Supreme Court of India

16,356 judgments

Year:

Prabhakar Tewari v. State of U.P.

24 Jan 2020 · Deepak Gupta; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's grant of bail to accused persons in a murder case, emphasizing limited appellate interference in bail orders absent non-application of mind or lack of prima facie evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail criminal conspiracy Section 302 IPC Section 161 CrPC

State of Kerala v. Rajesh

24 Jan 2020 · Indu Malhotra; Ajay Rastogi
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside High Court's grant of post-arrest bail under the NDPS Act for failure to comply with mandatory statutory conditions, emphasizing strict adherence to Section 37(1)(b)(ii).

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 37(1)(b)(ii) post-arrest bail reasonable grounds

State of Kerala v. Rajesh

24 Jan 2020 · Indu Malhotra; Ajay Rastogi
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside High Court bail orders in NDPS cases for non-compliance with mandatory Section 37 conditions, emphasizing strict adherence to bail restrictions in narcotics offences involving commercial quantities.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 37(1)(b)(ii) post-arrest bail commercial quantity

Gurshinder Singh v. Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd.

24 Jan 2020 · N. V. Ramana; R. Subhash Reddy; B. R. Gavai

The Supreme Court held that delay in informing the insurer about vehicle theft, when FIR is lodged immediately and claim verified genuine, cannot justify repudiation of the insurance claim.

civil appeal_allowed Significant insurance claim delay in intimation theft of vehicle immediate notice

Gurshinder Singh v. Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd.

24 Jan 2020 · N. V. Ramana; R. Subhash Reddy; B. R. Gavai

The Supreme Court held that delay in informing the insurer about vehicle theft does not disentitle the insured to claim if the theft was immediately reported to police and the claim verified genuine.

civil appeal_allowed Significant insurance claim delay in intimation theft of vehicle FIR

Sanjay Marutirao Patil v. Union of India

24 Jan 2020 · L. Nageswara Rao; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court held that dismissal under Section 20 of the Army Act after a Summary Court Martial punishment not confirmed by competent authority is valid and does not violate double jeopardy.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Army Act, 1950 Section 20 Summary Court Martial double jeopardy

The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India v. J.R. William Singh

24 Jan 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court held that an Electrician excluded by settlement terms from further time-bound promotions beyond the next grade is not entitled to promotion to Section Officer or Executive Officer under TBPS, overruling the High Court's contrary order.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Time-Bound Promotion Scheme Settlement Agreement Clause 1(v) President's Decision

H.P. Puttaswamy v. Thimmamma & Ors.

24 Jan 2020 · Deepak Gupta; Aniruddha Bose · 2020 INSC 86

The Supreme Court held that the purchaser's presence at registration is not mandatory under the Registration Act, validating an earlier sale deed and dismissing a subsequent conflicting claim.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Registration Act, 1908 presence of purchaser sale deed registration immovable property

H.P. Puttaswamy v. Thimmamma & Ors.

24 Jan 2020 · Deepak Gupta; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court held that the purchaser's presence at registration is not mandatory under the Registration Act, 1908, validating the earlier sale deed and dismissing the appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Registration Act 1908 presence of purchaser sale deed validity possession

Bajrang Lal Sharma v. C.K. Mathew

23 Jan 2020 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indira Banerjee; M.R. Shah
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court dismissed contempt petitions against the State of Rajasthan for issuing a notification on reservation in promotion for SC/ST, holding no willful contempt and clarifying that substantive challenges to reservation policies require proper adjudication.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant reservation in promotion Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes consequential seniority

M/S. GRANULES INDIA LTD v. UNION OF INDIA

23 Jan 2020 · Navin Sinha; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal holding that exemption from customs duty under a clarificatory notification applies to consignments imported under a valid advance licence despite import dates falling between withdrawal and reinstatement notifications.

tax appeal_allowed Significant customs duty exemption Advance Licence Scheme clarificatory notification Customs Act 1962

Star India (P) Ltd v. Society of Catalysts

23 Jan 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court set aside the finding of unfair trade practice against Star India and Airtel, holding that the complainant failed to prove that the contest prize money was funded by increased SMS charges and that the higher SMS tariff was justified as a value-added service.

consumer_protection appeal_allowed Significant unfair trade practice Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Section 2(1)(r)(3)(a) value-added service

Shraddhanand College v. Amar Nath Jha

23 Jan 2020 · R. Banumathi; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court upheld the Delhi High Court's order directing the University of Delhi to approve Dr. A.N. Jha's appointment as Vice-Principal, holding that procedural non-compliance cannot deny a duly appointed candidate's substantive rights.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Vice-Principal appointment University of Delhi Ordinance XVIII prior approval

The Home Secretary (Prison) & Ors v. H. Nilofer Nisha

23 Jan 2020 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Deepak Gupta

The Supreme Court held that habeas corpus does not lie for premature release of lawfully convicted life prisoners without completion of prescribed administrative procedures and reasoned orders, setting aside High Court release orders and directing reconsideration of representations.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant habeas corpus premature release life imprisonment executive discretion

THE HOME SECRETARY (PRISON) & ORS v. H. NILOFER NISHA

23 Jan 2020 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Deepak Gupta

The Supreme Court held that habeas corpus does not lie to order premature release of life convicts without the competent authority's decision under the government scheme, setting aside High Court orders and directing reconsideration of representations.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant habeas corpus premature release life imprisonment Article 226

Nawab v. State of Uttarakhand

22 Jan 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; Navin Sinha · 2020 INSC 78

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a husband for murdering his wife based on circumstantial evidence and failure to explain the homicidal death occurring in his presence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence Section 106 Evidence Act Section 302 IPC murder inside house

Nawab v. State of Uttarakhand

22 Jan 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a husband for the murder of his wife based on circumstantial evidence and the accused's failure to provide a plausible explanation under Section 106 of the Evidence Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence Section 302 IPC Section 106 Evidence Act Section 313 CrPC

Shyamlal Devda and Others v. Parimala

22 Jan 2020 · R. Banumathi; A. S. Bopanna; Hrishikesh Roy · 2020 INSC 77

The Supreme Court held that the Metropolitan Magistrate Court at Bengaluru has jurisdiction under Section 27 of the Domestic Violence Act to entertain complaints where the aggrieved resides, but quashed proceedings against distant relatives lacking specific allegations.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Domestic Violence Act 2005 Section 27 jurisdiction Metropolitan Magistrate Court Bengaluru Protection order

Shyamlal Devda and Others v. Parimala

22 Jan 2020 · R. Banumathi; A. S. Bopanna; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court held that the Metropolitan Magistrate Court at Bengaluru has jurisdiction under Section 27 of the Domestic Violence Act to entertain complaints where the aggrieved person resides, but quashed proceedings against distant relatives lacking specific allegations.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 27 jurisdiction Domestic violence Metropolitan Magistrate jurisdiction

Varadarajan v. Kanakavalli & Ors.

22 Jan 2020 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gupta
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that in execution proceedings, the legal representative determined by a summary inquiry under Order XXII Rule 5 CPC is entitled to execute the decree, and the High Court erred in setting aside the Executing Court's order without proper grounds.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXII Rule 5 CPC legal representative execution of decree Will validity