Delhi High Court

48,936 judgments

Year:

Union of India v. M/S ANS Construction Ltd

28 Jun 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:4862
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court partly set aside an arbitral award by quashing compensation for idling of resources due to lack of evidence, while upholding other claims including price escalation and extra cement consumption, affirming limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

civil petition_partly_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge patent illegality price escalation

Indira Television Ltd v. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India

28 Jun 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:4815

The Delhi High Court held that disconnection of a television channel without mandatory three weeks' prior written notice under TRAI regulations is illegal and directed restoration of the channel's transmission pending TDSAT proceedings.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant TRAI Interconnection Regulations 2017 disconnection notice television channel disconnection Multi System Operator

Rachana Television Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.

28 Jun 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:4814

The Delhi High Court held that disconnection of a broadcaster's channel without mandatory prior notice under TRAI regulations and contractual terms is illegal and directed immediate restoration of the channel.

administrative petition_allowed Significant TRAI Interconnection Regulations 2017 Channel Placement Agreement Disconnection of television channels Prior notice requirement

Deepak Duggal v. State

28 Jun 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:4812

The Delhi High Court granted Probate of a 1985 Will excluding two daughters, holding it validly executed in sound mind without fraud or undue influence, and dismissed objections challenging its genuineness and validity.

civil petition_allowed Significant Probate Will Indian Succession Act, 1925 Sound disposing mind

Hershey India Private Limited v. Rajendra Prasad

27 Jun 2024 · Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:4781

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order allowing the plaintiff to summon the defendant's employee as a witness and dismissed the petition challenging the summons, affirming the procedural and substantive rights to summon relevant evidence under Order XVI CPC.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order XVI CPC summons of witnesses natural justice self-incrimination

Rajni Gupta v. Sanjay Gupta & Anr.

27 Jun 2024 · Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:4779

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a summary judgment application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, holding that no clear admission existed to deprive respondents of their right to trial on disputed ownership and possession issues.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC summary judgment admission landlord-tenant relationship

Sapan Ahlawat & Anr. v. Mohan Clothing Company Pvt. Ltd.

27 Jun 2024 · Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:4778

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's refusal to allow belated production of documents in a commercial suit, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural timelines and pleadings under the Commercial Courts Act and CPC.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order VIII Rule 1A(3) CPC Commercial Courts Act 2015 production of documents pleadings and evidence

Vijay Kumar v. Kaushalya Devi & Ors.

27 Jun 2024 · Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:4784

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to restore a partition suit dismissed in default due to the appellant's medical incapacity and reliance on counsel, imposing costs to ensure procedural discipline.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order IX Rule 9 CPC dismissal in default restoration of suit condonation of delay

Shyamwati Devi & Anr. v. Ashwani Sain & Ors.

27 Jun 2024 · Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:4783

The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a summary judgment application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, holding that only categorical admissions permit such judgment and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.

civil other Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC summary judgment admission pagdi amount

Gursahib Singh Sethi v. Garima Batra

27 Jun 2024 · Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:4780

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a delayed written statement in a divorce proceeding due to counsel’s negligence and medical issues, setting aside the Family Court’s closure order.

family appeal_allowed Significant written statement Order VIII Rule 1 CPC extension of time negligence of counsel

Bharat Agarwal & Ors. v. NMDC Limited

27 Jun 2024 · Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:4782

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of petitioners' application to file additional documents in a commercial suit, holding that failure to disclose documents held by a previous advocate does not constitute reasonable cause under Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC reasonable cause disclosure of documents Commercial Courts Act 2015

SH DIPANKAR DUTTA AND ANR v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI

26 Jun 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:4789

The court directed the petitioner to comply with the Invalid Notice and restrained demolition during the pendency of the regularization application, disposing of the petition challenging the demolition order.

administrative petition_dismissed demolition order unauthorized construction regularization application Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957

Praveen v. State

26 Jun 2024 · Mini Pushkarna; Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:4786-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a habeas corpus petition after the wife and minor child were produced and the wife stated she left voluntarily, finding no unlawful detention.

criminal petition_dismissed habeas corpus unlawful detention custody minor child

Tanuj Dhawan v. Sonica Singhi

26 Jun 2024 · Mini Pushkarna; Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:4785-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the father's appeal seeking extended summer vacation custody, upholding the Family Court's visitation order prioritizing the child's welfare and gradual bonding.

family appeal_dismissed child custody visitation rights minor child welfare emotional stability

Dr. Shivinder Mohan Singh v. Serious Fraud Investigation Office & Anr.

26 Jun 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:4775

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking suspension of Look Out Circular and permission to travel abroad during an ongoing SFIO investigation into serious financial fraud, holding that national economic interest and flight risk outweigh personal reasons.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Look Out Circular Serious Fraud Investigation Office Companies Act, 2013 financial fraud

Amit Katyal v. Directorate of Enforcement Government of India

26 Jun 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:4776
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court granted interim bail on medical grounds to an accused under PMLA due to his critical post-Bariatric Surgery condition and jail's inability to provide requisite specialized diet and care.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant interim bail medical grounds Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Section 45(1) PMLA

Directorate of Enforcement v. Arvind Kejriwal

25 Jun 2024 · Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:4767

The Delhi High Court stayed the bail granted to Arvind Kejriwal in a PMLA money laundering case, emphasizing the need for proper application of section 45 PMLA conditions and opportunity to the prosecution before granting bail.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Section 45 PMLA Bail Personal liberty

Associated Broadcasting Company Private Limited v. Union of India & Anr.

24 Jun 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:4774

The Delhi High Court directed uninterrupted transmission of the petitioner's channel pending TDSAT adjudication, holding that disconnection without mandatory notice violates TRAI regulations and contractual terms.

administrative petition_allowed TRAI Interconnection Regulations 2017 Channel Placement Agreement Disconnection notice Telecom Disputes Settlement & Appellate Tribunal

Barinder Kaur v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr

24 Jun 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:4773-DB

The Delhi High Court reduced the security amount from ₹1 Crore to ₹5 Lacs for an accused's travel abroad, holding that security conditions must be proportionate to the charges and consistent with those imposed on co-accused.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Fixed Deposit Receipt security for travel abroad Look Out Circular CBI case

Maj Anshul Verma & Ors. v. Union of India Ors.

24 Jun 2024 · Mini Pushkarna; Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:4772-DB

The Delhi High Court directed petitioners to seek clarification from the Armed Forces Tribunal regarding vacancy allocation for M.Tech admissions under the Army quota, declining to modify the interim order restricting vacancies.

administrative other Armed Forces Tribunal M.Tech admission Army quota Other Arms and Services