Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

Parkash Chand v. State of Himachal Pradesh

12 Feb 2019 · Ranjan Gogoi; Sanjay Kishan Kaul; K.M. Joseph

The Supreme Court set aside the appellant's conviction for rape and criminal intimidation due to unreliable prosecution evidence and unjustified delay in lodging the FIR.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant rape delay in FIR extra-judicial confession benefit of doubt

Dealers Association Bundi v. Sanyojak Bundi Zila Petrol Pump Mazdoor Sangh

12 Feb 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court set aside an ex parte industrial award and remanded the case for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the right of parties to a fair opportunity to contest disputes on merits.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ex parte award opportunity to be heard natural justice

Dealers Association Bundi v. Sanyojak Bundi Zila Petrol Pump Mazdoor Sangh

12 Feb 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court set aside an ex parte Industrial Tribunal award for failure to afford the appellant an opportunity to contest, remanding the case for fresh adjudication on merits.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ex parte award opportunity to contest natural justice

Mala Singh & Ors. v. State of Haryana

12 Feb 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of two accused, altering their conviction from murder under Section 302/34 IPC to causing hurt under Section 324 IPC due to lack of evidence of common intention, and held that alteration of charge from Section 149 IPC to Section 34 IPC requires supporting evidence to avoid prejudice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC Section 149 IPC alteration of charge

M/S SCG CONTRACTS INDIA PVT. LTD. v. K.S. CHAMANKAR INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.

12 Feb 2019 · R.F. Nariman; Vineet Saran · 2019 INSC 187

The Supreme Court held that the statutory 120-day limit for filing written statements under the amended CPC is mandatory and any order permitting filing beyond this period is void.

civil appeal_allowed Significant written statement Code of Civil Procedure Order V Rule 1 Order VIII Rule 1

M/S SCG CONTRACTS INDIA PVT. LTD. v. K.S. CHAMANKAR INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.

12 Feb 2019 · R.F. Nariman; Vineet Saran

The Supreme Court held that the statutory 120-day period for filing a written statement under the amended CPC is mandatory, and any written statement filed beyond this period shall not be taken on record.

civil appeal_allowed Significant written statement Code of Civil Procedure Order VIII Rule 1 Order VIII Rule 10

Chandru @ Chandrasekaran v. State Rep. by Deputy Superintendent

12 Feb 2019 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Deepak Gupta

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellants in a murder case due to failure of the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt on circumstantial evidence and medical inconsistencies.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence overdose murder polygraph test

Mahesh Dube v. Shivbodh

12 Feb 2019 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Deepak Gupta

The Supreme Court held that a Trial Court's order restoring possession at conviction under Section 448 IPC is enforceable beyond one month, allowing restoration despite delay in filing under Section 456 Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 456 Cr.P.C. restoration of possession forcible dispossession limitation period

Mahesh Dube v. Shivbodh

12 Feb 2019 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Deepak Gupta

The Supreme Court held that a Trial Court's order restoring possession at conviction under Section 456 Cr.P.C. is enforceable despite delay, and allowed the appellant's appeal directing restoration of possession.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 456 Cr.P.C. restoration of possession forcible dispossession limitation period

Sukhpal Singh v. State of Punjab

12 Feb 2019 · A. M. Khanwilkar; K. M. Joseph

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence including last seen testimony and forensic recovery of the accused's service revolver, rejecting the defense of suspension and absence of motive.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen theory Section 302 IPC recovery of weapon

The State Bank of India & Ors. v. Ravindra Nath & Ors.

12 Feb 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Hemant Gupta · 2019 INSC 184

The Supreme Court upheld the lawful salary reduction of a public sector bank officer posted abroad based on statutory committee recommendations and Cost of Living Index, dismissing claims of arbitrariness and contractual privity.

employment appeal_allowed Significant salary revision Cost of Living Index Standing Committee Section 18 State Bank of India Act

THE STATE BANK OF INDIA v. RAVINDRA NATH

12 Feb 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court upheld the lawful salary reduction of a bank officer posted abroad based on updated Cost of Living Index data and binding statutory committee recommendations, dismissing claims of arbitrariness and contractual entitlement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant salary revision Cost of Living Index Standing Committee State Bank of India Act, 1955

Kamal Shivaji Pokarnekar v. State of Maharashtra

12 Feb 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court held that at the stage of issuance of process, the Magistrate must only determine if a prima facie case exists and criminal proceedings cannot be quashed merely because the dispute appears civil in nature.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant prima facie case issuance of process quashing of criminal complaint civil dispute

Kamal Shivaji Pokarnekar v. State of Maharashtra

12 Feb 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court held that at the stage of issuance of process, the Magistrate must only determine if a prima facie case exists and criminal proceedings cannot be quashed merely because the dispute appears civil in nature.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant issuance of process prima facie case quashing of criminal proceedings civil dispute

Bayaji Sambhu Mali @ Borate (Lrs) v. Nazir Mohammed Balal Zari

12 Feb 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; K. M. Joseph

The Supreme Court held that where a landlord's possession application under Section 29 is rejected, the tenant is deemed purchaser under Section 32 without needing to give notice under Section 32F(1A).

property appeal_allowed Significant Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 Section 29 Section 32 Section 32F

Bayaji Sambhu Mali @ Borate (D) Through Lrs. v. Nazir Mohammed Balal Zari

12 Feb 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; K. M. Joseph

The Supreme Court held that a tenant acquires deemed purchaser status under Section 29 read with Section 32 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, upon rejection of the landlord's possession application, and thus is not required to give notice under Section 32F(1A).

property appeal_allowed Significant Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 Section 29 Section 32 Section 32F(1A)

R V PRASANNAKUMAAR & ORS v. MANTRI CASTLES PVT. LTD & ANR

11 Feb 2019 · D. Y. Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that developers must pay interest on delayed possession until actual possession is offered, overruling inadequate contractual compensation clauses under the Consumer Protection Act.

consumer_protection appeal_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 delayed possession flat purchase agreement compensation

Union of India v. Captain Gurdev Singh

11 Feb 2019 · N. V. Ramana; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that parity between Bhutan Compensatory Allowance payable to IMTRAT personnel and Foreign Allowance payable to MEA personnel was not mandated, but directed removal of nominal depression charges on BCA with immediate effect.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Bhutan Compensatory Allowance Foreign Allowance IMTRAT MEA personnel

ANJALI ARORA AND OTHERS v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

11 Feb 2019 · R. F. Nariman; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court held that pay scale parity under Regulation 4(2) is limited to employees similarly situated in post and pay scale, dismissing the petitioners' claim who held lower posts during the relevant period.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant pay scale parity National Institute Regulations Regulation 4(2) Yogeshwar Prasad case

The State of Uttar Pradesh v. Faquirey

11 Feb 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court restored the murder conviction under Section 302 IPC, holding that voluntary provocation does not reduce the offence to culpable homicide under Exception I to Section 300 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part I IPC Section 300 IPC Exception I grave and sudden provocation