Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

Prakash Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

13 Mar 2019 · Ranjan Gogoi; L. Nageswara Rao; Sanjiv Khanna

The Supreme Court clarified that the UPSC should empanel officers with at least six months residual service for appointment as DGP, ensuring merit-based selection and a minimum two-year tenure post-appointment, overruling practices contrary to its earlier directions.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Director General of Police minimum tenure Union Public Service Commission empanelment

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Deepak

13 Mar 2019 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court restored charges against the accused for abetment of suicide, holding that the High Court erred in discharging him without applying the correct legal test at the charge framing stage.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant abetment of suicide Section 306 IPC dying declaration revisional jurisdiction

M/S N Ramachandra Reddy v. The State of Telangana

13 Mar 2019 · S. Abdul Nazeer; R. Subhash Reddy
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the tender award to the appellant, holding that the tendering authority's re-verification process was fair and within its discretion, and judicial review is limited to the decision-making process without re-evaluating merits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant government tender judicial review Article 226 Batch Type Hot Mix Plant

Haryana Urban Development Authority v. Gopi Chand Atreja

12 Mar 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's refusal to condone a 1942-day delay in filing a second appeal by a statutory authority, dismissing the appeal on limitation grounds.

civil appeal_dismissed Section 5 Limitation Act condonation of delay second appeal inordinate delay

Haryana Urban Development Authority v. Gopi Chand Atreja

12 Mar 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, holding that a 1942-day delay in filing a second appeal by a statutory authority was inordinate and not sufficiently explained, thus justifying the High Court's refusal to condone the delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Section 5 of Limitation Act condonation of delay second appeal inordinate delay

Sheetla Devi v. State of Uttar Pradesh

12 Mar 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, holding that excess land vested in the State under the U.P. Ceiling Act cannot be revived by heirs through successive litigation without valid grounds.

property appeal_dismissed U.P. Imposition of Ceiling of Land Holdings Act, 1960 land ceiling vesting of land excess land

Dilip Mani Dubey v. M/s SIEL Ltd. & Anr.

12 Mar 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's factual finding that the workman was not in continuous service for one year, dismissed the appeal, and confirmed that payments made under Section 17-B during litigation are not recoverable.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 6-N Section 17-B continuous service

Sachin Kumar Singhraha v. State of Madhya Pradesh

12 Mar 2019 · N. V. Ramana; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; Indira Banerjee
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for rape and murder of a child based on circumstantial evidence but commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment with a minimum of 25 years without remission.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen circumstance recovery of dead body false explanation

A. Rajagopalan v. The District Collector

12 Mar 2019 · R. Banumathi; R. Subhash Reddy · (2009) 5 SCC 625

The Supreme Court held that preferential promotion treatment applies only to Direct recruits over Promotee non-graduates, placing Promotee graduates on par with Direct recruits, and directed prospective implementation of this rule from 2009 without disturbing prior promotions.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Tamil Nadu Revenue Subordinate Service Rules Rule 5(g) Direct recruit Assistants Promotee graduate Assistants

Mukesh Chand v. State (NCT) of Delhi

12 Mar 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court remanded the case for fresh consideration of quashing an FIR for electricity theft in light of compounding provisions under Section 152 of the Electricity Act following a Lok Adalat settlement.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Electricity Act, 2003 Section 152 compounding of offences quashing of FIR

Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur v. M/s Gopal Shri Scrips Pvt.Ltd.

12 Mar 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that dissolution of a company under the Companies Act does not render an Income Tax appeal infructuous and remanded the case for fresh adjudication on merits.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 560(5) Companies Act, 1956 Income Tax Act, 1961 Appeal infructuous Company dissolution

Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur v. M/s Gopal Shri Scrips Pvt.Ltd.

12 Mar 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that dissolution of a company under Section 560(5) of the Companies Act does not render an Income Tax appeal infructuous and remanded the case for fresh adjudication on merits.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Companies Act, 1956 Section 560(5) dissolution of company

Tanuku Taluk Village Officers’ Association v. Tanuku Municipality

12 Mar 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and remanded the case for fresh disposal, holding that second appeals must be decided only on properly framed substantial questions of law under Section 100 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Second Appeal Section 100 CPC Substantial Question of Law Tenant Ownership

Tanuku Taluk Village Officers’ Association v. Tanuku Municipality

12 Mar 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and remanded the case for fresh disposal, holding that a second appeal must be decided on the substantial questions of law properly framed and not dismissed on unrelated grounds.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Second Appeal Section 100 CPC Substantial Question of Law Tenant Ownership

Union of India & Ors. v. Ex. No.6492086A Sep/Ash Kulbeer Singh

11 Mar 2019 · D. Y. Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta · 2019 INSC 340

The Supreme Court upheld dismissal of an army sepoy for 302 days unauthorized absence, rejecting the Armed Forces Tribunal's order to modulate punishment and grant pension benefits.

military_law appeal_allowed Significant Army Act 1950 unauthorized absence desertion dismissal from service

Union of India & Ors. v. Ex. No.6492086A Sep/Ash Kulbeer Singh

11 Mar 2019 · D. Y. Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court upheld dismissal from service for 302 days unauthorized absence by an Army Sepoy, rejecting the Armed Forces Tribunal's order mitigating the punishment.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Army Act 1950 unauthorized absence desertion dismissal from service

Savitaben v. State of Gujarat

11 Mar 2019 · R. Banumathi; R. Subhash Reddy · 2019 INSC 342

The Supreme Court acquitted Savitaben of murder charges due to lack of corroborative evidence and absence of her name in the earliest dying declaration, granting her benefit of doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC Section 114 IPC benefit of doubt

Savitaben v. State of Gujarat

11 Mar 2019 · R. Banumathi; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court acquitted Savitaben of murder charges due to lack of corroboration and absence of her name in the earliest dying declaration, granting her benefit of doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration benefit of doubt Section 302 IPC Section 452 IPC

M/S ICOMM TELE LTD. v. PUNJAB STATE WATER SUPPLY & SEWERAGE BOARD

11 Mar 2019 · R. F. Nariman; Vineet Saran
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court struck down a contractual clause requiring a 10% deposit before invoking arbitration as arbitrary and violative of Article 14, emphasizing that such financial barriers hinder arbitration as an effective alternative dispute resolution mechanism.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration clause deposit-at-call Article 14 arbitrariness

M/S ICOMM TELE LTD. v. PUNJAB STATE WATER SUPPLY & SEWERAGE BOARD

11 Mar 2019 · R. F. Nariman; Vineet Saran
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court struck down a contractual clause requiring a 10% deposit before arbitration as arbitrary and violative of Article 14, emphasizing that such financial barriers impede the arbitration process.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration clause deposit-at-call Article 14 arbitrariness