Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Naveen Shokeen v. State NCT of Delhi

23 Jan 2026 · Vikas Mahajan · 2026:DHC:595

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of murder and related offences based on weak circumstantial evidence and prolonged pre-trial custody, imposing conditions to ensure trial attendance.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail circumstantial evidence identification DNA evidence

Vandana Rana v. Bal Singh Rana & Ors.

23 Jan 2026 · Subramonium Prasad · 2026:DHC:620
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a plaint challenging a Will is not barred by limitation if the plaintiff pleads delayed knowledge of the Will's contents, and rejected the defendant's application for dismissal under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC Order X Rule 2 CPC limitation attesting witness

Suman Sankar Bhunia v. Debarati Bhunia Chakraborty

23 Jan 2026 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar
Cites 2 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's custody award to the father, emphasizing the paramountcy of the children's welfare over rigid doctrines, parental alienation, and procedural propriety in custody disputes.

family appeal_dismissed Significant child custody welfare of the child parental alienation tender years doctrine

Pranav Gupta v. Adeesh Gupta & Ors.

23 Jan 2026 · Mini Pushkarna · 2026:DHC:616

The Delhi High Court held that parties' consent to arbitrate all disputes arising from a Will, partnership deeds, and partition matters must be given effect by appointing an arbitrator and referring the disputes to arbitration, vacating interim relief subject to security deposit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration Will dispute partition suit partnership deed

S.K. Tandon & Anr. v. Securities and Exchange Board of India & Anr.

23 Jan 2026 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar

The Delhi High Court upheld SEBI's authority to conduct a forensic audit and reconstitute the winding up committee, affirming that prior judicial embargoes on payments to CRB Group entities remain binding and that the Special Committee failed in its fiduciary duties.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Special Committee SEBI Mutual Fund Regulations Forensic Audit

XXX v. State (NCT of Delhi)

23 Jan 2026 · Chandrasekharan Sudha · 2026:DHC:541
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction for digital rape under Section 376(2)(f) IPC based on credible victim and witness testimony despite absence of medical evidence and procedural non-compliance.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant digital rape Section 376(2)(f) IPC victim testimony medical evidence

Capital Land Builders Pvt. Ltd v. M/S Shaheed Memorial Scty. & Ors.

23 Jan 2026 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition against a non-party shareholder, holding that contempt liability requires clear proof of wilful disobedience and that injunctions bind only parties or those acting in concert with them.

civil petition_dismissed Significant contempt of court injunction Order XXXIX Rule 2-A CPC wilful disobedience

Shukvinder Singh @ Sanju v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

23 Jan 2026 · Vikas Mahajan · 2026:DHC:597

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a murder case due to contradictory eyewitness evidence and prolonged custody despite the serious nature of the offence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail contradictory eyewitness testimony hostile witness long custody

Khushi & Ors. v. Union of India

23 Jan 2026 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2026:DHC:615
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal of legal heirs and held that death of a bona fide passenger due to an untoward incident on a train journey entitles compensation under the Railways Act's strict liability provisions.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Railways Act, 1989 untoward incident strict liability Section 124A

Vedanta Limited v. Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation Ltd

23 Jan 2026 · Subramonium Prasad · 2026:DHC:617

The Delhi High Court held that it had jurisdiction to appoint an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act despite the involvement of a foreign joint venture partner, dismissing the Respondent's application to recall the order and affirming that jurisdictional and arbitrability issues are to be decided by the Arbitral Tribunal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) international commercial arbitration jurisdiction

M/S AEROCOMFORT ANUSHKA JV v. M/S KRYPTON HEIGHT BUILDERS & INFRASTRUCTURE

23 Jan 2026 · Subramonium Prasad · 2026:DHC:618

The Delhi High Court allowed defendants to amend their written statement at an early stage to include material facts related to a cross-suit, while directing separate leave for documents not disclosed earlier.

civil appeal_allowed Significant amendment of pleadings Order VI Rule 17 CPC Order XI Rule 1(10) CPC dishonoured cheque

Deepak Tara v. Baij Nath Tara & Ors.

23 Jan 2026 · Subramonium Prasad · 2026:DHC:619

The Delhi High Court upheld the plaintiff's right to access and possess his claimed share of the property under a status quo order, restraining defendants from obstructing him, following a criminal conviction for forgery affecting property mutation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant partition suit status quo order interim injunction property mutation

NHPC Limited v. Chairman-cum-Managing Director, M/S Patel-L&T Consortium-Parbati HE Project Stage-III

23 Jan 2026 · Subramonium Prasad · 2026:DHC:621

The Delhi High Court held that a petitioner pursuing arbitration award challenge in courts lacking jurisdiction bona fide is entitled to exclusion of such time under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, allowing condonation of delay in filing the petition before the competent court.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 14 Limitation Act Section 34 Arbitration Act territorial jurisdiction condonation of delay

MS. SUMITA BANU v. SMT LALITA RATHI

23 Jan 2026 · HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR · 2026:DHC:607
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, judicial scrutiny is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed an arbitrator accordingly, leaving merits and frivolity issues to the arbitral tribunal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 11(6) Arbitration and Conciliation Act appointment of arbitrator scope of judicial scrutiny prima facie arbitration agreement

Ravi Aggarwal v. Deputy Director Enforcement Directorate

23 Jan 2026 · Navin Chawla; Ravinder Dudeja · 2026:DHC:628-DB

The Delhi High Court held that retention of property under the PMLA without a valid Section 20 order is illegal and violates constitutional property rights, setting aside the impugned order.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2017 Section 20 PMLA Section 17 PMLA Retention of property

The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement v. M/S PMT Machines Limited

23 Jan 2026 · Navin Chawla; Ravinder Dudeja · 2026:DHC:606-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the ED's appeal against quashing of attachment of mortgage properties under PMLA, directing restoration of properties to the Resolution Applicant following settlement and approval of Resolution Plan.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act Section 8(8) PMLA attachment of property proceeds of crime

Union of India v. Manoj Kumar Singh

23 Jan 2026 · V. Kameswar Rao; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2026:DHC:588-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of disability pension to an ex-serviceman with Diabetes Mellitus Type-II, affirming that the burden to disprove service connection lies on the administration under the 2008 Entitlement Rules.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension armed forces attributability aggravation

Union of India v. Sanjay Kumar Sharma

23 Jan 2026 · V. Kameswar Rao; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2026:DHC:589-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of disability pension under the 2008 Entitlement Rules, holding that the burden to disprove attributability or aggravation of disability lies on the armed forces administration and mere onset at peace station does not negate entitlement.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Entitlement Rules 2008 attributability and aggravation Armed Forces Tribunal

Union of India & Ors. v. 681225B Ex MWO Asis Pramanik

23 Jan 2026 · V. Kameswar Rao; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2026:DHC:592-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of disability pension under the 2008 Entitlement Rules, holding that the administration bears the burden to disprove attributability or aggravation of disability by military service.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension 2008 Entitlement Rules attributability aggravation

Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd v. M/S Garuda Urban Remedies Ltd

23 Jan 2026 · Vivek Chaudhary; Renu Bhatnagar

The Delhi High Court held that a licensee cannot withhold payment of license fee and electricity charges while continuing possession during arbitration, directing payment of all dues pending arbitration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 license fee electricity charges possession