Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
National Law University, Delhi v. Dhyey Bakshi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Single Judge's order that kept the writ petition pending while relegating the respondent to the appellate remedy under sexual harassment regulations, holding no concurrent jurisdiction was created.
Suman Kumar & Ors. v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement between the parties.
Sandeep Singh & Ors. v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.
Salim & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 324, 341, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties and directed the petitioners to plant saplings instead of imposing costs.
Shreyas Tiwari & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes under Sections 498A, 406, 354D, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Rakesh Gupta v. The State (NCT) of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354A, 506, 509, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes on the basis of an amicable settlement and the scope of Section 528 BNSS to prevent abuse of process.
Ram Babu v. New India Assurance Company Limited & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking seniority and promotion benefits after over 30 years delay, reaffirming that stale claims affecting settled seniority and promotions are barred by delay and laches.
MS INAM AND CO. v. AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ORS
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that a broad notice of claims suffices to invoke arbitration despite lack of detailed quantification.
Kotak Mahindra Prime Limited v. Nikhil Jain
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a loan agreement containing an arbitration clause, despite the respondent's non-participation.
Sporta Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. John Doe and Others
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction against defendants using deceptively similar marks to 'DREAM11', holding them liable for trademark infringement and passing off in an uncontested suit disposed under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC.
DR. AZEEM v. STATE
The Delhi High Court quashed charges against a diagnostic centre operator under Section 19 of the POCSO Act, holding that mere suspicion without grave knowledge of sexual assault is insufficient to frame charges.
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – Central -1 v. Naveen Infradevelopers & Engineers Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that no additions can be made on grounds not recorded in the reopening notice under Section 147 if no addition is made on the recorded grounds, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.
Randa Chehab v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of a foreign national challenging her blacklisting for allegedly raising public funds in India on a business visa, holding that such conduct violates visa conditions and justifies blacklisting under the Foreigners Act.
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -Central -1 v. Anil Bhalla
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal and condonation application for delay, holding that no incriminating material was found to sustain additions under Section 68 and that the delay caused by the COVID-19 pandemic was insufficient to justify condonation.
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -Central -1 v. Sahara India Financial Corporation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the deletion of Section 14A disallowance where the assessee had no exempt income for AY 2016-17, holding that the Finance Act 2022 explanation is prospective and not applicable retrospectively.
Sporta Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. Hong Yi F35 and Others
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunctions and domain transfer in favor of Dream11 for trademark and copyright infringement by a mirror website, disposing of the uncontested suit under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC.
Kingston Enterprises v. NBCC (India) Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the enforceability of a 'pay-when-paid' clause in a back-to-back subcontract, dismissing the writ petition for payment against NBCC and NSG due to the petitioner’s entitlement being contingent on NBCC receiving funds from NSG.
Miss G. v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking directions for stringent police action, holding that interference with investigation under Article 226 is warranted only in rare cases of abuse of power or procedural violation.
DHARAMRAJ CONTRACT INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. ENPEECOM
The High Court set aside the Trial Court's order directing a bank guarantee under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 CPC due to lack of positive material justifying attachment before judgment.
Havells India Limited v. Electromech India Private Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and awarded costs against habitual infringers for unauthorized use of a registered ceiling fan design despite their undertaking and non-contestation.