High Court of Bombay

4,240 judgments

Year:

Abhimanyu Narasu Patil v. Commissioner of Police

17 Apr 2024 · A. S. Gadkari; Shyam C. Chandak

The Bombay High Court quashed a preventive detention order for non-supply of relied-upon documents, affirming the constitutional requirement of communicating all grounds to enable effective representation under Article 22(5).

constitutional petition_allowed Significant preventive detention Article 22(5) Constitution of India grounds of detention non-supply of documents

Sanjay Kumar Agrawal v. Union of India

17 Apr 2024 · Revati Mohite Dere; Manjusha Deshpande

The Bombay High Court quashed the Look Out Circular against a non-accused petitioner in a PMLA case due to lack of material and procedural non-compliance, affirming the right to travel subject to cooperation.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Look Out Circular Prevention of Money Laundering Act Enforcement Directorate Non-cooperation

Nareshkumar Rajpal Bagdi v. The State of Maharashtra

17 Apr 2024 · A. S. Gadkari; Shyam C. Chandak

The Bombay High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for murder and theft based on a complete and cogent chain of circumstantial evidence excluding all other hypotheses.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence murder theft disclosure statement

Sunanda Sudhakar Thakur & Ors. v. Rajendra Dynaneshwar Khandve

16 Apr 2024 · Milind N. Jadhav

The High Court upheld the Trial Court's rejection of a belated amendment challenging a registered Development Agreement as time-barred and prejudicial, emphasizing judicious exercise of discretion under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.

civil petition_dismissed Significant amendment of pleadings Order VI Rule 17 CPC limitation registered document

Prasanna Karunakar Shetty v. State of Maharashtra

16 Apr 2024 · G. S. Kulkarni; Firdosh P. Pooniwalla

The Bombay High Court quashed attachment orders against a former company director for GST recovery, holding that recovery without prior show cause notice and subjective satisfaction under Sections 79 and 89 of the MGST Act violates fundamental rights.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Maharashtra Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 Section 79 MGST Act Section 89 MGST Act Director liability

Gopal Suresh Malik v. The State of Maharashtra

16 Apr 2024 · A.S. Gadkari; Shyam C. Chandak
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court upheld the preventive detention of a petitioner under the MPDA Act, ruling that his criminal acts had the latent potential to disturb public order and justified detention.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant preventive detention public order law and order MPDA Act

SATCO Capital Markets Ltd. v. Rahul H Bajaj

15 Apr 2024 · G.S. Patel; Neela Gokhale

The Bombay High Court held that a Section 37 appeal against a Section 34 order is strictly limited to grounds considered in the Section 34 petition and dismissed the appeal challenging the arbitral award as perverse or irrational.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge Section 37 appeal patent illegality

Al Jamia Mohammediyah Education Society v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions) & Ors.

15 Apr 2024 · K. R. Shriram; Dr. Neela Gokhale

The Bombay High Court allowed condonation of delay in filing Form No.10B by a charitable trust under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing equitable exercise of discretion in cases of bona fide inadvertent delay.

tax petition_allowed Significant Section 119(2)(b) Income Tax Act condonation of delay Form No.10B charitable trust

Ram Kotumal Issrani v. Directorate of Enforcement

15 Apr 2024 · Revati Mohite Dere; Manjusha Deshpande

The Bombay High Court held that the petitioner’s arrest under PMLA was lawful as he was produced before the Special Court within 24 hours of formal arrest, and condemned overnight interrogation violating the right to sleep.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Article 22(2) Constitution Section 19 PMLA Section 50 PMLA 24-hour production rule

Elliyas Mohammad Gause Momin v. The Union of India

15 Apr 2024 · Revati Mohite Dere; Manjusha Deshpande

The Bombay High Court allowed the petition directing issuance of a passport to a petitioner acquitted in all cases, holding that an adverse police report without pending prosecution is insufficient ground for refusal.

criminal petition_allowed Significant passport refusal adverse police report acquittal Popular Front of India

Abhijit Bhagwat Khedkar v. State of Maharashtra

15 Apr 2024 · A. S. Chandurkar; Jitendra Jain

The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition seeking declaration of class improvement exam results and revised marksheet, holding that failure to appear in all chosen papers and lack of improved class disentitles the petitioner from CIS benefits.

administrative petition_dismissed Class Improvement Scheme Higher Education Ph.D. Admission Revised Marksheet

Rahul Gajanan Tumbada v. State of Maharashtra

15 Apr 2024 · Revati Mohite Dere; Manjusha Deshpande

The Bombay High Court acquitted the appellant in a child sexual assault and murder case due to failure of the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt on circumstantial evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence sexual assault murder Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation v. Mavji Jethalal Rathod

12 Apr 2024 · Sandeep V. Marne

The Bombay High Court upheld the termination of a workman for assaulting his superior officer, rejecting the Industrial Tribunal's reduction of penalty as disproportionate.

labor appeal_allowed Significant industrial dispute disciplinary proceedings assault on superior officer termination of service

Tarun Narainsingh Advani v. Deepak Matai & Ors.

12 Apr 2024 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, CJ; Arif S. Doctor, J
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the 1991 Will was invalid due to lack of free volition and undue influence, emphasizing the heavy burden on the propounder to dispel suspicious circumstances under Section 61 of the Indian Succession Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 61 Section 63 Will validity

Shri Mahendra Bansilal Patil v. Commissioner of Transport

12 Apr 2024 · G. S. Kulkarni; Firdosh P. Pooniwalla

The Bombay High Court quashed the Transport Commissioner's Circular imposing unauthorized conditions for BH series vehicle registration, affirming that Central Motor Vehicles Rules prevail over inconsistent State directives.

administrative petition_allowed Significant BH series registration Central Motor Vehicles Rules 2021 Transport Commissioner Circular Article 254 Constitution

Aditya Ishwardas Rasiwasia & Ishwardas Laxmichand Agarwal v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

12 Apr 2024 · Revati Mohite Dere; Manjusha Deshpande

The Bombay High Court quashed the Look Out Circulars against applicants discharged in a CBI case, holding that their fundamental right to travel cannot be restricted without valid grounds despite a pending challenge to the discharge.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Look Out Circular Section 482 CrPC Discharge order Fundamental right to travel

Baban Vishnu Shivale v. Anil Sukhleswar Markale

12 Apr 2024 · Gauri Godse

The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal order on grounds of delay, latches, and the petitioners' failure to approach the court with clean hands.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Article 227 Constitution of India Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act 1948 Section 32F Section 32P

Harshwardhan Dhanaji Patil v. Vikas Tanaji Patil

10 Apr 2024 · Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition and vacated interim relief in a possession dispute, holding that long-standing possession supported by documentary evidence outweighs unsubstantiated claims of recent dispossession at the interim stage.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant possession unregistered sale deed interim injunction ancestral property

Dattatray Bajrang Naik v. Union of India

10 Apr 2024 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, CJ; Arif S. Doctor, J

The High Court held that the disciplinary authority must independently impose penalties without being bound by vigilance advice, upheld removal of an employee for claiming benefits under an incorrect caste certificate, and ruled that re-verification rules apply prospectively from 1995.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant disciplinary authority Directorate General of Vigilance caste certificate verification Scheduled Tribe category

B-Right Real Estate Limited v. Pune Metropolitan Region Development Authority

10 Apr 2024 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, CJ; Arif S. Doctor, J

The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition seeking extension of bid submission deadline in an e-auction, holding that courts will not interfere in tender timelines absent arbitrariness or mala fide conduct by the authority.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant tender process judicial review e-auction bid submission deadline