Supreme Court of India

16,356 judgments

Year:

Vurimi Pullarao v. Vemari Vyankata Radharani

27 Nov 2019 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Ajay Rastogi
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a subsequent suit for specific performance is barred under Order 2 Rule 2 CPC if relief was omitted in an earlier suit without leave, where the cause of action is identical and pleadings of the earlier suit are on record.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order 2 Rule 2 CPC bar of subsequent suit specific performance cause of action

CENTURY RAYON LIMITED v. IVP LIMITED

27 Nov 2019 · N. V. Ramana; Sanjiv Khanna; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against an interim injunction restraining erection of electricity transmission towers on private land, holding that lawful permissions and compensation provisions under the Telegraph Act and Electricity Act permit such construction in the public interest.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Telegraph Act, 1885 Electricity Act, 2003 electricity transmission lines interim injunction

CENTURY RAYON LIMITED v. IVP LIMITED

27 Nov 2019 · N. V. Ramana; Sanjiv Khanna; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal setting aside the interim injunction against erection of electricity transmission towers on private land, emphasizing statutory powers under the Telegraph and Electricity Acts and public interest, subject to ad hoc compensation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Telegraph Act, 1885 Electricity Act, 2003 electricity transmission line interim injunction

Vinod Kumar Garg v. State (Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi)

27 Nov 2019 · Indu Malhotra; Sanjiv Khanna
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, ruling that minor contradictions and procedural irregularities do not vitiate a well-established case of bribery supported by statutory presumption and corroborative evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7 Section 13 Section 20

Shiv Sena and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

26 Nov 2019 · N. V. Ramana; Ashok Bhushan; Sanjiv Khanna
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court directed an immediate floor test to ascertain majority support of the Maharashtra Chief Minister appointed by the Governor, emphasizing constitutional morality and democratic values.

constitutional other Significant Governor's discretion floor test Article 356 President's Rule

Perkins Eastman Architects DPC & Anr. v. HSCC (India) Ltd.

26 Nov 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court held that a party official with a direct interest cannot validly appoint a sole arbitrator, and the Court may appoint an independent arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act to ensure impartiality in international commercial arbitration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) International Commercial Arbitration Appointment of Arbitrator

Perkins Eastman Architects DPC & Anr. v. HSCC (India) Ltd.

26 Nov 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court held that where a party with interest in the dispute fails or is disqualified to appoint a sole arbitrator as per contract, the Court may annul such appointment and itself appoint an independent arbitrator in an international commercial arbitration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) International Commercial Arbitration Appointment of Arbitrator

Karnataka State Pollution Control Board v. B. Heera Naik & Ors.

26 Nov 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; M. R. Shah · 2019 INSC 1283

The Supreme Court held that Municipal Commissioners and Chief Officers of City Municipal Councils, being officers of bodies corporate and not Government Departments, can be prosecuted under Section 47 of the Water Act, 1974, and quashing of prosecution under Section 48 was erroneous.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 Section 48 Section 47 Municipal Council

Karnataka State Pollution Control Board v. B. Heera Naik & Ors.

26 Nov 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court held that Municipal Commissioners and Chief Officers of City Municipal Councils can be prosecuted under the Water Act, 1974 as offences by bodies corporate under Section 47, and not under Section 48 applicable to Government Departments.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 Section 48 Municipal Council Municipal Commissioner

V. Rajaram v. State

26 Nov 2019 · R. Banumathi; A. S. Bopanna · 2019 INSC 1282

The Supreme Court acquitted a Deputy Superintendent of Police charged under Sections 217 and 221 IPC, holding that mere presence and failure to prevent crime without intentional disobedience or omission is insufficient for conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 217 IPC Section 221 IPC disobedience of lawful orders omission to apprehend offenders

V. Rajaram v. State

26 Nov 2019 · R. Banumathi; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court acquitted a Deputy Superintendent of Police charged under Sections 217 and 221 IPC, holding that mere presence and subordinate role without intentional disobedience or omission is insufficient for conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 217 IPC Section 221 IPC public servant disobedience omission to apprehend

Gurjit Singh v. State of Punjab

26 Nov 2019 · Navin Sinha; B. R. Gavai

The Supreme Court upheld conviction under Section 498-A IPC but set aside the conviction under Section 306 IPC for abetment of suicide due to lack of evidence establishing instigation or proximate nexus between cruelty and suicide.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 498-A IPC Section 306 IPC Section 304-B IPC abetment of suicide

Nasima Naqi v. Todi Tea Company Ltd

26 Nov 2019 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Ajay Rastogi · 2019 INSC 1284

The Supreme Court held that under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997, the spouse of a deceased tenant has no lifetime protection from eviction or right to a fresh tenancy agreement for non-residential premises, affirming eviction decrees and noting the legislative omission requires amendment.

property appeal_dismissed Significant West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 Section 2(g) tenant spouse

Nasima Naqi v. Todi Tea Company Ltd

26 Nov 2019 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court held that under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997, the spouse of a deceased tenant has no lifetime protection or right to a fresh tenancy agreement for non-residential premises, affirming eviction and recognizing the legislative omission as a matter for amendment.

property appeal_dismissed Significant West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 Section 2(g) tenant spouse

Kaushaliya v. Jodha Ram

25 Nov 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court held that a mediated settlement incorporated into its order is binding and enforceable against parties and third parties without title, directing compliance and possession handover in a family property dispute.

civil appeal_allowed Significant settlement agreement mediation Supreme Court order Agreement to Sell

Kaushaliya v. Jodha Ram & Ors.

25 Nov 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court held that a mediation settlement incorporated into its order is binding and enforceable against parties and third parties without title, directing compliance and possession handover accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant settlement agreement mediation Supreme Court order Agreement to Sell

Kapilaben & Ors. v. Ashok Kumar Jayantilal Sheth Through POA Gopalbhai Madhusudan Patel & Ors.

25 Nov 2019 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court held that without the original party's consent, assignment of contractual obligations is invalid, and Respondent Nos. 1 cannot seek specific performance of agreements assigned without such consent.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance assignment of contract representative-in-interest Section 15(b) Specific Relief Act

Genpact India Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.

22 Nov 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indira Banerjee · 2019 INSC 1277
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that appeals lie against tax demands under Section 115QA of the Income Tax Act and upheld the High Court's refusal to entertain a writ petition due to availability of an alternate remedy.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 115QA Income Tax Act, 1961 buy-back of shares appealability

Genpact India Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.

22 Nov 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indira Banerjee
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that an appeal is maintainable against tax demands under Section 115QA of the Income Tax Act and upheld the High Court's refusal to entertain a writ petition due to availability of an alternate remedy.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 115QA Income Tax Act, 1961 buy-back of shares appealability

W. N. Allal Sundaram v. The Commissioner H.R. & C.E. Admn. Department

22 Nov 2019 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court upheld that a trust created by a 1926 Deed of Settlement for constructing a choultry for temple devotees constitutes a specific endowment under the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959, dismissing the appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific endowment Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 religious charity public trust