Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

JAGDISHRAJ KHATTA v. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

26 Apr 2019 · N.V. Ramana; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's conviction for cruelty and abetment of suicide due to insufficient and suspicious evidence, affirming the Trial Court's acquittal.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC Section 306 IPC abetment of suicide cruelty

JAGDISHRAJ KHATTA v. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

26 Apr 2019 · N.V. Ramana; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's conviction for cruelty and abetment of suicide due to insufficient and suspicious evidence, affirming the Trial Court's acquittal.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC Section 306 IPC suicide cruelty

Sadayappan @ Ganesan v. State

26 Apr 2019 · N. V. Ramana; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction based on reliable circumstantial evidence, rejecting the appellant's challenge to witness credibility and confession admissibility.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence extra-judicial confession interested witness common intention

Sadayappan @ Ganesan v. State

26 Apr 2019 · N. V. Ramana; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction based on complete circumstantial evidence, reliable related witnesses, and corroborated extra-judicial confession despite the absence of the recording authority.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence extra-judicial confession interested witness common intention

Rajan v. The Home Secretary, Home Department of Tamil Nadu

25 Apr 2019 · A.M. Khanwilkar; Ajay Rastogi
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court directed the State Government to expeditiously consider the petitioner's fresh representation for premature release after over 30 years' imprisonment, holding that sentences under a struck down Arms Act provision cannot be counted and consultation with the Central Government is unnecessary.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant premature release life imprisonment remission concurrent sentences

M/s Trimex Sands Pvt. Limited v. Union of India

25 Apr 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court set aside a High Court order disposing a writ petition based on an incorrect statement by counsel and restored the petition for fresh adjudication on merits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant writ petition statement by counsel incorrect briefing disposal on merits

M/s Trimex Sands Pvt. Limited v. Union of India

25 Apr 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court set aside a High Court order disposing a writ petition solely on a counsel's statement based on incorrect briefing and restored the petition for fresh adjudication on merits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant writ petition disposal on statement merits adjudication incorrect briefing

Hirabai Thr. L.Rs. v. Ramniwas Bansilal Lakhotiya

25 Apr 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, holding that a sale of ancestral property by the Karta for legal necessity binds all family members and that the decree in favor of purchasers is binding on non-parties who failed to challenge it within limitation.

civil appeal_dismissed ancestral property sale deed Karta legal necessity

Hari Steel and General Industries Ltd. v. Daljit Singh

24 Apr 2019 · R. Banumathi; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court held that judgment on admissions under Order XII Rule 6 CPC requires clear and unconditional admissions within the suit, and serious factual disputes including forgery allegations preclude such judgment without trial, especially in suits for specific performance.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC judgment on admissions specific performance readiness and willingness

Hari Steel and General Industries Ltd. v. Daljit Singh

24 Apr 2019 · R. Banumathi; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court held that judgment on admissions under Order XII Rule 6 CPC requires clear and unconditional admissions, and serious factual disputes including forgery allegations preclude such judgment without trial, especially in suits for specific performance.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC judgment on admissions specific performance readiness and willingness

Union of India and Ors. v. Dharam Pal

24 Apr 2019 · N.V. Ramana; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court upheld the commutation of a death sentence to life imprisonment due to illegal solitary confinement, inordinate delay in mercy petition disposal, and failure to place relevant acquittal records before the President, affirming fundamental rights protections under Article 21.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant death sentence mercy petition solitary confinement Article 21

Delhi Development Authority v. Nalwa Sons Investment Ltd.

24 Apr 2019 · A.M. Khanwilkar; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court held that a court-sanctioned demerger transferring leased property between public limited companies attracts liability to pay 50% unearned increase under the lease deed, irrespective of consideration or common directorship.

property appeal_allowed Significant unearned increase lease deed demerger transfer of property

Delhi Development Authority v. Nalwa Sons Investment Ltd.

24 Apr 2019 · A.M. Khanwilkar; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court held that a transfer of leased property pursuant to a court-sanctioned demerger between public limited companies attracts liability to pay 50% unearned increase under the lease deed, regardless of consideration or common control.

property appeal_allowed Significant unearned increase lease deed demerger transfer of property

Sardara Singh & Ors. v. Land Acquisition Collector

24 Apr 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for land acquired under the Punjab Town Improvement Act, relying on prior awards in adjoining villages and awarding a uniform rate reflecting urban land value.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition compensation Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922 market value

Alka Shukla v. Life Insurance Corporation of India

24 Apr 2019 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that death due to a heart attack without bodily injury caused by an accident by outward, violent and visible means does not qualify for accident benefit under insurance policies, dismissing the appellant's claim.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant accident benefit insurance policy bodily injury accidental death

Alka Shukla v. Life Insurance Corporation of India

24 Apr 2019 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that death due to a heart attack without bodily injury caused by an accident involving outward, violent and visible means does not qualify for accident benefit under insurance policies, dismissing the appellant's claim.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant accident benefit insurance policy bodily injury accidental death

Dipakbhai Jagdishchandra Patel v. State of Gujarat

24 Apr 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; K. M. Joseph
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that charges under Sections 489B and 489C IPC cannot be framed solely on inadmissible statements of co-accused or police confessions without independent material, and discharged the appellant at the charge framing stage under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC Section 489B IPC Section 489C IPC charge framing

Cheriyath Jyothi v. Sainudeen

24 Apr 2019 · A.M. Khanwilkar; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court held that a Lok Adalat award mandating demolition of an unauthorized structure does not bar lawful reconstruction with permission, and disputes over nuisance must be addressed through appropriate legal remedies.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Lok Adalat award demolition unauthorized building Kerala Panchayath Building Rules, 2011

Reliance Life Insurance Co Ltd & Anr v. Rekhaben Nareshbhai Rathod

24 Apr 2019 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that non-disclosure of a prior life insurance policy in the proposal form justifies repudiation of the claim within two years under Section 45 of the Insurance Act, affirming the insurer's right to avoid the contract for breach of utmost good faith.

civil appeal_allowed Significant life insurance non-disclosure proposal form Section 45 Insurance Act 1938

Reliance Life Insurance Co Ltd & Anr v. Rekhaben Nareshbhai Rathod

24 Apr 2019 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that non-disclosure of a prior life insurance policy in the proposal form within two years of policy commencement justifies repudiation of the claim without proving materiality, allowing the insurer's appeal and dismissing the consumer complaint.

civil appeal_allowed Significant life insurance non-disclosure proposal form Section 45 Insurance Act 1938