Delhi High Court
49,377 judgments
Aakash Educational Services Ltd v. Parvesh Kumar Dhiman
The Delhi High Court held that a unilateral arbitrator appointment clause is unenforceable and appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve the dispute.
Aakash Educational Services Limited v. Vivek Srivastava
The Delhi High Court held that unilateral appointment of an arbitrator is impermissible and directed reference of employment disputes to arbitration under DIAC with a neutral arbitrator appointed by the institution.
Sumita Rastogi v. Gaurav Rastogi
The Delhi High Court allowed the transfer of a family law case to consolidate interconnected proceedings before one court to ensure expeditious justice.
M/S Hotline Fashion India Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Sentinel Consultants Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of a transferee pendente lite challenging execution of a decree for possession of a basement, holding that such a transferee cannot resist execution under Order XXI Rule 97 CPC and Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act.
M/S Chehak Fashions v. Commissioner, Delhi GST
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration under Section 29(2) CGST Act requires objective satisfaction and proper notice, modifying the cancellation date to the Show Cause Notice date and allowing the petition.
Vishal Banga v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of probate for NRE fixed deposits under a Will, holding that the condition of maintaining bank guarantees ceased upon loan repayment, validating the bequest to the beneficiary.
Sandeep Pawar v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court denied interim bail on medical grounds but directed the accused to be admitted to AIIMS for specialized treatment under custody, balancing his health rights with the gravity of the offence.
M/S COSMOS INFRABUILD PRIVATE LIMITED v. M/S KALYAN JEWELLERS INDIA LIMITED
The Delhi High Court upheld the injunction restraining the lessor from interfering with the lessee's possession, holding that the security deposit must be refunded subject only to specified deductions before possession can be handed over.
GSK Consumer Healthcare S.A. v. Celebrity Biopharma Ltd. and Anr.
The Delhi High Court cancelled the trademark “OTRINIR” for being deceptively similar to GSK’s prior registered marks “OTRIVIN” and “OTRINOZ”, affirming the petitioner’s exclusive rights and rejecting the respondent’s claim of genericness.
Union of India v. M/S PNSC Infrastructure Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal against the dismissal of a delayed Section 34 petition challenging an arbitral award, holding that the limitation period restarts upon return of the petition and delay cannot be condoned without sufficient cause.
Union of India v. M/S. Tech Mahindra Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award, holding that the award did not suffer from patent illegality and the arbitrator's contract interpretation and factual findings were justified.
MUFG Bank Ltd v. Commissioner of Income Tax 2 & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, an assessee can settle individual appeals independently without settling all appeals for the same assessment year.
MUFG BANK LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 & ANR
The Delhi High Court held that under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, a taxpayer can settle one or more disputes arising from an assessment year without settling all pending appeals or petitions.
Nandini Rai v. The State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of FIR alleging harassment and impersonation on Instagram, holding that the FIR discloses cognizable offences and investigation must be allowed to continue.
Sangeeta Beri v. Chander Kant Beri
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's dismissal of the petitioner's application for judgment on admission, holding that the respondent's defenses raised factual disputes requiring trial.
LARSEN AND TOUBARO LIMITED AND PASSAVANT ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT GMBH JV v. COMMISSIONER OF DELHI GOODS AND SERVICE TAX AND ANOTHER
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under Section 73 CGST for failing to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication with opportunity of hearing.
Rajesh Kumar Sehrawat v. Laxmi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's appeal against eviction after lease expiry and rent default, upholding the eviction decree and denying further indulgence.
Upakarma Ayurveda Private Limited v. Rasayanum Enterprises
The Delhi High Court upheld the plaintiff's injunction against the defendant's deceptively similar trade dress for 'PURE SHILAJIT' products, allowing the defendant a limited period to adopt distinctive packaging for one product variant.
Pidilite Industries Ltd. v. Sanjay Jain & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking removal of the respondent's trademark 'POMA-EX KIWKHEAL', holding that the petitioner has no exclusive rights over the word 'KWIK' and the marks are not deceptively similar.
K.C.P INDIA v. THE COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND TAXES & ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration under Section 29(2) CGST Act requires objective reasons and opportunity to the taxpayer, and modified the cancellation date to the petitioner's application date.