High Court of Bombay
5,131 judgments
Nitin Pandurang Shejwal v. The State of Maharashtra
The High Court upheld the Tribunal’s reference of conflicting recruitment cases to a larger Bench despite procedural irregularities in recalling its earlier order, directing maintenance of service status quo pending final decision.
Azaria corp LLP v. Deputy Commissioner of State Tax
The Bombay High Court allowed restoration of GST registration cancelled for non-filing of returns upon full payment of dues, emphasizing proportionality and mutual interest of taxpayer and revenue.
Reliance Communication Limited v. Rajendra P. Bansal
The Bombay High Court held that monies deposited in Court as security for stay of execution remain the property of the depositor pending appeal and that the moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC does not bar withdrawal of such monies, while affirming that jurisdiction over the appeal and interim application lies with the civil court, not the NCLT.
Savita Balaso Niruke v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition seeking grace marks and condonation under university ordinances, holding that the provisions must be strictly interpreted per semester examination and cannot be liberally construed to allow unmeritorious passing.
Sonali Shivram Dupare; Smita Amrut Patil; Tushar Madhukar Shelar v. The Thane District Central Co-operative Bank; The District Deputy Registrar, Thane District Co-operative Societies; The Commissioner of Co-operation Maharashtra State; State of Maharashtr
The Bombay High Court quashed the irregular recruitment process of a co-operative bank and directed a fresh recruitment, holding the writ petition maintainable and emphasizing strict adherence to State guidelines and public interest.
Abdul Rasul Nurallah Virjee and Jalalluddin Nurallah Virjee v. Regal Footwear
The Bombay High Court held that the Plaintiffs’ prior and continuous use of the trademark "REGAL" since 1954 entitled them to injunction against the Defendant’s infringing use, rejecting the Defendant’s defenses of prior user, honest concurrent use, and acquiescence.
Lt. Col. Prasad Purohit v. National Investigation Agency & The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that prosecution of a serving Army officer for the Malegaon blast did not require prior sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C. as the alleged offences were unrelated to his official duties, dismissing his appeal against framing of charges.