Delhi High Court
48,408 judgments
Pulin Comtrade Limited v. The Handicrafts and Handlooms Exports Corporation of India Ltd
The Delhi High Court set aside the arbitral award's denial of interest for 2015-2017, holding that the arbitrator erred in ignoring contractual terms mandating interest on term deposits.
The National Insurance Co Ltd v. Dilip Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court modified a motor accident compensation award by reducing the disability percentage to account for pre-existing disability, thereby recalculating just and reasonable compensation payable.
Dilip Kumar v. National Insurance Co. Ltd. and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's challenge to the compensation awarded for injuries in a motor accident, holding that the quantum had already been modified in a prior appeal.
Sri Ram Packers v. Ganga Ram & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the application for condonation of a 427-day delay in filing an appeal, holding that ignorance of the order and reliance on counsel's assurances do not constitute sufficient cause under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
Smt. Daya Rani v. Rajeev Gulati
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking leave to appeal against acquittal in a Section 138 NI Act case, holding that part payment without endorsement on the cheque negates the offence of cheque dishonour.
Paras Arora v. M/S Aggarwal Associates
The Delhi High Court held that RERA does not have jurisdiction over projects completed before its commencement, dismissing the appellant's complaint and appeal for lack of maintainability.
Sharad Bhansali & Anr. v. Mukesh Aggarwal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld that an Agreement to Sell followed by possession under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act attracts stamp duty under Article 23A of the Indian Stamp Act, dismissing the appeal against the arbitrator's order impounding the insufficiently stamped ATS.
Prateek Soni v. National Faceless Assessment Centre
The Delhi High Court held that reassessment notices issued to deceased assessees without addressing legal representatives are invalid, quashing such notices and allowing fresh proceedings against legal heirs in accordance with law.
Varun Kumar and Ors. v. Latika Vats
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking quashing of domestic violence proceedings, holding that a settlement does not bar fresh complaints and disputed facts preclude summary quashing.
Sh Lalit Kishore & Ors. v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR against the petitioners for cheating and criminal conspiracy in a bank loan dispute after the parties settled their dues and the fraud declaration was set aside.
Usha Jain v. M/S Vigneshwara Developwell P. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioners' application for release of funds deposited with the Court in a company winding up proceeding, holding that the amount forms part of the liquidation estate and must be claimed before the Official Liquidator.
JUSTICE FOR ALL v. Lieutenant Governor, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the University Chancellor to expeditiously decide the petitioner’s representation concerning alleged violations of seat reservation provisions under the DPCI Act, without adjudicating on the merits.
The Commissioner of Income Tax - International Taxation -3 v. Telstra Singapore Pte Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's ruling that payments received by Telstra Singapore from Indian customers for bandwidth services provided outside India do not constitute taxable royalty income under Section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act and Article 12 of the India-Singapore DTAA.
M/S OM METALS RATNAKAR PVT LTD v. NBCC (INDIA) LTD
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s appeal by directing payment of 50% of disputed maintenance charges as a compromise, without prejudice to further legal remedies.
Inderpreet Singh Gulati v. Vikas Arora
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the refusal to produce documents at the final stage of a civil suit, holding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate relevancy and necessity of the documents sought.
Nitin Tokas v. Joginder Singh Tokas
The High Court held that at the preliminary stage, the plaint’s valuation of suit properties must be accepted and the petitioner cannot be directed to re-value and pay additional court fee before trial.
Anil William Thomas Proprietor of M/s 3354 / Anil William Thomas Security Agency v. Employees State Insurance Corporation
The Delhi High Court waived the deposit requirement under Section 75(2B) of the ESI Act in a case involving a disputed and allegedly fraudulent ESIC Code, allowing the petitioner to contest the demand without prepayment.
Autonix Logistics and Agro Solutions Private Limited v. Vivek Contracts Pvt. Ltd.
The High Court upheld the Trial Court's refusal to admit a belated test report in a commercial recovery suit due to lack of reasonable cause for delay, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural timelines under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
Evaan Holdings Private Limited v. Reserve Bank of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court issued notice and directed RBI to update on regulatory actions against an NBFC amid allegations of mismanagement, emphasizing limited judicial interference pending specialized tribunal proceedings.
Tanya Sharma v. State NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted interim visitation rights to the mother in a child custody dispute, emphasizing the child's welfare and maintaining parental access pending final orders.