Delhi High Court

64,846 judgments

Year:

Puran Singh@ Vipin v. State (NCT of Delhi)

08 Feb 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:1054

The Delhi High Court held that a one month gap between subsequent furlough applications after surrender is a valid eligibility condition enforceable by Standing Orders supplementing prison rules, dismissing the petition but directing the Competent Authority to decide the pending application on merits.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant furlough Delhi Prison Rules 2018 Standing Order No. 1/2019 one month gap

Mukesh Saini v. Madan Lal Saini thr LRs and Ors.

08 Feb 2024 · Acting Chief Justice Manmohan; Ms. Justice Manmeet Pritam Si... · 2024:DHC:1059-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal in a partition suit, upholding sale deed execution to prospective purchasers and holding that failure to make a bona fide offer bars relief under res judicata and abuse of process doctrines.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant partition suit Agreement to Sell res judicata abuse of process

Shrishti Borthakur; Ritika Meena; Parkhi Raj v. State (GNCT) of Delhi

08 Feb 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:1035-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the production of a missing minor girl and granted her custody to her mother after recording her statement and ensuring her welfare.

criminal petition_allowed Habeas Corpus missing minor Article 226 Section 482 Cr.P.C.

CGMP PHARMA N PLANS PRIVATE LIMITED v. HYS LIFECARE LLP

08 Feb 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:1007

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for appointment of a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, holding that limitation issues including Covid-19 extension are to be decided by the arbitrator and not at the appointment stage.

arbitration appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 appointment of arbitrator limitation

Jita Mal Satpal v. Bhiwadi Polymers Ltd

08 Feb 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:1009-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against a recovery suit judgment, holding that an unproved document could not be relied upon to adjust the claimed amount.

civil appeal_dismissed proof of document representative signature adjustment of amount recovery suit

Bijender Singh v. State & Anr.

08 Feb 2024 · Jasmeet Singh · 2024:DHC:924

The Delhi High Court set aside the order directing FIR registration against a police officer under the SC/ST Act for dereliction of duty, holding that such charges require prior administrative enquiry and that the court cannot interfere with the investigation process at the pre-cognizance stage.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant SC/ST Act administrative enquiry FIR registration public servant

Sourya Majumdar and Ors. v. Jawaharlal Nehru University

08 Feb 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:2292

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a penalty order as premature since an appeal was pending, directing the appellate authority to decide the appeal within two weeks.

administrative appeal_dismissed writ petition premature petition appeal appellate authority

School of Physical Education and Sports Development, OPJS University v. National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

08 Feb 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · (2015) 150 DRJ 267

The Delhi High Court held that formal recognition under Section 14(4) of the NCTE Act is not conditional on university affiliation and dismissed the NCTE's review petition seeking to delay issuance of recognition to the petitioner institution.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 Section 14(4) NCTE Act formal recognition affiliation

MS Royal Furnishers v. Multitex Filtration Engineers Ltd

08 Feb 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:6177

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve contractual disputes where parties failed to amicably settle despite arbitration clauses.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) appointment of arbitrator arbitration clause

OYNX MANAGEMENT SERVICES PVT.LTD AND ANR v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

07 Feb 2024 · ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE; SANJEEV NARULA · 2024:DHC:953-DB

The court held that a general GeM clarification did not amend GAIL's tender conditions and dismissed the petition challenging the contract award to the lowest bidder under the original terms.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant tender process bid amendment Government e-Marketplace GeM clarification

Arun Goel v. Union of India

07 Feb 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:1024-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that GST concession applications submitted before a policy amendment must be considered under the policy in force at the time of submission, directing grant of concession and refund if eligible.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST concession certificate policy amendment retrospective application Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017

M/S SRI KRISHAN TRADERS v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF GOODS AND SERVICE TAX NORTH DELHI

07 Feb 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:1026-DB

The Delhi High Court held that GST registration cancellation should be effective from the date of the petitioner's application and directed compliance with furnishing requisite details for tax assessment.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST registration cancellation Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 29 CGST Act Rule 20 CGST Rules

TTK Prestige Limited v. Baghla Sanitaryware Private Limited & Ors.

07 Feb 2024 · Anish Dayal, J. · 2024:DHC:1149

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's belated application to file additional documents in a commercial trademark infringement suit, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural timelines under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and the necessity to establish reasonable cause for non-disclosure.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC Commercial Courts Act, 2015 additional documents reasonable cause

Sanjay Singh v. Directorate of Enforcement

07 Feb 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:906
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of Sanjay Singh in a money laundering case under PMLA, holding that the mandatory twin conditions under Section 45 PMLA were not satisfied based on corroborated evidence including approver statements and call records.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act Section 45 PMLA bail in money laundering cases approver testimony

Nanak Chand v. Arunachal Bhawan

07 Feb 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:1398
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking execution of a labour award and pension benefits after an 18-year delay, holding that writ jurisdiction cannot be used as a substitute for execution proceedings and stale claims barred by delay and laches.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Article 226 writ jurisdiction execution of award doctrine of delay and laches

Suresh Chander Kapoor v. N.D.M.C.

07 Feb 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:1493

The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's award dismissing a casual worker's claim of illegal termination, holding that termination after a valid vigilance inquiry without domestic enquiry is lawful for casual employees lacking continuous service.

labor petition_dismissed Significant casual worker termination vigilance inquiry Article 311

M/S UNISYS INFOSOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. v. GURBANI MEDIA PVT. LTD.

07 Feb 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:1432

The Delhi High Court held that the arbitration was validly invoked within limitation, excluding negotiation time, and appointed a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes under the Content Assignment Agreement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 Notice of Invocation Limitation

Vifor (International) Limited & Anr. v. MSN Laboratories Pvt Ltd & Anr.

07 Feb 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:878-DB

The Delhi High Court clarified that product-by-process patent claims protect the novel product itself irrespective of the process used by alleged infringers, allowing the appellants' appeal and granting interim relief.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant product-by-process claims patent infringement claim construction novelty

Abhishek Srivastava v. Shruti Srivastava

07 Feb 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:1124-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the husband's appeal against an interim maintenance order of Rs. 25,000 per month to the wife, holding the order reasonable despite the lawyers' strike and the wife's stipend income.

family appeal_dismissed interim maintenance Family Court lawyers strike stipend income

Nirmal v. Gunwant Kaur Sethi

07 Feb 2024 · Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:881

The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order against a tenant for failure to file leave to contest within time, affirming the limited revisional scope under proviso to Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act Section 14(1)(e) eviction petition leave to contest