Supreme Court of India

15,092 judgments

Year:
Showing 2020 — 1206 judgments found

Gajendra Sharma v. Union of India

27 Nov 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; R. Subhash Reddy; M.R. Shah · 2020 INSC 662

The Supreme Court upheld the RBI moratorium notification charging interest during the COVID-19 moratorium period, while directing implementation of the Government's ex-gratia relief scheme compensating eligible borrowers.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant moratorium interest accrual COVID-19 pandemic Disaster Management Act, 2005

Gajendra Sharma v. Union of India

27 Nov 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; R. Subhash Reddy; M.R. Shah

The Supreme Court upheld the RBI moratorium notification charging interest during COVID-19 lockdown but disposed the petition on the Government’s relief scheme granting ex-gratia payment to eligible borrowers.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant moratorium interest on loan COVID-19 pandemic Disaster Management Act, 2005

Manohar Lal Jat v. State of Rajasthan

26 Nov 2020 · Indira Banerjee; S. Ravindra Bhat
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that seniority in the Rajasthan Commercial Taxes Department is determined by date of appointment, not selection date, thereby upholding departmental promotees' seniority over direct recruits appointed later.

service_law appeal_dismissed Significant seniority direct recruits departmental promotees Rule 27

Manohar Lal Jat v. State of Rajasthan

26 Nov 2020 · Indira Banerjee; S. Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court held that seniority in a newly created cadre is determined by date of appointment, and departmental promotees appointed earlier rank senior to direct recruits appointed later, even if the latter were selected earlier.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant seniority direct recruits departmental promotees Rule 27

Noy Vallesina Engineering SpA v. Jindal Drugs Limited

26 Nov 2020 · Indira Banerjee; S. Ravindra Bhat
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that Indian courts lack jurisdiction under Section 34 to set aside foreign arbitral awards made outside India, reaffirming that only courts at the arbitration seat have supervisory jurisdiction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 foreign arbitral award seat of arbitration

Noy Vallesina Engineering SpA v. Jindal Drugs Limited

26 Nov 2020 · Indira Banerjee; S. Ravindra Bhat
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that Indian courts lack jurisdiction under Section 34 to set aside foreign arbitral awards made outside India, affirming the territorial principle and the primacy of the seat of arbitration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 foreign award seat of arbitration

Skoda Auto Volkswagen India Private Limited v. The State of Uttar Pradesh

26 Nov 2020 · S.A. Bobde; A.S. Bopanna; V. Ramasubramanian · 2020 INSC 661

The Supreme Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of an FIR against Volkswagen for alleged emission cheat devices, holding that police investigation cannot be barred by pending civil appeals and that quashing of FIRs is to be sparingly exercised.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant FIR quashing defeat device emission norms NGT order

Skoda Auto Volkswagen India Private Limited v. The State of Uttar Pradesh

26 Nov 2020 · S.A. Bobde; A.S. Bopanna; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that the pendency of civil appeals does not bar investigation into a criminal complaint alleging installation of defeat devices in vehicles and dismissed the petition seeking quashing of the FIR.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant defeat device emission norms quashing of FIR National Green Tribunal

Director General of Police, Railway Protection Force v. Rajendra Kumar Dubey

25 Nov 2020 · Indu Malhotra; Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; K. M. Joseph · 2020 INSC 656
Cites 5 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court restored the order of compulsory retirement of a Railway Protection Force officer, holding that the High Court erred in reappreciating evidence and substituting its own findings in departmental disciplinary proceedings.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant departmental enquiry compulsory retirement judicial review writ jurisdiction

Director General of Police, Railway Protection Force v. Rajendra Kumar Dubey

25 Nov 2020 · Indu Malhotra; Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; K. M. Joseph
Cites 5 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in setting aside the compulsory retirement of a Railway Protection Force officer, affirming limited judicial interference in departmental enquiries and restoring the disciplinary order.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant departmental enquiry compulsory retirement Railway Protection Force Rules writ jurisdiction

Jatinderveer Arora & Ors. v. State of Punjab

25 Nov 2020 · Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court dismissed petitions seeking transfer of sacrilege-related criminal trials from Punjab, holding that fair trial is possible there and transfer powers under Section 406 CrPC must be sparingly exercised only in exceptional cases.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant transfer of trial Section 406 CrPC fair trial communal atmosphere

Jatinderveer Arora & Ors. v. State of Punjab

25 Nov 2020 · Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court dismissed petitions seeking transfer of sacrilege-related criminal trials from Punjab, holding that no compelling evidence of inability to get a fair trial in Punjab was established.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant transfer of trial Section 406 CrPC fair trial communal atmosphere

Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd. v. Union of India

25 Nov 2020 · M.R. Shah; Ashok Bhushan; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court held that the High Court must decide the constitutional validity of Section 40(a)(iib) of the Income Tax Act on merits despite pending assessment proceedings and remanded the matter for such adjudication.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 40(a)(iib) Income Tax Act constitutional validity Article 226 jurisdiction show cause notice

Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd. v. Union of India

25 Nov 2020 · M.R. Shah; Ashok Bhushan; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court held that the High Court must decide the constitutional validity of Section 40(a)(iib) of the Income Tax Act on merits despite pending assessment proceedings and remanded the matter for such adjudication.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 40(a)(iib) Income Tax Act constitutional validity Article 226 jurisdiction challenge to vires

Chief Executive Officer Gujarat Maritime Board v. Asiatic Steel Industries Ltd

24 Nov 2020 · Indira Banerjee; S. Ravindra Bhat · 2020 INSC 654
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld refund of contract consideration with interest payable from the actual payment date, condemning the Board's arbitrary withholding of funds and affirming fair treatment by public authorities.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant refund with interest public authority liability contract breach ship-breaking plot allotment

Chief Executive Officer Gujarat Maritime Board v. Asiatic Steel Industries Ltd

24 Nov 2020 · Indira Banerjee; S. Ravindra Bhat
Cites 2 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the refund of contract consideration with interest payable from the date of payment, emphasizing the Board's liability for arbitrary withholding and the need for fair treatment in public contracts.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant refund interest contract breach public authority liability

Tej Bahadur v. Shri Narendra Modi

24 Nov 2020 · S. A. Bobde; A. S. Bopanna; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal holding that a candidate whose nomination lacks the mandatory certificate under Section 33(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 is not duly nominated and lacks locus standi to challenge an election.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Representation of the People Act, 1951 Election Petition Nomination papers Certificate from Election Commission

Tej Bahadur v. Shri Narendra Modi

24 Nov 2020 · S. A. Bobde; A. S. Bopanna; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal holding that a person whose nomination is invalid for non-compliance with mandatory certificate requirements under the Representation of the People Act, 1951, is not a duly nominated candidate and lacks locus standi to challenge an election.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Election Petition Locus Standi Nomination Paper Representation of the People Act, 1951

B. K. RAVICHANDRA v. UNION OF INDIA

24 Nov 2020 · Indira Banerjee; S. Ravindra Bhat
Cites 2 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that prolonged possession of requisitioned lands beyond the statutory period without lawful acquisition or compensation violates the constitutional right to property and directed the Union to restore possession and pay compensation.

property appeal_allowed Significant Requisitioning Act, 1952 Defence of India Act, 1962 Article 300A Right to property

B. K. RAVICHANDRA v. UNION OF INDIA

24 Nov 2020 · Indira Banerjee; S. Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court held that prolonged possession of requisitioned land beyond the statutory period without valid acquisition or compensation violates the constitutional right to property and directed the Union to restore possession to the appellants.

property appeal_allowed Significant Requisitioning Act, 1952 Defence of India Act, 1962 Article 300A Right to property