Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

Commissioner of Municipal Administration & Anr. v. M.C. Sheela Evanjalin & Ors.

22 Aug 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gupta
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that appointment to the post of Town Planning Inspector must comply with recruitment rules and set aside the High Court's order directing appointment of a non-feeder cadre candidate based solely on qualifications.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant appointment recruitment rules feeder cadre Town Planning Inspector

COMMISSIONER OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & ANR v. M.C. SHEELA EVANJALIN & ORS

22 Aug 2019 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; HEMANT GUPTA
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that appointment to public posts must follow prescribed recruitment rules and set aside the High Court's direction to appoint a non-feeder cadre employee as Town Planning Inspector.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant public employment recruitment rules feeder cadre appointment

Chintambaramma & Anr v. State of Karnataka

22 Aug 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants of murder charges due to failure of prosecution to prove conspiracy or direct involvement, emphasizing the necessity of a complete chain of circumstantial evidence and proper charge framing.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence Section 302 IPC conspiracy charge framing

Sudru v. The State of Chattisgarh

22 Aug 2019 · Deepak Gupta; B. R. Gavai

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC based on circumstantial evidence, credible hostile witness testimony, and failure to discharge the burden under Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence hostile witness Section 302 IPC Section 106 Indian Evidence Act

Sudru v. State of Chattisgarh

22 Aug 2019 · Deepak Gupta; B. R. Gavai

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for murder based on circumstantial evidence and the accused's failure to satisfactorily explain the death, affirming that credible parts of hostile witness testimony can sustain conviction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence hostile witness Section 106 Indian Evidence Act murder

Union of India v. BGP Products Operations GmbH & Hagene Immermatt Weg

22 Aug 2019 · Indu Malhotra; Abhay Manohar Sapre · 2019 INSC 947
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court admitted appeals challenging the validity of a government notification restricting domestic manufacture of the essential drug Oxytocin to public sector companies, referring key constitutional and statutory questions to a larger bench for authoritative decision.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Section 26A Drugs and Cosmetics Act Oxytocin manufacture restriction Essential Medicines National List of Essential Medicines

Union of India v. BGP Products Operations GmbH & Hagene Immermatt Weg

22 Aug 2019 · Indu Malhotra; Abhay Manohar Sapre
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court referred to a larger bench the question of constitutional validity and scope of Central Government's power under Section 26A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act to restrict manufacture of essential drug Oxytocin exclusively to public sector companies.

administrative other Significant Section 26A Drugs and Cosmetics Act Oxytocin manufacture restriction Essential Medicines National List of Essential Medicines

Ganga Vishan Gujrati v. State of Rajasthan

21 Aug 2019 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court held that promotions through limited departmental competitive examinations do not entitle candidates to retrospective seniority from the year of vacancy, affirming seniority from the date of substantive appointment.

service_law appeal_dismissed Significant seniority promotion departmental competitive examination retrospective seniority

Durgabai Deshmukh Memorial Sr. Sec. School v. J.A.J Vasu Sena

21 Aug 2019 · Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court held that under Rule 105 of the Delhi School Education Rules 1973, the maximum probation period is two years and confirmation requires an express order; mere continuation beyond probation does not amount to deemed confirmation.

labor appeal_allowed Significant probation period deemed confirmation Rule 105 Delhi School Education Rules 1973 extension of probation

M/S SHREE DANESHWARI TRADERS v. SANJAY JAIN AND ANOTHER

21 Aug 2019 · R. Banumathi; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court set aside the acquittal and convicted the respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that the statutory presumption under Section 139 was not rebutted by the respondent's evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 139 Negotiable Instruments Act statutory presumption dishonour of cheque

Rameshwar and Another v. State of Madhya Pradesh

21 Aug 2019 · R. Banumathi; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court affirmed the life conviction of appellant Balaram under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC, holding that common intention suffices to sustain conviction despite contradictions in witness statements.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC common intention life imprisonment

Union of India v. Nisar Pallathukadavil Aliyar

21 Aug 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; R. Subhash Reddy · 2019 INSC 941

The Supreme Court held that the Advisory Board's opinion under the COFEPOSA Act that there is no sufficient cause for detention is binding and not subject to judicial challenge, dismissing the petition and directing release of the detenu.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant COFEPOSA Act Advisory Board preventive detention Article 22 of Constitution

Union of India v. Nisar Pallathukadavil Aliyar

21 Aug 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court held that the Advisory Board's opinion under the COFEPOSA Act is advisory, not judicial, and not subject to judicial challenge, dismissing petitions against its opinion and directing release of detenus.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant COFEPOSA Act Advisory Board preventive detention Article 22 of Constitution

DR.P.S. MALIK v. HIGH COURT OF DELHI

21 Aug 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; Navin Sinha · 2019 INSC 936

The Supreme Court held that the Delhi High Court has exclusive disciplinary jurisdiction over subordinate judicial officers under Article 235, and the sexual harassment inquiry and suspension of the petitioner were lawful and within jurisdiction.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 235 Constitution disciplinary control sexual harassment Internal Complaints Committee

DR.P.S. MALIK v. HIGH COURT OF DELHI

21 Aug 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court held that the Delhi High Court has exclusive disciplinary jurisdiction over subordinate judicial officers under Article 235, and the sexual harassment inquiry and suspension of the petitioner were lawful, dismissing the writ petition.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 235 Constitution disciplinary control sexual harassment Internal Complaints Committee

West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. & Ors. v. M/s. Orion Metal Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

21 Aug 2019 · R. Banumathi; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court held that provisional and final assessment under Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003 can be made independently of criminal proceedings under Section 135 for theft of electricity, allowing parallel civil and criminal actions.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Electricity Act 2003 Section 126 Section 135 unauthorized use of electricity

West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. & Ors. v. M/s. Orion Metal Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

21 Aug 2019 · R. Banumathi; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court held that assessment under Section 126(1) of the Electricity Act, 2003 for unauthorized use of electricity, including theft, can proceed concurrently with criminal prosecution under Section 135 and is not limited to cases seeking restoration of supply.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Electricity Act 2003 Section 126 Section 135 unauthorized use of electricity

Jayantibhai Raojibhai Patel v. Municipal Council, Narkhed

21 Aug 2019 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court held that illegal termination warrants reinstatement with back wages as a norm, directing lump sum compensation for the appellant due to impracticability of reinstatement after retirement.

labor appeal_allowed Significant back wages illegal termination disciplinary inquiry reinstatement

Ravinder Kaur v. Manjeet Singh

21 Aug 2019 · R. Banumathi; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court restored the trial court's dismissal of a divorce petition, holding that mental cruelty requires substantial proof and irretrievable breakdown is not a statutory ground for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act.

family appeal_allowed Significant mental cruelty Hindu Marriage Act divorce irretrievable breakdown

Ravinder Kaur v. Manjeet Singh

21 Aug 2019 · R. Banumathi; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court restored the trial court's dismissal of a divorce petition on mental cruelty grounds, holding that irretrievable breakdown is not a statutory ground and legal actions to protect rights do not constitute cruelty.

family appeal_allowed Significant mental cruelty Hindu Marriage Act divorce irretrievable breakdown