Delhi High Court

48,408 judgments

Year:

Bimla Sachdev v. Subur & Anr

18 Jul 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:5270

The Delhi High Court held the DDA guilty of wilful contempt for disobeying its directions to allot an unencumbered plot and execute conveyance deed, applying the doctrine of estoppel to uphold the petitioner's rights.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Contempt of Court Doctrine of Estoppel Delhi Development Authority Plot Allotment

Vijay Vardhan Daga v. M/S Lord Builders Pvt Ltd

18 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:5325

The Delhi High Court condoned a five-day delay in filing an appeal by a senior citizen residing outside the jurisdiction and restored the appeal to be decided on merits.

civil appeal_allowed condonation of delay Article 227 Constitution of India appeal restoration delay in filing appeal

Laxmi Rajvansh and Anr v. Shama

18 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:5327

The court dismissed the petitioners' application for impleadment after the plaintiff's death, holding that they must first establish their title through a pending probate petition and separate suit before seeking substitution.

civil petition_dismissed Order XXII Rule 3 CPC Section 151 CPC impleadment substitution of parties

Jubeda Begum v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

18 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:5329

The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of a 173-day delay in filing an appeal against a demolition order, emphasizing liberal construction of 'sufficient cause' under the Limitation Act to advance substantial justice.

civil appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay limitation period sufficient cause Delhi Municipal Corporation Act

Sahil Viklang Sahaytartha Samiti v. Delhi Development Authority

18 Jul 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:5316

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners to hold a religious function on a designated multipurpose ground within a District Park, quashing the DDA’s refusal, while emphasizing compliance with environmental safeguards and statutory zoning under MPD-2021.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Master Plan Delhi-2021 District Park Multipurpose Ground Delhi Development Authority

Renu Sharma & Anr. v. Mool Chand Sharma

18 Jul 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:5266-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld divorce on cruelty grounds but reversed the Family Court's denial of maintenance to the wife, directing enhanced interim maintenance payments considering the parties' financial positions.

family appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 maintenance adultery cruelty

Commissioner of Police v. Shri Karam Pal; Commissioner of Police v. Ram Kishan Mehta

18 Jul 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order setting aside dismissal of police officials under Article 311(2)(b) for lack of cogent reasons to dispense with departmental enquiry, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural safeguards.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Article 311(2)(b) Constitution of India Departmental Enquiry Dismissal of government servant Reasonably practicable

Dish TV India Ltd v. Gulf DTH FZ LLC & Ors.

18 Jul 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:5268-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the mandatory 120-day period for filing written statement under the Commercial Courts Act applies only after a suit is converted into a commercial suit, allowing the appellant's delayed written statement to be taken on record and the appeal against closure of filing rights to be maintained.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Order VIII Rule 1 CPC written statement commercial suit

Ms. Shweta Singh v. Shakeel Ahmad

18 Jul 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:5273-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a Research Assistant performing teaching duties falls within the statutory definition of 'Teacher' and is entitled to retire at 65 years, dismissing the University's appeal against reinstatement with back wages.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant superannuation age teacher definition Research Assistant Jamia Millia Islamia Act

Lakshay Jaiswal v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

18 Jul 2024 · Vikas Mahajan
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court quashed non-bailable warrants and Section 82 CrPC proceedings issued prematurely against the petitioner, upheld his right to anticipatory bail, and emphasized strict adherence to procedural safeguards before issuing warrants.

criminal petition_allowed Significant non-bailable warrant Section 82 CrPC anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC

Vanita Bathla v. Shashi Bajaj & Anr.

18 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:5322

The Delhi High Court allowed a petition under Article 227 permitting the petitioner to place previously declined documents on record to ensure fair trial and directed the Trial Court to proceed further.

civil appeal_allowed Article 227 Constitution of India Order XI Rule 1(10) CPC Section 151 CPC admission of documents

G. Veerabahu v. Union of India & Ors.

18 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:5323

The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to consider the pending Section 340 Cr.P.C. application without commenting on its merits, emphasizing timely judicial action.

criminal other Section 340 Cr.P.C. discretionary power trial court application delay

Sunita Bansal v. Rajan Bansal

18 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:5324

The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to expeditiously dispose of pending execution petitions arising from an interim maintenance order, without expressing any opinion on their merits.

civil other Article 227 Constitution of India execution petitions interim maintenance expeditious disposal

Girish Rehani v. Keltech Infrastructure Limited

16 Jul 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:5157

The Delhi High Court granted a six-month extension of the arbitrator's mandate under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with no objection from the respondent.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29A(4) extension of arbitrator mandate arbitration proceedings

Central Board of Secondary Education v. Mount Columbus School

16 Jul 2024 · Acting Chief Justice Manmohan; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:5789-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Delhi High Court held that natural justice does not always require a personal hearing before withdrawing school affiliation, allowing the appeal with directions for re-inspection and compliance.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant natural justice audi alteram partem personal hearing provisional affiliation

M/S STEELMART INDIA v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF GOODS AND SERVICES TAX, SOUTH DELHI

16 Jul 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:5233-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a GST cancellation show cause notice must disclose material allegations to enable response, and allowed the petitioner to respond to allegations of fake Input Tax Credit and non-existence before final decision.

tax other Significant GST registration cancellation show cause notice Section 29(2)(e) CGST Act fake Input Tax Credit

Shaheed Udham Singh Smarak Shiksha Samiti v. Usha Tyagi; Shaheed Udham Singh Smarak Shiksha Samiti v. Santosh Verma; Shaheed Udham Singh Smarak Shiksha Samiti v. Suman Lata

16 Jul 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta

The Delhi High Court held that employees of unaided unrecognized schools have the right to appeal before the Delhi School Tribunal under the DSE Act, and termination without following due process is invalid.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi School Education Act, 1973 Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 unrecognized unaided schools Delhi School Tribunal

Mukesh Kumar v. Neelam

16 Jul 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:5456

The Delhi High Court upheld a Family Court order directing an LIC agent husband to pay Rs. 20,000 monthly maintenance to his wife and children under Section 125 CrPC, affirming the court's power to estimate income for interim relief.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Section 125 CrPC interim maintenance LIC agent income maintenance of wife and children

Shivi Bansal v. Gaurav Bansal

16 Jul 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:5541-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a divorce petition cannot be partially rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC if any ground such as cruelty is viable, and that an alleged adulterer is neither a necessary nor proper party to the proceedings.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC Hindu Marriage Act 1955 desertion adultery

Delhi Jal Board v. M/S Envirotech Overseas India Ltd.

16 Jul 2024 · Jasmeet Singh

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to set aside the arbitral award, upholding the award on security deposit release and outstanding payments, and allowed enforcement of the award against Delhi Jal Board.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitral Award Section 34 Arbitration Act Patent Illegality Contract Foreclosure