Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Co Ltd v. Poonam Sharma

24 Oct 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:8885
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld driver’s negligence, accepted deceased’s income and age evidence, added future prospects, and enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim appeal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim negligence future prospects loss of dependency

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax- 2, Delhi v. M/S. Burberry India Pvt. Ltd.

24 Oct 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:10240-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal’s decision that the Resale Price Method is the most appropriate method for benchmarking import of finished goods by a routine distributor without value addition, dismissing the Revenue’s appeal.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Resale Price Method Transfer Pricing Arms Length Price International Transaction

Gopal Mohan Atri v. Union of India & Ors.

24 Oct 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8250-DB

The Delhi High Court partially allowed the writ petition challenging adverse Confidential Reports of an Army officer, holding that inconsistent partial expunctions were impermissible and directing reconsideration of promotion and course nomination.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Confidential Reports Army Ordnance Corps Judicial Review Article 226

Vijay Singh v. Union of India and Ors.

24 Oct 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8316-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the ITBP transfer order, holding that judicial interference is unwarranted when the competent authority has duly considered and rejected the medical grounds representation.

administrative petition_dismissed transfer posting medical category ITBP judicial interference

Jagpal Singh Shekhawat v. Union of India

24 Oct 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8276-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's claim for increments in light of relevant Supreme Court decisions and pass a reasoned order within eight weeks.

administrative petition_allowed increment service benefits Article 226 Supreme Court decision

Rajeshwar Tyagi v. Union of India & Anr.

24 Oct 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8274-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner’s claim for increments in light of relevant Supreme Court decisions within eight weeks and pass a reasoned order, allowing the petition.

administrative petition_allowed Article 226 increments Supreme Court decision time-bound consideration

M /S GE CAPITAL EUROPEAN TREASURY SERVICES LIMITED v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 1 3 1, NEW DELHI & ORS.

23 Oct 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:8216-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act extinguishes claims for statutory interest under Section 244A of the Income Tax Act but directed payment of interest for delay in refund release.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 Section 244A Income Tax Act statutory interest tax refund delay

Union of India v. EX HFL Nathu Ram

23 Oct 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8279-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting enhanced disability pension to a discharged serviceman, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service unless disproved.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension military service Entitlement Rules for Casualty Pensionary Awards, 1982 Armed Forces Tribunal

Girish Chandra Joshi v. Union of India

23 Oct 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8226-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's claim for increment in light of a Supreme Court judgment and pass a reasoned order within eight weeks.

administrative petition_allowed Article 226 increment service claim Supreme Court decision

Delhi Development Authority v. Jagdeep Bali

23 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:8288

The Delhi High Court upheld consumer forum orders directing DDA to allot a MIG flat to the respondent due to improper communication of allotment and cancellation.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Development Authority MIG flat allotment Consumer Protection Act, 1986 service of communication

R. Kay Fabtex Pvt. Ltd. v. Vinod Agencies

23 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:8289

The High Court directed the Trial Court to decide the territorial jurisdiction issue at final arguments, refusing to interfere with the interlocutory dismissal of the jurisdictional objection under Order VII Rule 10 CPC.

civil other territorial jurisdiction Order VII Rule 10 CPC return of plaint interlocutory order

Delhi Development Authority v. Bachhi Devi Through LRs

23 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:8290

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a delayed revision petition by the NCDRC, holding that no sufficient cause was shown to condone the delay under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

civil petition_dismissed Significant condonation of delay limitation Consumer Protection Act, 2019 revision petition

Harish Kumar Gupta & Anr. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

23 Oct 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:8228

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354, 509, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, emphasizing the scope of inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of court process in minor offence cases.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR amicable settlement offences against women

Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board v. Zile Singh Thr Lrs

23 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:8291
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court directed DUSIB to hand over possession of a shop to the decree-holder's widow by a specified date and allowed the executing court to issue procedural directions within the decree's scope.

civil petition_dismissed possession execution petition license allotment procedural formalities

Kela Devi v. Anil Kumar Jain & Ors.

23 Oct 2024 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:8292

The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for possession due to failure to properly identify the property and reliance on fabricated documents, directing perjury proceedings against the plaintiff and imposing costs.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 3 CPC description of immovable property relinquishment deed perjury

Mukeem Khan v. MIM Trading and Construction Company

23 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:8310

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's order closing the defendant's right to lead evidence for repeated non-appearance, affirming the trial court's discretion and the need for expeditious disposal in commercial suits.

civil petition_dismissed Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC Article 227 Constitution of India closing right to lead evidence commercial suit

Rajesh Jain v. Jitender Jain & Ors.

23 Oct 2024 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:8263
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff’s application seeking judgment on admissions of oral partition, holding that the plaintiff is bound by his original pleadings that the Veer Nagar property is undivided and cannot resile from that position to the prejudice of other parties.

civil petition_dismissed Significant partition suit oral partition Order XII Rule 6 CPC relinquishment deed

Runa Devi v. The State NCT of Delhi

23 Oct 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma

The Delhi High Court dismissed habeas corpus petitions after tracing all missing persons, directing interim custody of minor children with their father and permitting police action against parties who misled the investigation.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant habeas corpus missing persons unlawful detention minor children custody

Court on Its Own Motion v. Zenith Mining Pvt Ltd & Anr

23 Oct 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:8286-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging its order directing filing of a complaint for alleged fabrication of documents under Section 193 IPC, holding that no separate show cause notice was required and the order is not amenable to review.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 193 IPC Section 195(1)(b) Cr.P.C. fabrication of documents false evidence

Subhash Garg v. S K Srivastava

23 Oct 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:8654

The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition against the Rehabilitation Council of India, holding that no wilful disobedience occurred as the Council acted within its jurisdictional limits and appropriately corresponded with State authorities.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Rehabilitation Council of India Act, 1992 Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995 wilful disobedience