Supreme Court of India

16,356 judgments

Year:

Kantaru Rajeevaru v. Indian Young Lawyers Association

14 Nov 2019 · Ranjan Gogoi; R. F. Nariman; D. Y. Chandrachud

The Supreme Court upheld the right of women aged 10 to 50 to enter the Sabarimala temple, holding that exclusionary practices violate their fundamental right to freedom of religion and equality under the Constitution.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Article 25 freedom of religion essential religious practice gender discrimination

Union of India v. Pradeep Vinod Construction

14 Nov 2019 · R. Banumathi; A.S. Bopanna; Hrishikesh Roy
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that arbitrator appointments must follow the contractually agreed procedure under Clause 64 of the GCC and set aside High Court appointments of independent arbitrators, directing Railways to appoint arbitrators as per the contract.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Clause 64 General Conditions of Contract Appointment of arbitrator Excepted matters

Union of India v. Pradeep Vinod Construction

14 Nov 2019 · R. Banumathi; A.S. Bopanna; Hrishikesh Roy
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that arbitrator appointments must follow contractually agreed procedures and set aside High Court appointments of independent arbitrators ignoring Clause 64 of the Railway contract.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration appointment Clause 64 GCC Railways contract Section 11 Arbitration Act

Rameshchandra Daulal Soni & Anr. v. Devichand Hiralal Gandhi

14 Nov 2019 · R. Banumathi; A.S. Bopanna; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court upheld eviction of statutory tenants under the Bombay Rent Act, rejecting claims of tenancy by non-participating legal heirs and affirming Civil Court jurisdiction over the suit property not established as agricultural land under the MTAL Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant statutory tenancy Bombay Rent Act Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act landlord-tenant relationship

Ram Krishan Grover v. Union of India

14 Nov 2019 · Ranjan Gogoi; L. Nageswara Rao; Sanjiv Khanna · 2019 INSC 1239

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act and its extension to Chandigarh, affirming the executive's power to extend amendments under Section 87 of the Punjab Reorganisation Act and validating preferential eviction rights for Non-Resident Indian landlords with procedural safeguards for tenants.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 13-B East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act Punjab Reorganisation Act Section 87 Non-Resident Indian landlord eviction Constitutional validity

Ram Krishan Grover v. Union of India

14 Nov 2019 · Ranjan Gogoi; L. Nageswara Rao; Sanjiv Khanna

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 13-B of the Rent Act and its extension to Chandigarh, rejecting challenges on excessive delegation, legislative competence, and arbitrariness under Article 14.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Section 13-B East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act Punjab Reorganisation Act Section 87 Non-Resident Indian landlord rights excessive delegation

The Manager, The Maharashtra State Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. Farmer Bank Employees Cooperative Housing Society Ltd.

14 Nov 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court held that a cooperative bank is not liable for deficiency in service for delay in transferring lease deeds to employee society absent negligence, and directed compensation or transfer of tenements excluding vacant plots, with stamp duty borne by the society.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Cooperative bank Lease deed transfer Deficiency in service

Manju Puri v. Rajiv Singh Hanspal

14 Nov 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; Navin Sinha · 2019 INSC 1244

The Supreme Court held that probate granted without issuing citation to disinherited legal heirs and on the basis of alleged forged consent is liable to be revoked, and the discretion to issue citation must be exercised judicially with proper care.

civil appeal_allowed Significant probate revocation of probate Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 263

Manju Puri v. Rajiv Singh Hanspal

14 Nov 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court held that probate granted without issuing citation to disinherited legal heirs and on allegedly forged no objection certificates is liable to be revoked, and discretion to issue citation must be exercised judicially.

civil appeal_allowed Significant probate revocation of probate Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 263

State of Tamil Nadu v. State of Karnataka and Another

14 Nov 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Vineet Saran
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court dismissed Tamil Nadu's interim application against Karnataka's water projects on the Pennaiyar river, emphasizing the need to invoke the Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956 procedure before court adjudication.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956 Article 131 Constitution Article 262 Constitution Pennaiyar river dispute

Commissioner of Central Excise, Haldia v. M/s. Krishna Wax (P) Ltd.

14 Nov 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Vineet Saran

The Supreme Court held that a preliminary internal order is not appealable and directed that excise proceedings initiated by a show cause notice be carried to their logical conclusion.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Central Excise Act, 1944 Section 11A show cause notice manufacture

Taj Mahal Hotel v. United India Insurance Company Ltd.

14 Nov 2019 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court held that a hotel is prima facie liable for theft of a guest's vehicle under a bailment relationship and cannot exclude liability for negligence by a general disclaimer, while recognizing insurer's locus standi as subrogee.

civil appeal_allowed Significant bailment hotel liability valet parking subrogation

Taj Mahal Hotel v. United India Insurance Company Ltd.

14 Nov 2019 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court held that a hotel is liable under bailment law for theft of a guest’s vehicle during valet parking unless it proves reasonable care was taken, and an insurer as subrogee has locus standi to file a consumer complaint.

civil appeal_allowed Significant locus standi subrogation bailment hotel liability

WAPCOS Ltd v. Salma Dam Joint Venture

14 Nov 2019 · A.M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that a subsequent amendment agreement expressly barring arbitration extinguished the original arbitration clause, rendering the arbitration petition invalid and dismissing the appeal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration Agreement Amendment of Agreement Accord and Satisfaction Joint Venture Authority

WAPCOS Ltd v. Salma Dam Joint Venture

14 Nov 2019 · A.M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that a subsequent amendment agreement barring arbitration extinguished the original arbitration clause, and a revoked joint venture partner lacked authority to invoke arbitration, leading to dismissal of the arbitration petition.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration Agreement Amendment of Agreement Power of Attorney Joint Venture

Yashwant Sinha v. Central Bureau of Investigation

14 Nov 2019 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; K. M. Joseph · 2019 INSC 1242
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court dismissed review petitions challenging the Rafale fighter jet procurement, affirming limited judicial review in defence contracts and denying directions for FIR registration, while correcting a factual error and closing a contempt petition against Rahul Gandhi with caution.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant judicial review defence procurement Rafale deal review petition

Yashwant Sinha v. Central Bureau of Investigation

14 Nov 2019 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; K. M. Joseph
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court dismissed review petitions challenging the Rafale fighter jet deal, affirming limited judicial review in defence procurement and denying FIR registration absent prima facie offence.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant judicial review defence procurement Rafale deal review jurisdiction

THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR. v. DICITEX FURNISHING LTD.

13 Nov 2019 · Arun Mishra; S. Ravindra Bhat
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a discharge voucher signed under economic duress does not bar arbitration and upheld the appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant discharge voucher economic duress arbitration accord and satisfaction

THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR. v. DICITEX FURNISHING LTD.

13 Nov 2019 · Arun Mishra; S. Ravindra Bhat
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a discharge voucher signed under economic duress does not bar arbitration, and a prima facie genuine plea of coercion requires appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant discharge voucher economic duress arbitration accord and satisfaction

Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India v. Subhash Chandra Agarwal

13 Nov 2019 · Sanjiv Khanna; Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud

The Supreme Court held that the office of the Chief Justice of India and the Supreme Court constitute a single public authority under the RTI Act, and that information relating to judicial appointments and asset declarations by judges is subject to disclosure unless exempted under the Act, balancing transparency with judicial independence.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Right to Information Act, 2005 judicial independence Chief Justice of India public authority