Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
NEXXBASE MARKETING PVT. LTD. v. PARMINDER SINGH
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to the plaintiff against the defendant for trademark infringement and passing off of the registered "NOISE" marks, proceeding ex-parte due to the defendant's non-appearance.
P. B. David v. The Estate Officer & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of an appeal on limitation grounds, condoned the delay citing Covid-19 and personal reasons, and directed a fresh hearing on merits under the Public Premises Act.
Vasishta Mantena NH04 JV & Ors. v. Blacklead Infratech Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed a Section 34 petition challenging an arbitral award as barred by limitation, holding that filing without the award copy is invalid and delay beyond the prescribed period cannot be condoned.
MS RAPID CONSTRUCTIONS v. SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
The Delhi High Court held that an arbitration clause expressly deleted by the parties and affirmed by the State instrumentality is not enforceable, dismissing the petition for appointment of an arbitrator.
Miss T v. State (GNCTD) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside bail granted by a Vacation Judge to an accused in a rape case due to pending bail application before the High Court and condemned forum shopping through successive bail applications.
Asha Chhatwal v. Surendra Kohli
The Delhi High Court held that a partner in a firm is vicariously liable under Section 138 of the NI Act and refused to quash summons issued to a petitioner partner lacking specific allegations against her.
Petitioner v. State of GNCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the discharge of the accused's father and mother from criminal intimidation and insult to modesty charges, holding that mere words without intent do not satisfy Sections 506 and 509 IPC at the charge framing stage.
Sh. Lallan Sah v. Sh. Ravi Kumar Pasi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition upholding the conviction under Section 138 NI Act, affirming that the presumption of liability on cheque dishonour stands unless credibly rebutted.
Neha Chaudhary v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court refused to quash an FIR alleging matrimonial cruelty and harassment against the petitioner's sister-in-law, holding that specific allegations disclosed cognizable offences warranting investigation and trial.
State v. Naveen Kumar Dhoulpuria
The High Court held that at the discharge stage, sufficient prima facie material existed to frame charges against the accused for impersonation and cheating in an examination, setting aside the discharge order.
Sanaulla Zulfiqar Ahmed Khan v. State of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR alleging cheating, holding that multiple FIRs by different complainants on similar facts are permissible and do not constitute abuse of process.
M/S Anant Raj Projects Ltd. v. Union of India & Another
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeals challenging compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, upholding the reference court's valuation based on bona fide transactions and rejecting speculative higher valuations.
Pawan Kumar Ahluwalia & Ors. v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash a second FIR alleging criminal breach of trust and misappropriation, holding that it disclosed distinct offences beyond the GST Act and warranted investigation.
Shelly Narang v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
The High Court upheld summons against a company director under Section 138 NI Act, holding that mere denial without unimpeachable evidence is insufficient to quash proceedings under Section 482 CrPC.
Seema Devi v. Suresh Kumar
The High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a Section 138 NI Act case, holding that the accused successfully rebutted the presumption under Section 139 by raising a probable defense on the preponderance of probabilities.
XXX v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The High Court dismissed the complainant's direct appeal against acquittal by the Magistrate on maintainability grounds, directing the appeal to be filed before the Sessions Court.
M/S SUPER CIRCLE AUTO LTD. v. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, DELHI AND ORS
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing release of MEIS rewards to the exporter despite inadvertent procedural errors in shipping bills, relying on Supreme Court precedent affirming entitlement where intention to claim is clear.
M/S TDI Infrastructure Limited v. Supreet Kaur & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for lack of territorial jurisdiction, directing the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional High Court as per Supreme Court precedent.
Sh Surender Singh v. Smt Shashi Bala Shukla & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to restore a suit dismissed-in-default due to non-appearance caused by a court strike and ill-health, emphasizing timely restoration applications under Order IX Rule 9 CPC.
Santosh & Ors. v. Sunil Yadav & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's revision petition as infructuous after possession was restored to the landlord through execution, affirming the limited scope of revisional jurisdiction under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.