Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Surender Kumar Badhwar v. Abhay Pratap Singh Raghuwanshi

22 Oct 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:8896

The High Court dismissed the revision petition upholding the trial court's order rejecting a decree on admissions in an ejectment suit due to absence of clear admissions and presence of disputed factual defenses.

civil appeal_dismissed Order XII Rule 6 CPC decree on admissions landlord-tenant relationship ejectment suit

Manoj Arora v. Shri Jatinder Jain & Ors.

22 Oct 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:8962

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging the rejection of an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that court fee assessment depends on the relief granted and cannot be contested at the preliminary stage.

civil appeal_dismissed Order VII Rule 11 CPC court fee assessment valuation of suit property mandatory injunction

Kamal Mahajan & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT Delhi & Anr.

22 Oct 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:8190

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC amicable settlement

Anand Singh Panwar and Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

22 Oct 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8221-DB

The Delhi High Court directed retrospective grant of replacement pay scale benefits from 01.01.1996 to similarly placed CAPF personnel, following earlier judicial precedents, subject to limitation on arrears.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant replacement pay scale 5th Central Pay Commission retrospective pay fixation Central Armed Police Forces

Harish Chand & Ors. v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr

22 Oct 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:8189

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC read with Dowry Prohibition Act following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Dowry Prohibition Act amicable settlement

Vikash @ Vicky v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

21 Oct 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:8110

The Delhi High Court granted bail to an accused charged with commercial quantity narcotics offences under the NDPS Act due to prolonged pre-trial custody and procedural lapses, emphasizing that statutory bail restrictions do not bar bail where trial delay violates fundamental rights.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS Act bail commercial quantity

Neeraj Mittal v. Subhash Sachdeva & Ors.

21 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:8203

The Delhi High Court directed the Registrar of the State Consumer Commission to procure records from the District Forum to facilitate hearing of a seven-year pending appeal, without imposing a strict timeline for disposal.

civil other Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission appeal delay record production Registrar duties

Kumeshwar Dayal Sammi v. The State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) & Ors.

21 Oct 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:8206-DB

The Delhi High Court declared an earlier family settlement and relinquishment deed null and void and directed fresh execution of documents to give effect to a court-recorded family settlement under Order XXXII A CPC.

civil petition_allowed Significant family settlement relinquishment deed Order XXXII A CPC Article 226 Constitution

KKH FINVEST PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. v. JONAS HAGGARD & ORS.

21 Oct 2024 · Jasmeet Singh · 2024:DHC:8116
Cites 5 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, only a prima facie view on the existence of arbitration agreement and non-signatories' status is required, leaving complex jurisdictional issues to the arbitral tribunal, and dismissed the petition seeking appointment of arbitrator against non-signatories and consolidation of proceedings.

arbitration petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 Non-signatories Group of Companies Doctrine

Naresh Kumar Bajaj; Ashwini Kumar Bajaj; Vikram Kumar Bajaj v. Bunge India Pvt. Ltd.

21 Oct 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:8134
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court upheld a Nil Arbitral Award dismissing claims for service tax liability and related costs after the tax demand was quashed by CESTAT, holding no grounds existed to set aside the award under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 petition Nil Award Service Tax liability

Ethiopian Airlines v. Nitin Dewan

21 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:8195

The Delhi High Court disposed of the consumer dispute between Ethiopian Airlines and Mr. Nitin Dewan by approving an amicable settlement awarding half the compensation for lost baggage due to airline negligence.

consumer petition_allowed consumer dispute deficiency of service loss of baggage delay condonation

Shri Rohit Bodhraja & Anr. v. Avtar Kumar Grover & Ors.

21 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:8184

The Delhi High Court held that summons in eviction proceedings must align with the procedural requirements of all grounds at issuance, and subsequent withdrawal of a ground does not retrospectively validate improper summons issuance.

civil other Significant Delhi Rent Control Act eviction petition Section 14(1)(a) Section 14(1)(e)

Rajesh Khanna v. M/S OLAM AGRO INDIA LTD

21 Oct 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna

The Delhi High Court held that the appellate court must hear the accused before directing deposit of 20% of fine under Section 148 N.I. Act and may exempt deposit in exceptional circumstances.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 148 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 389 Cr.P.C. deposit of fine

Tanu Gupta v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

21 Oct 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:8136

The court upheld the lawful eviction of a daughter-in-law from a shared household owned by her father-in-law, directing provision of alternate accommodation or rent under the DV Act, balancing her right to residence with the property owner's rights.

family petition_dismissed Significant Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 shared household right to residence interim protection

Dewan Izzat Rai Nanda Thru LR's v. Dewan Iqbal Nath Thru LR's and Ors.

21 Oct 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:8119

The Delhi High Court held that interest accrued on auction money deposited by the purchaser in a partition suit belongs to the parties entitled to the principal amount as per the final decree, directing refund of interest previously released to the purchaser.

civil other Significant partition suit auction money interest accrued final decree

Madhya Pradesh State Electricity Board v. Union of India

21 Oct 2024 · Prateek Jalan
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld the Union of India's final allocation of Central sector power between Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh under the Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act, affirming administrative discretion in resource allocation subject to judicial review of the decision-making process.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 Central sector power allocation Gadgil Formula Section 75(2)

Sandeep Raina v. Sachin Sharma

21 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:8173

The High Court directed the Trial Court to first hear the petitioner's application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC based on admissions before proceeding with trial in a possession and eviction suit.

civil other Order XII Rule 6 CPC admissions in written statement possession suit eviction

Jasbir Kaur & Anr. v. Ravinder Singh Alias Ravinder Malik & Ors.

21 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:8174

The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition as not pressed and directed the Appellate Tribunal MCD to expeditiously dispose of the pending demolition appeal within six months.

administrative petition_dismissed Article 226 Appellate Tribunal MCD demolition stay expeditious disposal

Sweta Pradip Popat v. Larsen and Turbo Ltd

21 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:8176
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Article 227 for lack of jurisdiction, holding that the challenge to NCDRC orders must be filed in the High Court where the cause of action arose.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Article 227 jurisdiction National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission cause of action

Pyare Lal v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

21 Oct 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:8105
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a Section 363 IPC case involving alleged wrongful confinement of a minor, emphasizing the right to liberty amid trial delays and unresolved age discrepancies.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 363 IPC minor victim age discrepancy