Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

Ravinder Kaur Grewal v. Manjit Kaur

07 Aug 2019 · Arun Mishra; S. Abdul Nazeer; M.R. Shah

The Supreme Court held that a person who has perfected title by adverse possession can maintain a suit under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for declaration of title and injunction to protect or recover possession, affirming that adverse possession can be used offensively by a plaintiff.

civil appeal_allowed Significant adverse possession Limitation Act, 1963 Article 65 declaration of title

Ravinder Kaur Grewal v. Manjit Kaur

07 Aug 2019 · Arun Mishra; S. Abdul Nazeer; M.R. Shah

The Supreme Court held that a perfected adverse possessor can maintain a suit for declaration of title and injunction under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963, using adverse possession as a cause of action, not merely as a defense.

civil appeal_allowed Significant adverse possession Limitation Act, 1963 Article 65 declaration of title

National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd v. BSCPL Infrastructure Ltd

07 Aug 2019 · R. F. Nariman; Surya Kant

The Supreme Court held that acceptance of a Letter of Award does not constitute a binding contract activating arbitration clauses in draft agreements, and disputes at the LOA stage fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of courts as per the bidding process.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Letter of Award Arbitration clause Bidding process Contract formation

The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Mohar Singh

07 Aug 2019 · R. Banumathi; A. S. Bopanna · 2019 INSC 870

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's reduction of a murder conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder, affirming the sentence already served by the accused.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part-I IPC culpable homicide murder

Dr. Sridip Chatterjee v. Dr. Gopa Chakraborty

06 Aug 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that expert committees’ finding of equivalence of a diploma to the prescribed qualification in a university appointment must be respected, reinstating the appellant whose appointment was set aside for alleged non-fulfillment of eligibility criteria.

civil appeal_allowed Significant equivalence of qualifications academic appointments judicial review selection committee

Balwan Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh; Latel Ram v. State of Chhattisgarh

06 Aug 2019 · N. V. Ramana; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; Ajay Rastogi · 2019 INSC 862

The Supreme Court overturned convictions for murder due to unreliable eye witness testimony, inconclusive forensic evidence, and failure to prove conspiracy, emphasizing the need for credible prosecution evidence beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant eye witness credibility delay in recording statement bloodstained weapon recovery Section 302 IPC

Balwan Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh

06 Aug 2019 · N. V. Ramana; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court overturned murder convictions due to unreliable eye witness testimony, inconclusive forensic evidence, and failure to prove conspiracy, emphasizing the prosecution's burden to prove charges beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant eye witness credibility delay in recording statement bloodstained weapon recovery forensic evidence

Dev Karan @ Lambu v. State of Haryana

06 Aug 2019 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; K. M. Joseph · 2019 INSC 865

The Supreme Court upheld convictions under Section 149 IPC for murder by an unlawful assembly despite non-framing of Section 141 charges, affirming vicarious liability based on common object and credible eyewitness testimony.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant unlawful assembly Section 149 IPC vicarious liability common object

Dev Karan @ Lambu v. State of Haryana

06 Aug 2019 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; K. M. Joseph

The Supreme Court upheld life convictions of accused for murder under Section 149 IPC, ruling that specific framing under Section 141 IPC is not mandatory if the unlawful assembly's ingredients are proved.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant unlawful assembly Section 149 IPC vicarious liability common object

The Superintendent of Post Offices & Ors v. Hanuman Giri

06 Aug 2019 · R. Banumathi; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that promotion entitlement must be based on the common merit list for relevant vacancies and set aside CAT and High Court orders promoting a candidate whose rank was insufficient in that list.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant promotion merit list Central Administrative Tribunal vacancies

The Superintendent of Post Offices & Ors v. Hanuman Giri

06 Aug 2019 · R. Banumathi; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that promotion must be based on the correct common merit list and vacancy rules, setting aside CAT and High Court orders that wrongly granted promotion to a candidate not entitled under the applicable merit and vacancy criteria.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Central Administrative Tribunal promotion merit list vacancy

Chandigarh Administration v. Hari Ram

06 Aug 2019 · R. Banumathi; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, directing the respondent to pay a fair market value for the leased commercial booth within six months, reinstating lease cancellation and eviction proceedings due to persistent payment default.

property appeal_allowed Significant lease cancellation eviction Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 doctrine of proportionality

Jagdish and Another v. State of Haryana

06 Aug 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; Navin Sinha
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants convicted of murder under Sections 302 and 149 IPC due to unreliable solitary eye witness testimony and lack of proof of common intention.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant solitary eye witness Section 302 IPC Section 149 IPC common intention

ANAND RAMACHANDRA CHOUGULE v. SIDARAI LAXMAN CHOUGALA

06 Aug 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court upheld the reduction of murder conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder due to lack of proof of premeditation and prosecution's suppression of material evidence, dismissing the appeals.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant premeditation Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part I IPC self-defense

ANAND RAMACHANDRA CHOUGULE v. SIDARAI LAXMAN CHOUGALA

06 Aug 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's reduction of murder convictions to culpable homicide not amounting to murder due to lack of premeditation and prosecution's suppression of material evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant premeditated murder culpable homicide not amounting to murder Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part I IPC

Kathi David Raju v. The State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr.

05 Aug 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court held that DNA testing cannot be ordered prematurely without sufficient material and investigation, quashing the order permitting such tests in a false caste certificate case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant DNA test Section 482 Cr.P.C. Section 53 Cr.P.C. false caste certificate

Vinod Kumar v. Ashok Kumar Gandhi

05 Aug 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; K. M. Joseph · 2019 INSC 860

The Supreme Court upheld the extension of landlord's bona fide eviction rights under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act to non-residential premises, affirming the correctness of Satyawati Sharma and dismissing challenges to its validity.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) bona fide need non-residential premises

Vinod Kumar v. Ashok Kumar Gandhi

05 Aug 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; K. M. Joseph

The Supreme Court upheld the extension of landlords' right to evict tenants on bona fide need grounds to non-residential premises under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, affirming the correctness of Satyawati Sharma and rejecting its referral to a larger Bench.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) Section 25B bona fide need

Jaipur Municipal Corporation v. Thakur Shiv Raj Singh

05 Aug 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court held that conversion charges under amended Section 173-A are payable for change of land use as per the Master Plan, set aside the refund order, and allowed the appeal of Jaipur Municipal Corporation.

property appeal_allowed Significant conversion charges Section 173-A Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959 land use

The Mayor Jaipur Municipal Corporation v. Thakur Shiv Raj Singh

05 Aug 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court held that under amended Section 173-A of the Rajasthan Municipalities Act, payment of conversion charges for change of land use as per the Master Plan is mandatory and set aside the High Court's order directing refund, granting liberty to respondents to clarify land use classification.

civil appeal_allowed Significant conversion charges Section 173-A Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959 land use