Delhi High Court

64,846 judgments

Year:

Kritika Narayan v. High Court of Delhi

08 Feb 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:1015-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the revised answer key in the DJS Preliminary Examination, ruling that criminal breach of trust under Sections 405/406 IPC requires dishonest intention, and dismissed the petition challenging the answer key.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant criminal breach of trust Section 405 IPC Section 406 IPC dishonest intention

Sadulram & Anr. v. Retail Royalty Company & Anr.

08 Feb 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:1209-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld a permanent injunction against appellants for trademark infringement but set aside the costs awarded to respondents due to lack of infringement findings, emphasizing the anti-dissection rule and appellants' abandonment of the mark.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off permanent injunction anti-dissection rule

Srinivas Gundamuni v. Union of India & Ors.

08 Feb 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:965-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of Non Availability Certificate and stoppage of House Rent Allowance where the petitioner failed to show willingness to occupy government accommodation once it became available.

administrative petition_dismissed Non Availability Certificate House Rent Allowance Government accommodation Cancellation of NAC

Janakraj & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

08 Feb 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:940

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 354, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC amicable settlement

Harish Kumar Kathuria & Anr. v. Sanjay Gupta & Ors.

08 Feb 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:911-DB

An appeal under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 is maintainable only against an order imposing punishment for contempt; an order merely holding a party guilty without punishment is not appealable, and such premature appeal must be dismissed.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 19 appeal Contempt of court Punishment for contempt

V. VIKRAMAN v. Union of India

08 Feb 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:1058-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging a 2001 charge-sheet as barred by res judicata and held that a review petition under CCS (CCA) Rules cannot reopen finally adjudicated disciplinary proceedings.

administrative petition_dismissed charge-sheet disciplinary proceedings res judicata constructive res judicata

Kripa Narain Shahi and Anr. v. New Delhi Municipal Council

08 Feb 2024 · Rekha Palli; Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2024:DHC:943-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the review petition to recall its earlier dismissal of the writ petition, holding that an apparent error regarding the petitioners' educational qualifications warranted a fresh hearing on merits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant review petition regularisation educational qualification Lift Operator

Oma Ram v. State of GNCTD

08 Feb 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:970

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application, holding that timely filing of the charge-sheet and cognizance preclude statutory bail despite incomplete investigation or identification issues.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant statutory bail Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. charge-sheet completeness identification parade

Satish Kumar Malik v. Union of India and Ors.

08 Feb 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:1077-DB

The Delhi High Court held that recovery of mistaken excess payments from a Group-C government employee's salary without prior notice is unlawful and directed refund of all deducted amounts.

administrative petition_allowed Significant recovery of salary Group-C employees mistaken payment natural justice

EX AC UT VINAY KUMAR PANDEY v. Union of India and Ors.

08 Feb 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:926-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging denial of disability pension for a mental disorder detected within one week of enrolment, holding the disease was pre-existing and not attributable to military service.

administrative petition_dismissed disability pension mental disorder military service pre-existing disease

Dnyaneshwar Hiralal Phuse v. Union of India & Anr.

08 Feb 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:975

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of examination rules disallowing grace marks in practicals, prohibiting re-evaluation, and maintaining confidentiality of OSCE exam content, holding they do not violate Article 14 or other legal rights.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 14 grace marks re-evaluation OSCE

IMC LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

08 Feb 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:1036

The Delhi High Court restrained IOCL from continuing unauthorized pipeline construction on a route exclusively authorized to IMC Limited under the PNGRB Act, pending adjudication.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board Act, 2006 Section 16 PNGRB Act pipeline authorization unauthorized pipeline construction

Maj Vishal v. Union of India and Ors

08 Feb 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:904-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's dismissal of a petition seeking Permanent Commission beyond the sanctioned vacancies, holding that legitimate expectation applies only to candidates within the approved merit list and filling vacancies is discretionary.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Permanent Commission Short Service Commission Departmental Permanent Commission Legitimate Expectation

DR VP MAINRA v. M/S DAWSONS LEASING LTD. & ORS.

08 Feb 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:917

The Delhi High Court held ex-directors liable for fraudulent concealment and misappropriation of sale proceeds during company liquidation, ordering repayment with interest and authorizing prosecution under Section 538 of the Companies Act, 1956.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Companies Act, 1956 Section 538 winding up Official Liquidator

Jeena v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

08 Feb 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:920

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to a woman accused in a sexual offences case, applying the proviso to Section 437(1) CrPC and emphasizing the impermissibility of indefinite pre-trial detention.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 437(1) CrPC POCSO Act pre-conviction detention

Krishna Dixit v. Union of India and Ors.

08 Feb 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:910-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging disciplinary proceedings and punishments imposed on an Indian Coast Guard personnel for unauthorized absence and misconduct, upholding the legality of the summary trial and recovery of pay.

administrative petition_dismissed Indian Coast Guard Act, 1978 Summary Trial Absence Without Leave Disciplinary Proceedings

Sanjeev Kumar Panchal & Ors. v. State (GNCTD) & Anr.

08 Feb 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:928

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 323, 509, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

Rajender Pal & Anr v. Anita Kanthwal & Anr

08 Feb 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:893
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that insurers remain initially liable to pay compensation in motor accident claims even if the vehicle was driven by a minor without a valid licence, with rights to recover from the insured thereafter.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim insurance liability fundamental breach minor driver

Devi @ Jarina v. State

08 Feb 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:919

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to a woman accused under serious IPC and POCSO charges, applying the first proviso to Section 437(1) CrPC and considering parity, long incarceration, and presumption of innocence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 437(1) CrPC POCSO Act parity in bail

Bela Creation Pvt Ltd v. Jai Durga Traders Pvt Ltd

08 Feb 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:1002-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal for failure to deposit the court-ordered security and because the related appeal against the final decree was withdrawn, leaving no issue to be decided.

civil appeal_dismissed conditional leave to defend deposit of security appeal dismissal final judgment