Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Decision delivered on: 21.12.2023
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1 ..... Appellant
Through: Mr Aseem Chawla, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms Pratishtha and Mr
Aditya Gupta, Advocates.
Through: None.
(5)
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1 ..... Appellant
(7)
Through: Mr Aseem Chawla, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms Pratishtha and
Mr Aditya Gupta, Advocates.
(8)
(10)
PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI 1 ..... Appellant
Through: Mr Sanjeev Menon, Standing Counsel.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL):
JUDGMENT
1. These appeals concern Assessment Years (AYs) 2011-12 [ITA NO. 329/2022], 2014-15 [ITA No. 337/2022], 2012-13 [ITA No. 340/2022], 2011-12 [ITA No.341/2022], 2010-11 [ITA No. 343/2022], 2012-13 [ITA No. 345/2022] and 2011-12 [ITA No. 646/2023].
2. While ITAs 329/2022, 337/2022, 340/2022 assail the order dated 17.03.2021 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [in short, “Tribunal”], ITA 341/2022, 343/2022 and 345/2022 assail the order dated 08.04.2021 and ITA 646/2023 assails the order dated 17.06.2021.
2.1. In the orders dated 08.04.2021 and 17.06.2021, the Tribunal has relied upon the order dated 17.03.2021 and dismissed the appeals filed by the assessee and the revenue in view of the respondent/assesse undergoing Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).
3. We have been informed several times by the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the appellant/revenue that the respondents/companies, which are the part of the Amrapali Group, are undergoing insolvency proceedings.
4. We have also asked counsel for the appellant/revenue time and again as to the person upon whom notice needs to be served.
5. It was also conveyed to us that proceedings qua Amrapali Group are being looked at by the Supreme Court.
6. Since more than one year has passed without definite information, we are inclined to close the instant appeals, with liberty to the appellant/revenue to approach the court for revival, albeit as per law, as and when they obtain clarity in the above-captioned matters.
7. Consequently, the pending applications concerning condonation of delay in re-filing the appeal (i.e., CM APPL. 60497/2023 in ITA 646/2023) shall stand closed.
RAJIV SHAKDHER JUDGE GIRISH KATHPALIA JUDGE DECEMBER 21, 2023