Supreme Court of India

16,356 judgments

Year:

Sangita Arya v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.

16 Jun 2020 · R. Banumathi; Indu Malhotra; Aniruddha Bose
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's erroneous reduction of compensation in a motor accident claim, restoring and enhancing the award based on valid income evidence and established legal principles.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation income assessment Income Tax Return

Savitha v. M/s. Chodamandalam M.S. General Insurance Co. Ltd.

16 Jun 2020 · R.F. Nariman; Navin Sinha; B.R. Gavai · 2020 INSC 430

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by accepting the full medical disability assessment and increasing awards for loss of amenities, while rejecting unsubstantiated income claims.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident compensation loss of income total body disability notional income

Savitha v. M/s. Chodamandalam M.S. General Insurance Co. Ltd.

16 Jun 2020 · R.F. Nariman; Navin Sinha; B.R. Gavai

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by accepting the medical expert's 32% disability assessment and increasing awards for loss of income and amenities.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident compensation disability assessment loss of income notional income

The Inspector General of Registration, Tamil Nadu & Ors. v. K. Baskaran

15 Jun 2020 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indu Malhotra · 2020 INSC 428

The Supreme Court held that delegation of ancillary tasks by the appellate authority under Section 47-A of the Indian Stamp Act is permissible, and the three-month time limit for passing final orders is directory, thereby setting aside the High Court's invalidation of valuation proceedings.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Section 47-A Indian Stamp Act delegation of powers Rule 11-A Tamil Nadu Stamp Rules market value determination

The Inspector General of Registration, Tamil Nadu & Ors. v. K. Baskaran

15 Jun 2020 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indu Malhotra
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that deputing subordinate officers for inspections under Section 47-A of the Indian Stamp Act does not amount to unlawful delegation, and the three-month time limit in the Rules is directory, thereby restoring the appellate authority’s orders enhancing stamp duty.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Section 47-A Indian Stamp Act delegation of powers Rule 11-A Tamil Nadu Stamp Rules market value determination

Warad Murti Mishra v. State of Madhya Pradesh

15 Jun 2020 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court directed a Larger Bench to reconsider the seniority and confirmation rights of Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Service probationers who failed to clear departmental examinations within the prescribed probation period, emphasizing the interplay of relevant service rules and prior precedents.

administrative other Significant probation departmental examination seniority confirmation

Vinodchandra Sakarlal Kapadia v. State of Gujarat

15 Jun 2020 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indu Malhotra; A.S. Bopanna · 2020 INSC 427

The Supreme Court held that Sections 43 and 63 of the Bombay Tenancy Act do not bar testamentary disposition of agricultural land to non-agriculturists, restricting only inter vivos transfers requiring prior sanction.

property appeal_allowed Significant Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 Section 43 Section 63 testamentary disposition

Vinodchandra Sakarlal Kapadia v. State of Gujarat

15 Jun 2020 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indu Malhotra; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that Sections 43 and 63 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act do not bar transfer of agricultural land to non-agriculturists by testamentary disposition (Will), restricting the term 'transfer' to inter vivos transactions requiring prior sanction.

property appeal_allowed Significant Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 Section 43 Section 63 testamentary disposition

M.H. Uma Maheshwari & Ors. v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.

12 Jun 2020 · N.V. Ramana; R. Subhash Reddy; Surya Kant · 2020 INSC 424

The Supreme Court restored the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's compensation award by holding that future prospects must be granted at 30% for a deceased aged 40-50 years and disallowed the High Court's reduction of compensation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 compensation future prospects

M.H. Uma Maheshwari & Ors. v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.

12 Jun 2020 · N.V. Ramana; R. Subhash Reddy; Surya Kant
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court restored the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's compensation award, holding that future prospects must be calculated at 30% for a deceased aged between 40 and 50 years, rejecting the High Court's reduction to 15%.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 compensation future prospects

Bikram Chatterji & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

10 Jun 2020 · Arun Mishra; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court granted NBCC immunity while completing Amrapali projects, upheld interest on diverted funds, rejected release of FAR to authorities, dismissed challenges to forensic audit findings, and directed banks to release home loans with reasonable interest on dues to authorities.

civil other Significant NBCC immunity Amrapali Group Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Forensic Audit

SRI ANTHONY alias ANTHONY SWAMY v. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, K.S.R.T.C.

10 Jun 2020 · R.F. Nariman; Navin Sinha; B.R. Gavai
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident case by properly assessing permanent disability and its impact on future earnings, medical expenses, and loss of amenities.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident compensation permanent disability loss of future earnings functional disability

U.P. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION v. RAJENDRI DEVI

08 Jun 2020 · R. F. Nariman; Navin Sinha; B. R. Gavai

The Supreme Court held that the insurance company is liable to pay compensation for a motor accident involving a bus operated under contract by a corporation, overruling earlier rulings that held the corporation solely liable.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act owner definition vicarious liability insurance company liability

Chandrakanta Tiwari v. New India Assurance Company Ltd. & Anr.

08 Jun 2020 · R. F. Nariman; Navin Sinha; B. R. Gavai · 2020 INSC 419

The Supreme Court held that under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, liability for compensation is no-fault, the multiplier must be based on the victim's age, and restored the MACT award with modification, allowing the claimant's appeal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 163A Motor Vehicles Act no-fault liability motor accident compensation multiplier for compensation

Chandrakanta Tiwari v. New India Assurance Company Ltd. & Anr.

08 Jun 2020 · R. F. Nariman; Navin Sinha; B. R. Gavai
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, no-fault liability applies and the claimant is entitled to compensation without proving negligence, correcting the multiplier and restoring the MACT award.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 163A Motor Vehicles Act no-fault liability motor accident compensation multiplier for compensation

Addissery Raghavan v. Cheruvalath Krishnadasan

08 Jun 2020 · R. F. Nariman; Navin Sinha; B. R. Gavai · 2020 INSC 418

The Supreme Court held that the High Court in revisional jurisdiction under the Kerala Rent Control Act cannot reappreciate evidence and set aside eviction findings unless perverse, restoring the Appellate Authority’s order denying eviction on bonafide requirement and comparative hardship grounds.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Kerala Rent Control Act Section 11(8) Section 20 revisional jurisdiction

Addissery Raghavan v. Cheruvalath Krishnadasan

08 Jun 2020 · R. F. Nariman; Navin Sinha; B. R. Gavai

The Supreme Court held that the High Court in revisional jurisdiction cannot reappreciate evidence or substitute findings of fact of the Rent Control Appellate Authority unless perverse, and restored the appellate authority's order denying eviction on landlord's bonafide requirement under Section 11(8) of the Kerala Rent Control Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Kerala Rent Control Act Section 11(8) Section 20 revisional jurisdiction

Ramnath & Co. v. Commissioner of Income Tax

05 Jun 2020 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that specialized services rendered from India to foreign enterprises, resulting in foreign exchange earnings, qualify for deduction under Section 80-O of the Income Tax Act, reversing the High Court's denial of such benefit.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 80-O Income Tax Act services rendered from India services rendered in India foreign exchange earnings

State of Orissa v. M/S B. Engineers & Builders Ltd.

05 Jun 2020 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Indira Banerjee; Dinesh Maheshwari · 2020 INSC 414

The Supreme Court upheld the contractor's right to reimbursement of sales tax paid on works contracts under contractual and statutory provisions, quashing the State's contrary Circular.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant works contract sales tax reimbursement Clause 45(2) GCC

State of Orissa v. M/S B. Engineers & Builders Ltd.

05 Jun 2020 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Indira Banerjee; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court upheld the contractor's right to reimbursement of sales tax paid on works contracts under contractual and statutory provisions, quashing the State Government's contrary circular.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant works contract sales tax reimbursement Clause 45 of GCC