Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

Randhir Kaur v. Balwinder Kaur

06 May 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court held that an unauthorized exchange of gifted school property was illegal, set aside the mutation in favor of the Principal and his heirs, and restored ownership to the educational institution.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Gift Deed Mutation Exchange of property Locus standi

Rambir v. State of NCT, Delhi

06 May 2019 · R. Banumathi; R. Subhash Reddy · 2019 INSC 626
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court modified a murder conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, reducing the sentence from life imprisonment to 10 years' imprisonment in a case of death caused in a sudden fight.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC culpable homicide not amounting to murder strangulation

Rambir v. State of NCT, Delhi

06 May 2019 · R. Banumathi; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court modified a murder conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, reducing the sentence from life imprisonment to 10 years' imprisonment, holding the killing occurred in a sudden fight without premeditation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC culpable homicide not amounting to murder sudden fight

Jiten K. Ajmera v. M/s Tejas Cooperative Housing Society

06 May 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and remitted the matter for admission of additional documents at the appellate stage under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC, emphasizing the need for reasoned orders and just adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XLI Rule 27 CPC additional evidence consumer dispute Occupancy Certificate

Jiten K. Ajmera v. M/s Tejas Cooperative Housing Society

06 May 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and remitted the matter for admission of additional evidence under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC, emphasizing the need for reasoned orders and timely disposal of consumer disputes.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XLI Rule 27 CPC additional evidence consumer dispute Occupancy Certificate

Raja Singh v. State of U.P.

06 May 2019 · R. Banumathi; R. Subhash Reddy · 2019 INSC 624

The Supreme Court held that officers appointed to the Minority Welfare Department prior to the 2001 Service Rules by selection are entitled to absorption and related benefits despite the Rules excluding such absorption.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant District Minority Welfare Officer Substantive appointment Deputation Service Rules 2001

Raja Singh v. State of U.P.

06 May 2019 · R. Banumathi; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court held that officers appointed prior to the 2001 Service Rules through selection are substantively appointed and entitled to absorption and benefits in the Minority Welfare Department, overruling the High Court's dismissal of their claims.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant substantive appointment deputation absorption Minority Welfare Department

Karnataka Housing Board v. K. A. Nagamani

06 May 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indu Malhotra
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that revision petitions under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 are not maintainable against orders passed by State Commissions in execution proceedings, as such proceedings are independent of the original consumer dispute.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Section 21(b) Revision Petition Execution Proceedings

Tejaswini Gaud v. Shekhar Jagdish Prasad Tewari

06 May 2019 · R. Banumathi; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court upheld the father's natural guardian right to custody of his minor child, affirming the High Court's habeas corpus order directing appellants to hand over custody in the child's welfare interest.

family appeal_dismissed Significant habeas corpus child custody natural guardian Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956

Tejaswini Gaud v. Shekhar Jagdish Prasad Tewari

06 May 2019 · R. Banumathi; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court upheld the father's natural guardianship and ordered custody of the minor child be handed over to him, affirming the writ of habeas corpus as a proper remedy in cases of illegal detention of a child.

family appeal_dismissed Significant child custody habeas corpus natural guardian Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956

Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecological Societies of India v. Union of India

03 May 2019 · Arun Mishra; Vineet Saran
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of penal provisions in the PC&PNDT Act treating clerical errors as offences, rejecting challenges that such provisions violate fundamental rights.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant PC&PNDT Act female foeticide sex determination clerical errors

Maharashtra Public Service Commission v. Sandeep Shriram Warade

03 May 2019 · Arun Mishra; Navin Sinha · 2019 INSC 622

The Supreme Court held that research experience in drug synthesis and testing is a desirable qualification but does not satisfy the essential manufacturing/testing experience required for appointment under recruitment advertisements, setting aside the High Court's contrary interpretation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant recruitment advertisement essential qualification desirable qualification research and development experience

Maharashtra Public Service Commission v. Sandeep Shriram Warade

03 May 2019 · Arun Mishra; Navin Sinha · 2019 (5) SCC 1

The Supreme Court held that research experience in drug development laboratories does not substitute essential manufacturing/testing experience required by recruitment advertisements and set aside the High Court's contrary interpretation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant recruitment advertisement essential qualification preference clause research and development experience

Shri Hanumant Dinkar Arjun v. Shri Suresh R. Andhare

03 May 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that a complaint based on adverse observations in a conviction order pending appeal cannot be entertained until the appeal is decided.

criminal appeal_dismissed sub judice criminal appeal complaint adverse observations

Bikkina Rama Rao & Ors. v. The Special Deputy Tahsildar

03 May 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and remanded the case for fresh consideration of the validity of sale deeds under the Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Areas Land Transfer Regulation, emphasizing proper application of the definition of 'Transfer' and consideration of all relevant evidence.

property appeal_allowed Significant Scheduled Areas Land Transfer Regulation Section 3(1)(a) Section 2(g) land transfer

Bikkina Rama Rao & Ors. v. The Special Deputy Tahsildar

03 May 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and remanded the case for fresh consideration of the validity of sale deeds under the Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Areas Land Transfer Regulation, emphasizing the need to examine all relevant provisions and documents.

property appeal_allowed Significant Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Areas Land Transfer Regulation, 1959 Section 3(1)(a) Section 2(g) land transfer

G. Rukmani Ganesan v. The Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Board

03 May 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; K. M. Joseph · 2019 INSC 623

The Supreme Court held that the Commissioner under the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 is not a Court for the purposes of the Limitation Act, and thus cannot condone delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act in appeals before him.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5 Limitation Act Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 Commissioner jurisdiction

G. Rukmani Ganesan v. The Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Board

03 May 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; K. M. Joseph

The Supreme Court held that the Commissioner under the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act is not a Court for Limitation Act purposes and cannot condone delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5 Limitation Act Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 Commissioner

Rajasthan State Roadways Transport Corporation v. Paramjeet Singh

03 May 2019 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that termination of a purely contractual appointment without notice is valid and does not violate natural justice when expressly permitted by the contract.

labor appeal_allowed Significant contractual appointment termination without notice natural justice principles of natural justice

The State of Jammu and Kashmir and Ors. v. Farid Ahmad Tak

02 May 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's quashing of compulsory retirement orders of government employees involved in corruption allegations, remitting the cases for fresh consideration under correct legal principles governing administrative action and judicial review.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant compulsory retirement Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services Regulations public interest judicial review