Delhi High Court

49,371 judgments

Year:

United India Insurance Co Ltd v. Jagat & Ors

15 Apr 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:2974
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a mechanically propelled crane is a motor vehicle attracting mandatory third party insurance liability, upheld insurer's liability despite a CPM policy and fake driver license, and suo motu enhanced compensation for a claimant with 100% permanent disability.

motor_vehicle_accident_compensation review_allowed_in_part Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 2(28) Third party insurance liability Contractor's Plant and Machinery policy

M TECH DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. v. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI & ANR.

15 Apr 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2024:DHC:2921-DB

The Delhi High Court held that once a Resolution Plan is approved under Section 31 of the IBC, tax authorities are barred from initiating assessments or reassessments for pre-approval periods under the Income Tax Act.

tax petition_allowed Significant Section 31 IBC Resolution Plan Income Tax Act Section 144B Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process

Devinder Kumar and Ors. v. The State and Anr.

15 Apr 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:3001

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC

Subnam Gupta v. Union of India

15 Apr 2024 · The Acting Chief Justice; Ms. Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh A... · 2024:DHC:3082-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the Financial Commissioner retains jurisdiction to adjudicate appeals against pre-urbanization SDM orders under the DLR Act despite subsequent urbanization notifications, restoring the appellant's appeal for merits hearing.

property appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Land Revenue Act, 1954 Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 urbanization notification

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pawan Kumar Sharma & Ors.

15 Apr 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2013(9) SCC 54
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer's appeal reducing compensation for the death of the claimant's wife by treating it as loss to estate due to lack of financial dependency, clarifying principles for assessing compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation loss of dependency loss to estate

Govt. of NCT of Delhi v. Jagbir Singh

15 Apr 2024 · Rekha Palli; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:2994-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order setting aside the extension of suspension beyond 90 days without issuance of a charge sheet, emphasizing timely disciplinary action and adherence to DoPT guidelines.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant suspension charge sheet Central Vigilance Commission Group A officer

Anisa Singh and Anr v. Sir Sobha Singh Public Charitable Trust and Ors

15 Apr 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:2966

The Delhi High Court held that a suit for mandatory injunction against an ex-licensee is effectively a suit for possession attracting mesne profits under Order XX Rule 12 CPC and upheld the Trial Court's order directing payment of mesne profits at market rent rates.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant mandatory injunction ex-licensee mesne profits Order XV-A CPC

Mohd. Bilal v. The State of NCT of Delhi

15 Apr 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:3006
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of murder and conspiracy, emphasizing the subsidiary role, completed investigation, parity with co-accused, and the principle that recovery and CDR are corroborative evidence insufficient alone to deny bail.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant regular bail Section 439 CrPC murder criminal conspiracy

Arun Kumar @ Varun v. Narcotics Control Bureau

15 Apr 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:3058

The Delhi High Court held that at the stage of framing charges under the NDPS Act, the existence of a prima facie case suffices and dismissed the petition challenging the framing of charges against the accused.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant framing of charges prima facie case NDPS Act disclosure statement

Joginder Singh Gill v. Union of India

15 Apr 2024 · Acting Chief Justice Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:3077-DB

The Delhi High Court held that retired employees of a party are not disqualified from acting as arbitrators under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, dismissing the petition challenging their appointment.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 12(5) Fifth Schedule Seventh Schedule

Dabur India Limited v. Ashok Kumar and Ors.

15 Apr 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh

The Delhi High Court directed banks and law enforcement agencies to implement updated SOPs ensuring timely information exchange to combat cybercrime involving unauthorized domain name registrations infringing trademark rights.

cyberlaw other Significant domain name infringement trademark rights Standard Operating Procedures Indian Bank Association

Doon Valley Institute of Education v. National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

12 Apr 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:3860

The Delhi High Court set aside the withdrawal of recognition of a teacher education institution on the ground that change of its managing body from a registered society to a company without statutory prohibition does not justify withdrawal under the NCTE Act.

administrative petition_allowed Significant NCTE recognition withdrawal of recognition change of management registered society

NCE TECHNOLOGIES INDIA LLP v. DLF UNIVERSAL LTD

11 Apr 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:6372

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve disputes arising from a lease deed containing a valid arbitration clause.

civil appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Appointment of arbitrator Lease deed dispute

Mohd Zahid v. Sales Tax Officer Class II/Avto Ward 10 Zone 2, State GST, Delhi

10 Apr 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:2968-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order for failure to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remanded the matter for re-adjudication with opportunity of hearing.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 73 CGST Act Input Tax Credit Show Cause Notice

M/S BOXCOWORLD LOGISTICS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA

10 Apr 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:2971-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under Section 73 CGST Act for failure to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after a personal hearing.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 73 CGST Act Show Cause Notice Input Tax Credit

Spinclabs Private Limited v. The Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax and Ors.

10 Apr 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:3127-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside GST demand and penalty orders for failure to consider detailed replies and violation of natural justice, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication with personal hearing.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 73 CGST Act Input Tax Credit Show Cause Notice

Bakshi Aerosole v. Commissioner of DGST Delhi

10 Apr 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:3125-DB

The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires objective satisfaction and due process, setting aside the cancellation order for lack of reasons and hearing.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant GST registration retrospective cancellation Section 29(2) CGST Act Show Cause Notice

Tarapore & Co v. Commissioner of Trade & Taxes & Anr

10 Apr 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:3124-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner is entitled to statutory interest at 1.5% per month on delayed refund under the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 for the three years preceding the petition filing, despite the Act's repeal.

tax petition_allowed Significant refund claim delayed refund interest Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 Section 30(4)

M/S. VISHAL CHEM (INDIA) v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND TAXES

10 Apr 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:3122-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte tax demand order under Section 73 of the CGST Act for failure to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remitted the matter for re-adjudication after affording a proper hearing.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 73 CGST Act Show Cause Notice Input Tax Credit

KAYCEE POLYMERS PVT. LTD. v. THE UNION OF INDIA REVENUE SECRETARY & ORS.

10 Apr 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:2970-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a cryptic order confirming tax demand under Section 73 CGST Act for failure to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication with opportunity of hearing.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 73 CGST Act Input Tax Credit Show Cause Notice