibai v. Krishnath @ Krishna S/o Gopal Tate
The High Court held that disputes regarding apportionment of compensation under the National Highways Act must be referred to the Principal Civil Court, quashed the competent authority's order deciding apportionment, and directed recall and proper adjudication of compensation claims.
Romell Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that the cost of constructing the Permanent Transit Camp cannot be included in stamp duty valuation under slum redevelopment agreements and that revision of stamp duty demands under Section 53A must be completed within six years, quashing the delayed demand notices and order.
GSP Crop Science Pvt Ltd v. Jai Farm Chemicals Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court decreed a patent infringement suit in terms of a lawful settlement under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC, binding the parties to agreed terms and dismissing further litigation.
Ranjeet Singh v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a habeas corpus petition concerning a missing minor girl, directing the State to file monthly status reports and communicate any information about her whereabouts to the petitioner.
Pushkar Raj Thakur v. Aman Joshi
The High Court directed the Trial Court to expeditiously hear and decide the petitioner's pending interim relief application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC, ensuring procedural compliance and protecting the petitioner's statutory rights.
Babita v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to remit land acquisition compensation under the National Highways Act, 1956, to the judicial authority after verifying and notifying the legal heirs of the deceased claimant.
Saroj Gupta & Anr. v. Som Nath Setia & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a third party affected by a decree can maintain a regular first appeal under Section 96 CPC with leave of the Court and set aside the dismissal of such appeal for non-consideration of impleadment challenges.
The Commissioner of Income Tax – International Taxation -1 v. A B SCIEX PTE LTD.
The Delhi High Court condoned delay in tax appeals and remitted the matter to the Tribunal to decide on arm's length pricing and profit attribution issues, allowing further statutory appeals.
The Commissioner of Income Tax – International Taxation -1 v. DXC Technology Services Singapore Pte. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's ruling that consideration received for sale of off-the-shelf software without transfer of copyright does not constitute royalty under the India-Singapore DTAA.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -1 v. Amrapali Silicon City Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court closed multiple income tax appeals involving Amrapali Group companies undergoing insolvency, allowing revival once clarity on procedural issues is obtained.