Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Usha and Ors. v. Shish Pal Singh
The Delhi High Court stayed the eviction order against the tenant pending further hearing, directing payment of user charges and examining the bona fide need and alternate accommodation issues.
Anupama Malhotra & Ors. v. Dr. Kamlesh Malhotra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court decreed a suit for partition of an intestate estate based on a lawful family settlement, appointing the mother as guardian for minor heirs and directing transmission of assets accordingly.
Shahensha Enterprises & Anr. v. Shree Sai Ram Traders
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's amendment allowing inclusion of a previously excluded claim subject to limitation objections, but disallowed a material amendment altering territorial jurisdiction.
Harcharan Dass Gupta v. WAPCOS Limited and Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, directing preliminary objections including limitation to be decided at the outset and arbitration to proceed under DIAC rules.
Balaji Unique Builders Pvt Ltd v. Mukesh Meena & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to consider the ex-parte injunction application on merits and record reasons if refusing relief, without expressing any opinion on the merits.
Experion Hospitality Pvt Ltd v. Income Tax Officer & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed reassessment notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2008-09 and 2011-12, holding that acceptance of foreign investment transactions in subsequent years precludes reopening earlier assessments on the same grounds.
Ather Ali @ Munni Raja & Anr. v. Mohd. Shafi (Deceased) through AR Mohd. Akbar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as time barred, holding that the appellants failed to provide sufficient cause to condone a delay of over five years in filing an appeal against an ex-parte money decree under Order XXXVII CPC.
Visuvanathan Rudrakumaran v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Tribunal’s rejection of a foreign sympathizer’s application for impleadment in LTTE ban proceedings, affirming limited locus and deferential judicial review in national security cases under UAPA.
DY.CIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 28 v. M/S ASM TRAXIM PVT. LTD. & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that the test of full and true disclosure before the Income Tax Settlement Commission is indivisible for income computation and grant of immunity, dismissing a partial challenge to immunity granted under Section 245H.
T.K.S. Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer Ward 25(3)
The Delhi High Court held that reassessment notices under Section 148 must be issued exclusively through the faceless procedure under Section 151A, invalidating notices issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer post-faceless scheme implementation.
Zync Global Pvt Ltd v. Punjab National Bank
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging refusal of interim relief against a bank's fraud classification of an account based on Income Tax investigation findings, upholding the bank's action pending final adjudication.
Anju Bala Arora v. Tapan Mudgal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted the petitioner one final opportunity to lead evidence subject to payment of costs, modifying the Trial Court’s order in light of financial constraints and consent of the respondent.
Hari Om Sharma v. Sauman Kumar Chatterjee & Anr.
Delhi High Court upheld arbitration awards resolving partnership disputes, holding that unregistered firms' disputes are arbitrable despite Section 69 bar on civil suits, and affirmed limitation and interest rulings.
Manmohan Singh Kohli v. Amarjit Singh Kohli & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a Gift Deed and Will, dismissed the plaintiff's claim for partition of alleged joint family properties, holding the properties to be self-acquired and owned exclusively by defendant No.1.
Korra Worldwide Advertising Pvt Ltd v. HT Digital Streams Limited
The Delhi High Court held that procedural defects in a written statement, including absence of signatures on each page and improper verification, are curable and allowed the rectified written statement to be taken on record with costs.
Kanhiya Lal Prakesh Kumar v. AJM Housing Pvt. Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that the actual use of immovable property exclusively in trade or commerce determines the commercial nature of a dispute under the Commercial Courts Act, dismissing the petition challenging jurisdiction.
Tika Ram v. Chet Ram & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's revision challenging the trial court's refusal to grant summary judgment on disputed facts concerning the validity and cancellation of a General Power of Attorney and related property transfers.
Munendra Kumar v. Government of NCT Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that suspension of a government servant can be validly extended beyond three months without issuance of charge sheet if justified reasons are recorded, dismissing the petition challenging the suspension order.
M/S CENTURY 21 MALLS PVT LTD. v. BEYOND MALLS LLP
The Delhi High Court upheld the jurisdiction of the seat of arbitration and refused interim reliefs under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, granting liberty to file a fresh application before the Arbitrator.
Amaterasu Foods Pvt Ltd v. Brajesh Kumar Prop of M/S Kumar Interiors
The High Court restored the defendant's struck-off defence after suit amendment, directing filing of amended written statement with costs, allowing the petition to proceed.