High Court of Bombay
5,131 judgments
Max Healthcare Institute Limited v. Touch Healthcare Private Limited
The Bombay High Court upheld the Arbitrator's refusal of interim reliefs, holding that the Term Sheet was not a binding contract and the deadline was not validly extended in writing, limiting court interference under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration Act.
Vijay Nanikram Bhatia & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court upheld the State Government's sanction of Ulhasnagar's revised Development Plan, holding that judicial review is limited to procedural compliance under the MRTP Act and dismissing challenges to the plan's validity.
Janta Housing Private Limited v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court quashed a unilateral Deemed Conveyance order for violating natural justice and remanded the matter for fresh hearing including all affected parties.
Arti Rajesh Karangutkar v. Anna Rocky Fernandes
The Bombay High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the acquittal, and convicted the respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonour of cheque issued in discharge of a legally enforceable debt, clarifying the inapplicability of Section 269-SS of the Income Tax Act to the lender.
Gautam P. Navlakha v. National Investigating Agency & State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court granted bail to Gautam Navlakha in a UAP Act case, holding that mere membership of a banned organization without prima facie involvement in terrorist acts and prolonged pre-trial detention justify bail.
Petit Mansion C-Wing Cooperative Housing Society Limited v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that Section 154B-27 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act is an enforcement provision and does not empower the Registrar to adjudicate ownership or membership disputes, quashing the impugned orders passed under this section.
Harshada Sawant v. Manager of the Jawhar Urban Co.Op. Bank Ltd.
The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition and upheld the Labour Court’s order condoning delay in filing a labour complaint, holding that bona fide belief and pursuit of remedy in a wrong forum justify condonation under labour laws.
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Lalbahadur Z. Gupta
The High Court held that absence of FIR does not preclude fixing negligence in a motor accident claim when the claimant has lodged a complaint and evidence supports the injury.
Gemini Developers v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that conversion of a sole proprietorship developer into a partnership firm comprising only legal heirs does not attract additional fees under the SRA office order, exempting the petitioner from paying the 5% land cost charge.
Rajinder Kaur Jaspal Singh Layal v. The Union of India & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that refusal to renew passports on grounds of a property dispute over the address is arbitrary and violates the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21, directing renewal of passports despite the objection.
Bank of India v. M/s. Maruti Civil Works
The Bombay High Court held that appeals under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 lie only against orders enumerated under Order XLIII CPC, dismissing the appeal challenging rejection of an application under Order VII Rule 10 and 11(d) CPC as not maintainable.
Madhu Deepak Gogri & Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that property given on leave and licence without transfer of ownership cannot be attached under the MPID Act absent malafide transfer, quashing the attachment order and directing release of the shops.
Prashant Gopalrao Chandane v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court set aside a conviction under Section 344 CrPC for giving false evidence, holding that the trial court failed to properly satisfy itself of willful falsehood when acquitting the accused on the same evidence.
M/s. Impex (India) Limited v. Mr. Dinashah Jal Daruwala and Ors.
The Bombay High Court upheld eviction of tenant for unauthorized permanent construction and nuisance on non-tenanted land, affirming Rent Court jurisdiction over acts injurious to tenanted premises and recognizing constructive occupation by landlords.
M/s Ajay Industrial Corporation Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Customs
The Bombay High Court held that interest on delayed customs duty refunds under Section 27A of the Customs Act is payable from three months after the original complete refund application date, rejecting the revenue's attempt to limit interest to a later date.
Swastik Enterprises v. Marianella Properties Pvt. Ltd.
The Bombay High Court condoned a 282-day delay in filing Vakalatnama in a summary suit due to the Defendant's serious medical condition, allowing the Defendant to appear and defend subject to costs.
M/s Railsys Engineers Private Ltd. v. Overseas Infrastructure Alliance Pvt. Ltd.
The Bombay High Court held that a valid arbitration agreement mandates referral of disputes to arbitration, dismissing a summary suit despite an acknowledgment of debt in a subsequent communication.
Nagesh Madhava Suvarna v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that the moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC applies only if the corporate debtor is in actual physical possession, allowing the society to appoint a new developer for rebuilding Govinda Tower after AA Estate's abandonment.
Smt. Sampada Vilas Mahargude v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court upheld the validity of a no-confidence motion against a Sarpanch, ruling that mandatory statutory procedures were complied with despite alleged procedural defects, and dismissed the writ petition challenging the motion.
Global Health Care Products v. Krantikari Kamgar Union
The Bombay High Court held that closure without statutory permission is illegal, entitling named retrenched workmen to reinstatement and benefits, but the Industrial Tribunal cannot grant relief beyond the parties named in the industrial dispute reference.