Delhi High Court
48,936 judgments
ATS Infrastructure Limited & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking quashing of an FIR alleging cheating and criminal breach of trust in a real estate buy-back scheme, holding that investigation must proceed as the FIR discloses cognizable offences.
M/S ATS Infrastructure Limited & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of an FIR alleging cheating and criminal breach of trust in a real estate buy-back scheme, holding that investigation must proceed as prima facie offences were disclosed.
Rakesh Yadav & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that an FIR alleging rape under Section 376 IPC cannot be quashed merely on the basis of a monetary settlement or compromise, emphasizing the need for trial to uphold justice and the integrity of the criminal justice system.
Yashoda Organic Foods Pvt Ltd v. Bharat Bhushan Gera
The High Court allowed the petitioner’s appeal under Article 227, permitting the delayed list of witnesses to be taken on record subject to costs, emphasizing the right to fair trial and procedural flexibility.
Dobariya Mohit Ramnikal v. Department of Higher Education
Delhi High Court held that the petitioner’s M. Arch. degree from University of Maryland, accredited by NAAB, is entitled to recognition under Section 15(1) of the Architects Act, directing the Central Government to notify accordingly for registration as an architect in India.
SLS COLLEGE OF PHARMACY v. PHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court held that approval granted under Section 12 of the Pharmacy Act is for the entire course and struck down the Pharmacy Council of India's requirement for yearly renewal of approval and annual charging of regulatory fees.
Nikunj Kapadiya & Ors. v. Indira Gandhi National Open University & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging IGNOU's withdrawal of re-admission rights and credit transfer restrictions, holding the petitioners' claims barred by delay and upholding the academic policy changes as rational and lawful.
Pinky Kaur v. Mohit Shukla
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of the Trial Court's dismissal of an application to set aside an ex-parte order but permitted the defendants to file a recall application before the Trial Court within a stipulated time.
Navigators Visa Global Logistics Ltd v. Thermoking Thr Its Proprietor Pradeep Khanna
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and held that the defendant failed to prove cash payments, entitling the plaintiff to recover ₹3,39,101 with interest as per invoices and legal notice.
Nitin Grover v. Kartika Grover & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the binding nature of an undertaking to pay interim maintenance, directing the husband to continue monthly payments despite the wife's failure to secure alternate rented accommodation.
Ravinder Chadha v. Virender Chadha & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the binding and enforceable nature of a family mediation settlement under Section 73 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, dismissing the appellant's challenge and directing enforcement of the settlement terms.
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd v. Maya Devi
The Delhi High Court upheld a motor accident compensation award with modifications, affirming joint liability of negligent drivers and insurer under the 'Pay and Recover' principle and clarifying standards for future prospects and interest.
Phool Singh v. Rajasthan State Road Corporation
The Delhi High Court allowed the motor accident claim appeal, holding that amputation of the thumb entails 30% loss of earning capacity and awarding enhanced compensation accordingly.
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd v. Santosh Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court reduced the compensation awarded in a motor accident claim by applying appropriate deductions for dependency and future prospects, while upholding insurer liability and interest.
Orris Infrastructure Pvt Ltd v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a subsequent FIR based on the same allegations as an earlier FIR is impermissible and directed it to be clubbed with the ongoing investigation, restraining coercive action against the petitioner.
MS Metropolitan Stock Exchange of India v. MS Abhipra Capital Limited & Ors.
Delhi courts have territorial jurisdiction over a suit for refund of stock exchange membership fees where the petitioner has a regional office and part of the cause of action arose in Delhi.
Sunita Devi & Ors. v. Satish Kumar Chaudhary & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the motor accident claim appeal due to failure of the claimants to prove the involvement of the offending vehicle and unreliability of the key eyewitness testimony.
Rahul Kaul v. Manoj Kumar & Ors
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by including full salary components and increasing non-pecuniary damages, while reducing interest rate to 7.5% per annum.
Yashpal v. Rakesh Kumar & Anr
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying correct multiplier, factoring future prospects, and upholding disability assessment, directing payment with interest.
Yasin Malik v. Lok Pal Singh & Ors
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by considering future income prospects and reasonable non-pecuniary damages while upholding the Tribunal's disability assessment.