Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

Deep Narayan Chourasia v. State of Bihar

25 Feb 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari · 2019 INSC 263
Cites 0 · Cited by 12

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's illegal conviction of the appellant under Section 302/149 IPC without appeal or sentence, restoring the appeals for fresh hearing and affirming the principle that conviction must be based on proper jurisdiction and procedure.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 149 IPC Section 27 Arms Act conviction without sentence

Deep Narayan Chourasia v. State of Bihar

25 Feb 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's wrongful conviction of accused under murder charges without appeal or notice, remanding the case for re-hearing to uphold principles of jurisdiction and natural justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 149 IPC Section 27 Arms Act conviction enhancement

Vinod Jain v. Santokba Durlabhji Memorial Hospital & Anr.

25 Feb 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal holding that the medical treatment and discharge of the deceased did not amount to negligence as the doctor acted with reasonable skill and care in accordance with accepted medical practice.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant medical negligence consumer complaint Bolam test reasonable skill and care

Sahakari Bank Niyamit v. Taluka Tokrekoli

25 Feb 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's inconsistent injunction order and remanded the writ petition for fresh hearing, holding that a writ petition cannot revive an interlocutory order not challenged on appeal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant injunction Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC Section 151 CPC writ petition

Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. v. Adani Power Ltd.

25 Feb 2019 · R. F. Nariman; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court upheld that carrying cost on compensation for change in law under PPAs is payable from the date of withdrawal of tax exemptions, applying the restitutionary principle embedded in the contract.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant change in law Power Purchase Agreement carrying cost restitutionary principle

Subhash Chand v. State of Punjab

25 Feb 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for rash and negligent driving causing death under Sections 279 and 304-A IPC, rejecting identity and procedural challenges and refusing probation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rash and negligent driving fatal vehicular accident identity of accused eyewitness testimony

Subhash Chand v. State of Punjab

25 Feb 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for rash and negligent driving causing death, affirming eyewitness identification and rejecting the appellant's plea for probation or sentence reduction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rash and negligent driving fatal accident eyewitness identification Section 279 IPC

Vijay Hathising Shah v. Gitaben Parshottamdas Mukhi

25 Feb 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari · 2019 INSC 265

The Supreme Court held that a belated amendment application filed when the trial is nearly complete can be rejected if not necessary for deciding the suit, restoring the Trial Court's order and setting aside the High Court's interference.

civil appeal_allowed Significant amendment of plaint belated amendment discretion of trial court partition suit

Vijay Hathising Shah v. Gitaben Parshottamdas Mukhi

25 Feb 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that a belated amendment to the plaint filed when the trial is nearly complete should be rejected if unnecessary, restoring the Trial Court's order and setting aside the High Court's contrary decision.

civil appeal_allowed amendment of plaint belated amendment trial court discretion special civil application

Shri Revansiddeshwar Pattan Sahakari Bank Niyamit v. Taluka Tokrekoli

25 Feb 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that a High Court cannot grant injunctions beyond the scope of a writ petition challenging only one appellate order and remanded the case for fresh consideration with proper reasons.

civil appeal_allowed Significant injunction Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC Section 151 CPC writ petition

Murugan & Ors. v. Kesava Gounder (Dead) Thr. Lrs. and Ors.

25 Feb 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; K. M. Joseph

The Supreme Court held that sale deeds executed by a natural guardian on behalf of a minor are voidable and must be set aside by a suit within three years under Article 60 of the Limitation Act, dismissing the appeal as barred by limitation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act Section 8 voidable sale deed limitation

K. Amarnath Reddy & Ors. v. Chairman & Managing Director, A.P.S.P.D.C.L. & Ors.

25 Feb 2019 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; SANJAY KISHAN KAUL · 2019 INSC 260

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of appointments and regularization of 7114 Junior Linemen made pursuant to 2006 notifications, set aside the High Court's re-examination of these appointments, and held that appointments beyond advertised posts require fresh notifications.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Junior Linemen appointments contract labourers reservation rules selection criteria

K. Amarnath Reddy & Ors. v. Chairman & Managing Director, A.P.S.P.D.C.L. & Ors.

25 Feb 2019 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; SANJAY KISHAN KAUL

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of appointments and regularization of Junior Linemen made pursuant to final Division Bench directions, set aside the High Court's re-examination of those appointments, and clarified that future recruitments must follow proper procedure and reservation rules.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Junior Linemen appointments contract labourers reservation rules selection criteria

Union of India & Anr. v. Ankur Gupta & Ors.

25 Feb 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; K. M. Joseph

The Supreme Court held that acquisition of foreign citizenship by prospective adoptive parents after applying as Indian residents disqualifies them from in-country adoption seniority, directing the child to be offered first to Indian parents before inter-country adoption.

family appeal_allowed Significant juvenile justice act adoption eligibility foreign citizenship overseas citizen of India

Union of India & Anr. v. Ankur Gupta & Ors.

25 Feb 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; K. M. Joseph

The Supreme Court held that acquisition of foreign citizenship by prospective adoptive parents after applying as Indian residents terminates their eligibility for in-country adoption, directing adoption under inter-country procedures instead.

family appeal_allowed Significant adoption juvenile justice act foreign citizenship overseas citizen of India

Ajay Kumar v. The State of Uttar Pradesh

22 Feb 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; Sanjay Kishan Kaul · 2019 INSC 257

The Supreme Court held that relaxation of mandatory recruitment conditions must be expressly provided in the advertisement, allowing limited relaxation only for candidates who submitted certificates before the first extended deadline, and dismissed appeals of those who submitted later.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant relaxation of recruitment rules DOEACC certificate Articles 14 and 16 public employment selection

Ajay Kumar v. The State of Uttar Pradesh

22 Feb 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court held that relaxation of recruitment eligibility criteria must be expressly provided and publicly notified, upholding relaxation only for candidates who submitted certificates before the first extended deadline and dismissing later relaxations.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant relaxation of recruitment rules DOEACC certificate Articles 14 and 16 public employment

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Dhruv Gurjar; State of Madhya Pradesh v. Tinku Sharma

22 Feb 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; M.R. Shah

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in mechanically quashing FIRs for serious non-compoundable offences solely on compromise, emphasizing that such offences affect society and require careful scrutiny before quashing under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR non-compoundable offences compromise

Anil Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

22 Feb 2019 · D. Y. Chandrachud; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court held that the appellant is entitled to employment under the Railway Board's policy for displaced persons whose entire house was demolished due to land acquisition, and directed the authorities to grant the appointment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition Railway Board policy displaced persons employment entitlement

Lullu Vas v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

22 Feb 2019 · N. V. Ramana; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar · 2019 INSC 255

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order allowing slum rehabilitation redevelopment to proceed, balancing public interest over disputed unregistered leasehold claims pending civil adjudication.

property appeal_dismissed Significant leasehold rights slum rehabilitation Maharashtra Slum Areas Act Municipal Corporation