Supreme Court of India

16,356 judgments

Year:

State of Telangana v. Sri Managipet Sarveshwar Reddy

06 Dec 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that a re-employed officer validly authorized investigations under the Prevention of Corruption Act, the informant can be the investigating officer, and preliminary inquiry is not mandatory before FIR registration in all corruption cases, thereby setting aside the High Court's quashing of proceedings.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 17 PCA de facto doctrine preliminary inquiry

Rajesh Kumar Dwivedi v. State of U.P. & Anr.

06 Dec 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gupta
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that the appellant's multiple trade certificates recognized by State Circulars are equivalent to the prescribed qualification for appointment as Instructor, allowing the appeal and directing his appointment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant equivalency of qualifications recruitment rules National Council of Vocational Training Government Circulars

BSES Yamuna Power Ltd. v. Ghanshyam Chand Sharma

05 Dec 2019 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court held that resignation results in forfeiture of past service and disqualifies an employee from pensionary benefits, overruling prior precedent that equated resignation with voluntary retirement for pension claims.

civil appeal_allowed Significant resignation voluntary retirement pensionary benefits forfeiture of service

BSES Yamuna Power Ltd. v. Ghanshyam Chand Sharma

05 Dec 2019 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court held that resignation results in forfeiture of past service and denial of pension benefits, rejecting retrospective reclassification of resignation as voluntary retirement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant resignation voluntary retirement pensionary benefits forfeiture of service

State of NCT of Delhi v. Shiv Charan Bansal

05 Dec 2019 · Indu Malhotra; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court held that sufficient material existed to frame charges against accused Shiv Charan Bansal, Lalit Mann, and Shailendra Singh for the murder of S.N. Gupta, setting aside their discharge and directing trial to proceed.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant framing of charges criminal conspiracy prima facie case Section 302 IPC

State of NCT of Delhi v. Shiv Charan Bansal

05 Dec 2019 · Indu Malhotra; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court held that sufficient material existed to frame charges against accused Shiv Charan Bansal, Lalit Mann, and Shailendra Singh for conspiracy and murder, setting aside their discharge and directing expeditious trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant framing of charges criminal conspiracy Section 227 CrPC Section 228 CrPC

Mahipal v. Rajesh Kumar

05 Dec 2019 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hrishikesh Roy · 2019 INSC 1325

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail order in a murder case for non-application of mind and emphasized the need for reasoned judicial orders when granting bail in serious offences.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 439 CrPC murder Section 302 IPC

Mahipal v. Rajesh Kumar

05 Dec 2019 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail order in a murder case, emphasizing the necessity of reasoned judicial orders and proper application of mind in bail proceedings under Section 439 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 439 CrPC Section 302 IPC prima facie case

Station House Officer, CBI/ACB/Bangalore v. B.A. Srinivasan

05 Dec 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indu Malhotra; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that sanction under the Prevention of Corruption Act is not required for prosecuting a retired public servant and that protection under Section 197 CrPC applies only if offences are committed in discharge of official duty, thereby restoring charges against the accused and setting aside his discharge.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant sanction under Prevention of Corruption Act Section 197 CrPC public servant prosecution retired public servant

M/S BHUWALKA STEEL INDUSTRIES LTD & ANR v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

05 Dec 2019 · R.F. Nariman; Aniruddha Bose; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court remitted the challenge to the validity of Rule 5 of the 1997 Rules under the Central Excise Act to a Division Bench, holding that the referred question on Rule 96-ZP(3) did not arise on facts and was not disputed.

tax other Procedural Rule 5 of 1997 Rules Section 3-A Central Excise Act Article 14 Constitution of India ultra vires

Harbhajan Singh v. State of Punjab

04 Dec 2019 · N. V. Ramana; Sanjiv Khanna; Krishna Murari · 2019 INSC 1315

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Punjab Religious Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1997, holding that tenants of religious institutions form a separate class and the Act's eviction provisions do not violate Article 14.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Religious Premises Act unauthorised occupation Article 14 classification

Harbhajan Singh v. State of Punjab

04 Dec 2019 · N. V. Ramana; Sanjiv Khanna; Krishna Murari
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Punjab Religious Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1997, affirming that tenants of religious institutions without valid leases are unauthorized occupants and not entitled to protection under general rent control laws.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Religious Premises Act Eviction Article 14 Tenancy

The Maharashtra State Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. Babulal Lade & Ors.

04 Dec 2019 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that employees' dues do not have statutory priority over secured creditors under SARFAESI Act but the secured creditor bank is contractually liable to pay employees' dues from sale proceeds of secured assets.

civil appeal_allowed Significant SARFAESI Act MRTU & PULP Act Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act employees' dues

P. Chidambaram v. Directorate of Enforcement

04 Dec 2019 · R. Banumathi; A.S. Bopanna; Hrishikesh Roy · 2019 INSC 1317

The Supreme Court granted regular bail to P. Chidambaram in a money laundering case, holding that while economic offences are grave, bail refusal must be based on concrete risk factors and not on merits or sealed materials at the bail stage.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant regular bail economic offences Prevention of Money Laundering Act FIPB approval

P. Chidambaram v. Directorate of Enforcement

04 Dec 2019 · R. Banumathi; A.S. Bopanna; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court allowed P. Chidambaram's appeal and granted him regular bail in a grave economic offence case, emphasizing that bail refusal is the exception and that findings on merits should not be made at bail stage.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant regular bail economic offences Prevention of Money Laundering Act triple test for bail

State of Odisha v. Manju Naik

04 Dec 2019 · R. Banumathi; A. S. Bopanna; Hrishikesh Roy
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a government employee must fulfill the ten-year qualifying service requirement under the Pension Rules to be eligible for invalid pension, and set aside orders granting such pension to a deceased employee with insufficient service.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant invalid pension qualifying service Orissa Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1992 service gratuity

The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd. v. State of Karnataka

04 Dec 2019 · Arun Mishra; M.R. Shah; B.R. Gavai

The Supreme Court held that a time charter agreement transferring the right to use a vessel constitutes a taxable sale under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, and the State has jurisdiction to levy sales tax despite the vessel operating in territorial waters.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant transfer of right to use sales tax time charter agreement territorial waters

THE GREAT EASTERN SHIPPING CO. LTD. v. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

04 Dec 2019 · Arun Mishra; M.R. Shah; B.R. Gavai

The Supreme Court held that a Time Charter Agreement constitutes transfer of right to use goods attracting sales tax, but the State of Karnataka lacks jurisdiction to levy sales tax on transactions in territorial waters, which fall under Union jurisdiction.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Time Charter Agreement Transfer of right to use goods Sales Tax Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957

Jagjeet Singh Lyallpuri Lrs. & Ors v. M/s Unitop Apartments & Builders Ltd.

03 Dec 2019 · R. Banumathi; A.S. Bopanna; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court held that an arbitration award cannot be set aside for lack of cross-examination when parties agreed to dispense with it, restoring the award and directing a settlement payment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 19 procedure Section 34 setting aside award Section 37 appeal

M/s Embassy Property Developments Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Karnataka & Ors.

03 Dec 2019 · Rohinton Fali Nariman; Aniruddha Bose; V. Ramasubramanian · 2019 INSC 1310

The Supreme Court held that NCLT lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate public law matters like mining lease extensions under MMDR Act, and High Court may intervene under Article 226 when NCLT acts without jurisdiction despite statutory appellate remedies under IBC.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 National Company Law Tribunal National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Article 226