Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

The State of Jharkhand v. M/S Ajanta Bottlers & Blenders Pvt. Ltd.

02 Jul 2019 · A.M. Khanwilkar; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court upheld the State's levy on the final potable liquor produced using imported rectified spirit, holding it within the State's legislative competence and not a tax on non-potable industrial alcohol.

tax appeal_allowed Significant rectified spirit import fee potable liquor intoxicating liquor

M/S ADANI POWER (MUNDRA) LTD v. GUJARAT ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION

02 Jul 2019 · Arun Mishra; B. R. Gavai; Surya Kant · 2019 INSC 711

The Supreme Court held that the appellant was entitled to terminate the Power Purchase Agreement under contract terms upon non-fulfillment of fuel supply conditions, limiting liability to liquidated damages, and clarified the correct interpretation of termination clauses in power purchase contracts.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Power Purchase Agreement Termination Liquidated Damages Fuel Supply Agreement

M/S ADANI POWER (MUNDRA) LTD v. GUJARAT ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION

02 Jul 2019 · Arun Mishra; B. R. Gavai; Surya Kant
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that under the PPA, the appellant was entitled to terminate the agreement for non-fulfillment of fuel supply conditions without requiring mutual agreement, limiting liability to liquidated damages, and corrected the erroneous interpretation by the lower authorities.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Power Purchase Agreement Termination Liquidated Damages Fuel Supply Agreement

Dalbir Singh v. Union of India

02 Jul 2019 · M. R. Shah; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of a soldier for abandoning his post and exhibiting cowardice during an operation, while setting aside his imprisonment sentence.

military_criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Army Act Summary General Court Martial cowardice military discipline

Dalbir Singh v. Union of India

02 Jul 2019 · M. R. Shah; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court upheld dismissal of a soldier for cowardice in abandoning his post during a militant attack but set aside his imprisonment, emphasizing the duty of soldiers to perform assigned tasks under fire.

military_law appeal_dismissed Significant Army Act Summary General Court Martial cowardice abandoning post

Pharez John Abraham v. Arul Jothi Sivasubramaniam K.

02 Jul 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's decree granting share to heirs of a converted daughter, upheld the trial court's dismissal based on proven family settlement and limitation, and recognized adopted children’s equal inheritance rights under Christian law.

civil appeal_allowed Significant family settlement partition suit Christian succession adopted children inheritance

Pharez John Abraham v. Arul Jothi Sivasubramaniam K.

02 Jul 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court held that a family settlement must be proved by evidence, adopted children have inheritance rights under Christian law, and modified the High Court’s partition decree to grant equal shares to the defendants while dismissing the plaintiffs’ claim.

civil appeal_allowed Significant family settlement relinquishment partition suit Indian Succession Act

Sundar Gupta v. Sunil Vasudeva

02 Jul 2019 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court dismissed a contempt petition as infructuous following the decision in the related civil appeal, disposing of all pending applications.

civil petition_dismissed contempt petition infructuous civil appeal special leave petition

M/S CRAFT INTERIORS(P) LTD. v. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (INTELLIGENCE) & ANR.

02 Jul 2019 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Rule 6(4)(m)(i) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Rules, holding that deductions for goods used in the same form do not expand the charging section under Section 5B of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 Rule 6(4)(m)(i) works contract charging provision

M/S CRAFT INTERIORS(P) LTD. v. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (INTELLIGENCE) & ANR.

02 Jul 2019 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Rule 6(4)(m)(i) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Rules, 1957, holding that deductions for goods used in the same form do not expand the charging section and that transformed goods are separately taxable under Section 5B of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 Rule 6(4)(m)(i) works contract charging provision

Sunil Vasudeva v. Sundar Gupta

02 Jul 2019 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Ajay Rastogi
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s review order restoring a writ petition challenging an Income Tax Department auction sale of property, emphasizing the applicability of Section 293 Income Tax Act and principles of review jurisdiction.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant review petition Order 47 Rule 1 CPC Section 293 Income Tax Act auction sale

Arshnoor Singh v. Harpal Kaur

01 Jul 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indu Malhotra
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that property inherited before 1956 remains coparcenary property and sale deeds executed without legal necessity or consideration by a coparcener are void, allowing the appellant's appeal to set aside such sales.

civil appeal_allowed Significant coparcenary property Mitakshara law Hindu Succession Act, 1956 legal necessity

Madhav Prasad Aggarwal & Anr. v. Axis Bank Ltd. & Anr.

01 Jul 2019 · A.M. Khanwilkar; Ajay Rastogi
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC, a plaint cannot be rejected only against one defendant and set aside the High Court's partial rejection of the plaint against the bank, restoring the suit to proceed.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC Section 34 SARFAESI Act partial rejection of plaint maintainability of suit

Pradeep Ram v. State of Jharkhand & Anr

01 Jul 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; K. M. Joseph

The Supreme Court held that NIA's re-registration of FIR is not a second FIR, further investigation after charge sheet is permissible, and earlier bail does not automatically cover newly added offences requiring fresh bail or court permission for arrest.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail new offences re-registration of FIR second FIR

Pradeep Ram v. State of Jharkhand & Anr

01 Jul 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; K. M. Joseph

The Supreme Court held that re-registration of FIR by NIA under statutory powers is valid, further investigation after charge sheet is permissible, and earlier bail does not automatically extend to newly added offences requiring fresh bail application or court permission for arrest.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail re-registration of FIR National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967

VASAVI ENGINEERING COLLEGE PARENTS ASSOCIATION v. STATE OF TELANGANA

01 Jul 2019 · Arun Mishra; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court held that courts must exercise judicial restraint and cannot substitute their own view for the expert statutory committee's fee fixation unless there is arbitrariness or illegality, restoring the TAFRC's fee structure for Telangana unaided professional institutions.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant judicial review fee fixation educational institutions Telangana Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee

Parminder Singh v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

01 Jul 2019 · Indu Malhotra; M. R. Shah
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for a permanently disabled motor accident victim, held the insurer liable to pay initially despite invalid driver licenses, and emphasized just compensation considering actual income, disability, and attendant care.

civil appeal_allowed Significant permanent disability compensation loss of future earnings invalid driving license

Reckitt Benckiser (India) Private Limited v. Reynders Label Printing India Private Limited

01 Jul 2019 · A.M. Khanwilkar; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court held that a non-signatory group company cannot be bound by an arbitration agreement absent clear assent, dismissing the petition against respondent No.2 but appointing an arbitrator for domestic arbitration between petitioner and respondent No.1.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement non-signatory group of companies doctrine assent to arbitration

Reckitt Benckiser (India) Private Limited v. Reynders Label Printing India Private Limited

01 Jul 2019 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court held that a non-signatory company cannot be bound by an arbitration agreement absent clear evidence of intention to be bound, dismissing the petition against respondent No.2 and appointing an arbitrator for domestic arbitration between the petitioner and respondent No.1.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement non-signatory group of companies doctrine intention to be bound

Srilekha Sentilkumar v. Deputy Superintendent of Police, CBI

01 Jul 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari · 2019 INSC 703

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the dismissal of the discharge application under Section 239 Cr.P.C., holding that disputed issues must be tried on merits after evidence is adduced.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 239 Cr.P.C. discharge application Prevention of Corruption Act trial on merits