Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -1 v. Amrapali Silicon City Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi High Court · 21 Dec 2023 · 2023:DHC:9483-DB
Rajiv Shakdher; Girish Kathpalia
ITA 329/2022
2023:DHC:9483-DB
tax appeal_dismissed Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court closed multiple income tax appeals involving Amrapali Group companies undergoing insolvency, allowing revival once clarity on procedural issues is obtained.

Full Text
Translation output
ITA 329/2022 & connected matters
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Decision delivered on: 21.12.2023
ITA 329/2022
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1 ..... Appellant
Through: Mr Aseem Chawla, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms Pratishtha and Mr
Aditya Gupta, Advocates.
VERSUS
AMRAPALI SILICON CITY PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent
Through: None.
(5)
ITA 337/2022
VERSUS
(6)
ITA 340/2022
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1 ..... Appellant
(7)
ITA 341/2022
Through: Mr Aseem Chawla, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms Pratishtha and
Mr Aditya Gupta, Advocates.
VERSUS
AMRAPALI SAPPHIRE DEVELOPERS PVT LTD ..... Respondent
(8)
ITA 343/2022
VERSUS
(9)
ITA 345/2022
(10)
ITA 646/2023 & CM APPL. 60497/2023
PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI 1 ..... Appellant
Through: Mr Sanjeev Menon, Standing Counsel.
VERSUS
M/S AMRAPALI LEISURE VALLEY DEVELOPERS
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL):
JUDGMENT

1. These appeals concern Assessment Years (AYs) 2011-12 [ITA NO. 329/2022], 2014-15 [ITA No. 337/2022], 2012-13 [ITA No. 340/2022], 2011-12 [ITA No.341/2022], 2010-11 [ITA No. 343/2022], 2012-13 [ITA No. 345/2022] and 2011-12 [ITA No. 646/2023].

2. While ITAs 329/2022, 337/2022, 340/2022 assail the order dated 17.03.2021 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [in short, “Tribunal”], ITA 341/2022, 343/2022 and 345/2022 assail the order dated 08.04.2021 and ITA 646/2023 assails the order dated 17.06.2021.

2.1. In the orders dated 08.04.2021 and 17.06.2021, the Tribunal has relied upon the order dated 17.03.2021 and dismissed the appeals filed by the assessee and the revenue in view of the respondent/assesse undergoing Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).

3. We have been informed several times by the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the appellant/revenue that the respondents/companies, which are the part of the Amrapali Group, are undergoing insolvency proceedings.

4. We have also asked counsel for the appellant/revenue time and again as to the person upon whom notice needs to be served.

5. It was also conveyed to us that proceedings qua Amrapali Group are being looked at by the Supreme Court.

6. Since more than one year has passed without definite information, we are inclined to close the instant appeals, with liberty to the appellant/revenue to approach the court for revival, albeit as per law, as and when they obtain clarity in the above-captioned matters.

7. Consequently, the pending applications concerning condonation of delay in re-filing the appeal (i.e., CM APPL. 60497/2023 in ITA 646/2023) shall stand closed.

RAJIV SHAKDHER JUDGE GIRISH KATHPALIA JUDGE DECEMBER 21, 2023