Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

Center of Indian Trade Unions v. State of Maharashtra

11 Apr 2019 · Ranjan Gogoi; Deepak Gupta; Sanjiv Khanna · 2019 INSC 513

The Supreme Court dismissed the petition to continue the judicial commission of inquiry into the Dabhol Power Project, citing long delay and non-availability of key persons rendering further inquiry futile.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant judicial commission of inquiry Dabhol Power Project Power Project Agreement corruption allegations

Center of Indian Trade Unions v. State of Maharashtra

11 Apr 2019 · Ranjan Gogoi; Deepak Gupta; Sanjiv Khanna

The Supreme Court dismissed the petition to continue the judicial commission of inquiry into the Dabhol Power Project due to long delay and non-availability of key persons, holding that continuation would serve no useful purpose.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant judicial commission of inquiry Dabhol Power Project Power Project Agreement Maharashtra State Electricity Board

Atma Ram v. State of Rajasthan

11 Apr 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order directing a de novo trial due to violation of Section 273 CrPC, emphasizing that evidence must be recorded in the presence of the accused but such violation is curable by retrial to ensure a fair trial.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 273 CrPC presence of accused during evidence retrial death sentence confirmation

Shri N.K. Janu v. Lakshmi Chandra

10 Apr 2019 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that contempt proceedings cannot be used to re-litigate substantive disputes on regularization of daily wagers and dismissed the contempt application for exceeding jurisdiction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant daily wager regularization minimum pay scale contempt jurisdiction intermittent service

Vijay Mohan Singh v. State of Karnataka

10 Apr 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; M.R. Shah · 2019 INSC 509

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's conviction of the appellant for dowry death and murder, affirming the appellate court's power to reverse acquittal based on reliable dying declaration and re-appreciation of evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant appeal against acquittal dying declaration dowry death Section 302 IPC

Vijay Mohan Singh v. State of Karnataka

10 Apr 2019 · M.R. Shah; L. Nageswara Rao

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's conviction of the appellant for dowry death and murder, affirming that appellate courts can reverse acquittals if the trial court's findings are patently erroneous and reliable dying declarations are proved.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dying declaration appeal against acquittal dowry death Section 302 IPC

Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. v. Coastal Marine Constructions & Engineering Ltd.

10 Apr 2019 · R. F. Nariman; Vineet Saran · 2019 INSC 511

The Supreme Court held that courts must impound unstamped arbitration agreements and ensure payment of stamp duty before appointing arbitrators under Section 11, and the 2015 amendment does not override this requirement.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6A) Indian Stamp Act SMS Tea Estates

Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. v. Coastal Marine Constructions & Engineering Ltd.

10 Apr 2019 · R. F. Nariman; Vineet Saran

The Supreme Court held that an arbitration clause in an unstamped contract cannot be acted upon under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act until stamp duty and penalty are paid, and Section 11(6A) does not override the Indian Stamp Act's mandatory provisions.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration agreement Section 11 Arbitration Act Indian Stamp Act unstamped instrument

The State of Rajasthan v. Kanhaiya Lal

10 Apr 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; M.R. Shah · 2019 INSC 510

The Supreme Court restored the murder conviction under Section 302 IPC, holding that a single fatal blow with a deadly weapon on a vital part of the body suffices to prove intention to cause death.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part I IPC murder single blow

The State of Rajasthan v. Kanhaiya Lal

10 Apr 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; M.R. Shah

The Supreme Court restored the murder conviction under Section 302 IPC, holding that a single fatal blow with a deadly weapon on a vital part of the body constitutes murder regardless of prior altercation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part I IPC murder culpable homicide

Anurag Soni v. State of Chhattisgarh

09 Apr 2019 · M. R. Shah; L. Nageswara Rao

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for rape where consent was obtained by a false promise of marriage made with no intention to fulfill it, ruling such consent vitiated by misconception of fact under Section 90 IPC is invalid.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant rape consent misconception of fact Section 376 IPC

Food Corporation of India v. Rimjhim

09 Apr 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court held that possession of essential experience is paramount in recruitment and non-production of proof at the prescribed time is not fatal if the candidate can prove eligibility before final selection.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant recruitment essential qualification experience certificate possession vs proof

Shailndra Kumar Jain v. Maya Prakash Jain

09 Apr 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court held that daughters as Class I heirs are necessary parties in succession suits despite prior family partition decrees and allowed their impleadment in property disputes.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Succession Act Class I heirs family partition impleadment

Shailndra Kumar Jain v. Maya Prakash Jain

09 Apr 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court held that daughters as Class I heirs are necessary parties in suits concerning parental properties despite prior partition decrees among parents and sons, allowing their impleadment to protect inheritance rights.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Succession Act Class I heirs necessary party impleadment

Sampat Babso Kale v. State of Maharashtra

09 Apr 2019 · S. A. Bobde; Deepak Gupta

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's conviction based on dying declarations, reinstating the trial court's acquittal due to doubts about the victim's mental fitness and lack of corroboration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration appellate court powers acquittal reasonable doubt

Sampat Babso Kale v. State of Maharashtra

09 Apr 2019 · S. A. Bobde; Deepak Gupta

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's conviction based on dying declarations made under doubtful mental fitness and restored the trial court's acquittal due to lack of corroborative evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration fit state of mind painkillers appellate court powers

BASALINGAPPA v. MUDIBASAPPA

09 Apr 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; K. M. Joseph · 2019 INSC 500
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court restored the trial court's acquittal in a Section 138 NI Act case, holding that the accused successfully raised a probable defence rebutting the presumption of debt under Section 139.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138 Section 139 rebuttable presumption

Basalingappa v. Mudibasappa

09 Apr 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; K. M. Joseph
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court restored the trial court's acquittal in a Section 138 NI Act case, holding that the accused successfully raised a probable defence by questioning the complainant's financial capacity, thereby rebutting the presumption under Section 139.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 139 rebuttable presumption dishonour of cheque financial capacity

Dev Narain Shukla v. Praveen Kumar Jaggi

09 Apr 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; M. R. Shah · 2019 INSC 498

The Supreme Court held that fixing minimum qualifying marks in interview and performance appraisal is permissible under seniority-cum-merit promotion rules and directed fresh promotion list preparation accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant seniority-cum-merit promotion minimum qualifying marks interview

Dev Narain Shukla v. Praveen Kumar Jaggi

09 Apr 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court held that prescribing minimum qualifying marks in interview and performance appraisal is permissible and promotions must be made on seniority-cum-merit, setting aside the High Court's orders and directing a fresh select list accordingly.

labor appeal_allowed Significant promotion seniority-cum-merit minimum qualifying marks interview